journal article·2026-06-13Open access

A Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Framework Integrating Time–Frequency Features and Combined Weighting for Matching Impact Signals with Multi-Layer Penetration Response Signals

Huifa Shi, Kunming Jia, Feiyin Li, Mingxi Chen, Rongxiang Xia, Shaojie Ma

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 12

Abstract

In impact testing, evaluating multiple-impact signals is critical for verifying whether a test setup can reproduce penetration response signals and ensure reliable results. To overcome the limitations of traditional methods, including incomplete indicator coverage, subjective weighting, and poor consistency, this study proposes a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) framework based on time–frequency features and combined weighting. Using multi-layer penetration response signals as the matching target, a multidimensional indicator system covering time-domain features, frequency-domain features, and signal quality and stability is established. A combined weighting method integrating AHP, EWM, and CRITIC is then developed, and subjective and objective weights are fused using the geometric mean method. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model is used to quantify the matching degrees of multiple sets of multiple-impact signals, and robustness is verified through weight consistency tests and sensitivity analysis. The results show that the evaluated signal sets are rated “Excellent”. Under reasonable weight combinations, the probability of obtaining an “Excellent” result reaches 99.94%, and the maximum variation caused by a ±10% perturbation in a single indicator weight is only 0.0087. The proposed framework provides a practical tool for evaluating multi-layer penetration response simulations and can be extended to other complex dynamic signal-matching problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

School of Locomotive and Rolling Stock, Nanjing Vocational Institute of Railway Technology, Nanjing 210031, China

Funding

Open Fund Project of Jiangsu Provincial Engineering Center for High-speed Railway Digital Twin Full-dimensional Intelligent Management

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Xu, B.C., Liu, J.Z., Jin, Y.C., Yang, K.Y., Zhao, S.Y., and Peng, Y. (2025). Vibration–collision coupling modeling in grape clusters for non-damage harvesting operations. Agriculture, 15.10.3390/agriculture15020154 ↗
2. Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of axial-torsional coupled percussive drilling10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111094 ↗
3. A multi-source information fusion layer counting method for penetration fuze based on TCN-LSTM10.1016/j.dt.2023.09.008 ↗
4. Zu, J., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Yu, D., and Dai, K.R. (2026). Adaptive end-side intelligent feature recognition system for acceleration measurement signals with strong adhesion interference under continuous multi-impact. Def. Technol.10.1016/j.dt.2025.12.018 ↗
5. Cascino, A., Nencioni, L., Lanzillo, L., Mazzeo, F., Strano, S., Terzo, M., Delle Monache, S., and Meli, E. (2026). Development and experimental validation of a physics-based digital twin for railway freight wagon monitoring. Sensors, 26.10.3390/s26020643 ↗
6. Cascino, A., Delle Monache, S., Lanzillo, L., Mazzeo, F., Nencioni, L., Nicolella, A., Strano, S., and Terzo, M. (2025). Development and experimental testing of a 3D vision system for railway freight wagon monitoring. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152111547 ↗
7. Cascino, A., Meli, E., Rindi, A., Pucci, E., and Matoni, E. (2025). Experimental validation and dynamic analysis of additive manufacturing burner for gas turbine applications. Machines, 13.10.3390/machines13121111 ↗
8. González-Barrio, H., Calleja-Ochoa, A., Lamikiz, A., and López de Lacalle, L.N. (2020). Manufacturing processes of integral blade rotors for turbomachinery, processes and new approaches. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10093063 ↗
9. Multiple dynamic impact signal identification method based on lightweight neural network with acceleration sensor10.1109/JSEN.2023.3291754 ↗
10. Simulation and experimental research of continuous high impact test equipment10.1088/1757-899X/428/1/012015 ↗
11. Low-velocity, high-energy impact methodology for simulating overload responses during multilayer projectile penetration10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109042 ↗
12. Analysis and experimental study of acceleration model for short interval and multiple impact equipment10.1155/2019/5139137 ↗
13. Yaralioglu, I., and Kara, C. (2025). Sustainable urban design approach for public spaces using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Land, 14.10.3390/land14010019 ↗
14. Decision analysis method integrating EWM and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation10.1016/j.procs.2024.10.059 ↗
15. A novel site selection approach for Co-location of petrol-hydrogen fueling stations using a game theory-based multi-criteria decision-making model10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.076 ↗
16. An integrated MCDM model with enhanced decision support in transport safety using machine learning optimization10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112286 ↗
17. A new model to design a product under redundancy allocation problem and MCDM10.1007/s13198-024-02613-3 ↗
18. The current and future states of MCDM methods in sustainable supply chain risk assessment10.1007/s10668-023-04200-1 ↗
19. Ferdous, J., Bensebaa, F., Milani, A.S., Hewage, K., Bhowmik, P., and Pelletier, N. (2024). Development of a generic decision tree for the integration of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and multi-objective optimization (MOO) methods under uncertainty to facilitate sustainability assessment: A methodical review. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16072684 ↗
20. Wang, X.J., and Wang, L.L. (2026). An integrated AHP–CRITIC–VIKOR decision framework for engineering design and evaluation of children’s scooters. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16094179 ↗
21. A novel approach to flood risk assessment: Synergizing with geospatial based MCDM-AHP model, multicollinearity, and sensitivity analysis in the Lower Brahmaputra Floodplain, Assam10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142985 ↗
22. Evaluating seismic risk by MCDM and machine learning for the eastern coast of India10.1007/s10661-024-12615-0 ↗
23. Strategic evaluation of urban electric vehicles charging infrastructure in budapest using integrated multi-criteria methods10.1007/978-3-032-13898-9_34 ↗
24. Chen, B., Zang, Z.H., Xiao, Y.C., Ding, H.Y., Lin, S., and Dong, M. (2025). Research on the AHP–EWM–VIKOR Model and Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Selecting Sites for Artificial Caverns in CAES. Processes, 13.10.3390/pr13124048 ↗
25. A novel approach for agricultural carbon emission reduction by integrating fermatean neutrosophic set with WINGS and AHP-EWM10.1038/s41598-024-84423-y ↗
26. A decision support system for supplier quality evaluation based on MCDM-aggregation and machine learning10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122746 ↗
27. Evaluation of sustainable manufacturing performance—A case illustration with multistakeholder perspective10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142368 ↗
28. Life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable building parts: Criteria, methods, and application10.1007/s11367-024-02331-9 ↗
29. Shi, H.F., Li, F.Y., Jia, K.M., Ma, S.J., and Zhang, X.P. (2026). Effects of target material properties on acceleration characteristics during sequential multiple-target impacts based on quantitative prediction models. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16115706 ↗
30. Battery inconsistency evaluation based on hierarchical weight fusion and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method10.1016/j.est.2024.110878 ↗
31. Review of experimental investigation of concrete target to resist missile impact in large velocity range
32. Study on the effect of load on the structural response of projectile during penetration process10.1038/s41598-025-98561-4 ↗
33. Bendat, J.S., and Piersol, A.G. (2010). Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, John Wiley & Sons. [4th ed.].10.1002/9781118032428 ↗
34. Generalization of spectral flatness measure for non-Gaussian linear processes10.1109/LSP.2004.831663 ↗
35. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
36. Application of time–frequency entropy method based on Hilbert–Huang transform to gear fault diagnosis10.1016/j.measurement.2007.03.004 ↗
37. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process
38. Effectiveness of entropy weight method in decision-making
39. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H ↗
40. Sparse large-scale high-order fuzzy cognitive maps guided by spearman correlation coefficient10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112253 ↗
41. Mussabayev, R. (2024). Optimizing euclidean distance computation. Mathematics, 12.10.20944/preprints202410.0922.v1 ↗
42. Sensitivity analysis of the INRA 2018 feeding system for ruminants by hybrid local and global approaches: Comparing the contribution of dietary input variables to multiple response prediction in dairy cattle10.3168/jds.2024-25297 ↗
43. Global sensitivity analysis of correlated uncertainties in life cycle assessment10.1111/jiec.70036 ↗
44. Control problems of grey systems10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X ↗
45. Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3 ↗
46. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 ↗