Missing Tooth Height Map Prediction via CBAM-Enhanced Conditional Pix2Pix with Sobel Edge Loss
Source abstract
Abstract
Personalized reconstruction of missing-tooth morphology is a key problem in digital prosthodontics. The main challenge is to generate results that are consistent with the patient’s local dentition, the morphology of the contralateral teeth, and anatomically plausible occlusal details. Although several deep learning-based methods have been proposed for dental restoration, existing approaches still have limitations, including insufficient use of patient-specific contextual information, oversmoothed boundary structures in the generated results, and relatively high model complexity. To address these limitations, this study proposes a CBAM-Sobel conditional Pix2Pix framework, termed CS-cPix2Pix, for predicting the height map of a missing tooth from height projection maps of the contralateral teeth and adjacent teeth. The framework uses height projection maps of a three-tooth contralateral region and an adjacent-tooth region as conditional inputs. A U-Net generator is adopted to learn the mapping from the input conditions to the target missing-tooth height map, and a convolutional block attention module is introduced in the encoder to enhance feature representation in key morphological regions. Furthermore, a Sobel edge loss is incorporated in addition to the adversarial loss and L1 reconstruction loss to constrain the local gradient structure of the generated height map and reduce oversmoothing of occlusal edges, grooves, and ridges. Experimental results show that CS-cPix2Pix achieves better overall quantitative performance than the baseline Pix2Pix model and multiple ablation models, especially in terms of PSNR, FSIM, IoU, and Sobel-L1. Under the current experimental setting, the proposed method generates missing-tooth height maps with clearer boundaries and more continuous structures, and it supports relatively stable reconstruction of three-dimensional occlusal surface meshes from the predicted height maps. However, the present model development still mainly relies on a single public orthodontic dental dataset and focuses primarily on teeth numbered 4, 5, and 6. Therefore, the generalization of the proposed method to other tooth positions, other scanners, different populations, and different acquisition conditions still requires further verification.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Computer Science and Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Revolutionizing CAD/CAM-based restorative dental processes and materials with artificial intelligence: A concise narrative review10.7717/peerj.17793 ↗
2. Artificial neural networks development in prosthodontics-a systematic mapping review10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105385 ↗
3. Kong, H.J., and Kim, Y.L. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in dental crown prosthesis: A scoping review. BMC Oral Health, 24.10.1186/s12903-024-04657-0 ↗
4. Generative deep learning approaches for the design of dental restorations: A narrative review10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104988 ↗
5. Personalized design technique for the dental occlusal surface based on conditional generative adversarial networks10.1002/cnm.3321 ↗
6. Efficient computer-aided design of dental inlay restoration: A deep adversarial framework10.1109/TMI.2021.3077334 ↗
7. A dual discriminator adversarial learning approach for dental occlusal surface reconstruction10.1155/2022/1933617 ↗
8. DCPR-GAN: Dental crown prosthesis restoration using two-stage generative adversarial networks10.1109/JBHI.2021.3119394 ↗
9. Tooth morphology, internal fit, occlusion and proximal contacts of dental crowns designed by deep learning-based dental software: A comparative study10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104830 ↗
10. Deep learning-designed implant-supported posterior crowns: Assessing time efficiency, tooth morphology, emergence profile, occlusion, and proximal contacts10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105142 ↗
11. Artificial Intelligence-Driven automated design of anterior and posterior crowns under diverse occlusal scenarios10.1111/jerd.70029 ↗
12. Fit accuracy of complete crowns fabricated by generative artificial intelligence design: A comparative clinical study10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.224 ↗
13. Jin, X., Wang, S., Hu, J., Xu, X., Shi, Y., Yu, H., Wang, J., Li, K., Cheng, X., and Shao, M. (2023). Automated tooth crown design with optimized shape and biomechanics properties. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11.10.3389/fbioe.2023.1216651 ↗
14. Lessard, O., Guibault, F., Keren, J., and Cheriet, F. (2022, January 28–31). Dental restoration using a multi-resolution deep learning approach. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Kolkata, India.10.1109/ISBI52829.2022.9761622 ↗
15. Hosseinimanesh, G., Ghadiri, F., Guibault, F., Cheriet, F., and Keren, J. (2023). From mesh completion to AI designed crown. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-43996-4_53 ↗
16. Yang, S., Han, J., Lim, S.H., Yoo, J.Y., Kim, S., Song, D., Kim, S., Kim, J.M., and Yi, W.J. (2024). Dcrownformer: Morphology-aware point-to-mesh generation transformer for dental crown prosthesis from 3d scan data of antagonist and preparation teeth. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-72089-5_11 ↗
17. Kubík, T., Guibault, F., Španěl, M., and Lombaert, H. (2025). ToothForge: Automatic Dental Shape Generation Using Synchronized Spectral Embeddings. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-96625-5_21 ↗
18. Bae, J., Son, M.H., Peng, J., Qu, W., Chen, W., Qiu, Z., Li, K., Chen, X., Lin, Y., and Chen, H. (2025). CrownGen: Patient-customized Crown Generation via Point Diffusion Model. arXiv.
19. Isola, P., Zhu, J.Y., Zhou, T., and Efros, A.A. (2017, January 21–26). Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.632 ↗
20. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.Y., and Kweon, I.S. (2018, January 8–14). Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗
21. A 3D dental model dataset with pre/post-orthodontic treatment for automatic tooth alignment10.1038/s41597-024-04138-7 ↗
22. Automatic tooth arrangement with joint features of point and mesh representations via diffusion probabilistic models10.1016/j.cagd.2024.102293 ↗
23. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
24. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 ↗
25. FSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730 ↗
26. Gal, Y., and Ghahramani, Z. (2016, January 20–22). Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, NY, USA.
27. Deep learning-based automated detection of the dental crown finish line: An accuracy study10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.018 ↗