Evaluating the Impact of Data Normalization on Probability Distributions
Source abstract
Abstract
Identification of data distribution and data normalization are fundamental steps in data pre-processing and statistical modeling. Probability distribution identification is essential for selecting an appropriate statistical model, whereas normalization transforms data into a comparable scale to improve the performance of machine learning algorithms. Although normalization techniques are extensively used in data pre-processing, they are generally applied without examining their impact on the underlying probability distribution of the data. This study systematically investigates the influence of normalization methods on probability distribution behavior and distributional transformation. In this work, datasets derived from four popular probability distributions—Gaussian, Exponential, Weibull, and Lognormal—are subjected to fourteen different normalizing approaches. Following normalization, statistical goodness-of-fit metrics and estimated distributional parameters are used to refit the converted observations into nine potential probability distributions. The suggested methodology offers a comparative examination of how different normalization techniques affect the data’s probabilistic properties, parameter estimation behavior, and distributional structure. The study further identifies normalization-specific distributional transition behavior and validates the results using independent univariate subsets of a publicly available real-world dataset. The experimental results show that normalization can significantly alter the original probability distribution: ED, WD, and LD datasets show significant distributional changes under several normalization methods, while GD-distributed data largely preserve their normality under TH, HT, LS, and PNN normalization techniques. While GD data mainly maintain their normality under TH, HT, LS, and PNN normalization approaches, ED, WD, and LD datasets show significant distributional shifts with various normalization procedures. The work uses separate univariate subsets of a publicly accessible real-world dataset to validate the results and further finds distributional transition behavior particular to normalization. This work’s primary contribution is the development of a methodical distribution-aware normalization analysis methodology that links probabilistic modeling behavior with data pre-processing. The results offer useful information for choosing appropriate normalizing methods in applications related to machine learning, statistical inference, risk analysis, Monte-Carlo simulation, and predictive modeling, which enhances the interpretability and dependability of the models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning and Data Classification · Simulation Techniques and Applications · Data Quality and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mathematics, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal 148106, Punjab, India
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal 148106, Punjab, India
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data10.1080/00401706.1979.10489750 ↗
2. Statistical normalization and back propagation for classification
3. Normal distributions
4. Scaling and normalization effects in NMR spectroscopic metabonomic data sets10.1021/ac0519312 ↗
5. Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524 ↗
6. Some examples of the application of the lognormal distribution in radiation protection
7. Evidence for the exponential distribution of income in the USA10.1007/PL00011112 ↗
8. Alam, M.A., Emura, K., Farnham, C., and Yuan, J. (2018). Best-fit probability distributions and return periods for maximum monthly rainfall in Bangladesh. Climate, 6.10.3390/cli6010009 ↗
9. A generalized modified Weibull distribution for lifetime modeling10.1016/j.csda.2008.08.023 ↗
10. Feature normalization and likelihood-based similarity measures for image retrieval10.1016/S0167-8655(00)00112-4 ↗
11. Importance of input data normalization for the application of neural networks to complex industrial problems10.1109/23.589532 ↗
12. Hsu, C.W., Chang, C.C., and Lin, C.J. (2003). A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification, National Taiwan University. Available online: https://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf.
13. Three-parameter lognormal distribution model for soil water retention10.1029/93WR02931 ↗
14. A study of Weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.003 ↗
15. Two regression methods for estimation of a two-parameter Weibull distribution for reliability of dental materials10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.014 ↗
16. Choosing the best fit probability distribution in rainfall design analysis for Pulau Pinang, Malaysia10.1007/s40808-022-01668-0 ↗
17. Feature level fusion of hand and face biometrics
18. Ekenel, H.K., and Stiefelhagen, R. (2006). Analysis of local appearance-based face recognition: Effects of feature selection and feature normalization. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW’06), IEEE.10.1109/CVPRW.2006.29 ↗
19. Van den Berg, R.A., Hoefsloot, H.C., Westerhuis, J.A., Smilde, A.K., and Van der Werf, M.J. (2006). Centering, scaling, and transformations: Improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genom., 7.10.1186/1471-2164-7-142 ↗
20. Impact of data normalization on stock index forecasting
21. Pan, J., Zhuang, Y., and Fong, S. (2016). The impact of data normalization on stock market prediction: Using SVM and technical indicators. Proceedings of the Soft Computing in Data Science: Second International Conference, SCDS 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 21–22 September 2016, Springer. Proceedings 2.
22. A method of SVM with normalization in intrusion detection10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.040 ↗
23. Investigating the impact of data normalization methods on predicting electricity consumption in a building using different artificial neural network models10.1016/j.scs.2024.105570 ↗
24. Comparison of Min–Max normalization and Z-score normalization in the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm to test the accuracy of types of breast cancer
25. Analisis performa normalisasi data untuk klasifikasi K-nearest neighbor pada dataset penyakit10.14421/jiska.2024.9.3.178-191 ↗
26. Amorim, L.B.V., Cavalcanti, G.D.C., and Cruz, R.M.O. (2022). The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performance. arXiv.
27. Renewable energy product competitiveness: Evidence from the United States, China and India10.1016/j.energy.2022.123614 ↗
28. A review of normalization and differential abundance methods for microbiome counts data10.1002/wics.1586 ↗
29. On the effects of data normalization for domain adaptation on EEG data10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106205 ↗
30. Generalized exponential distribution: Different method of estimations10.1080/00949650108812098 ↗
31. Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Mech.10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
32. Data distribution: Normal or abnormal?10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e35 ↗
33. Balakrishnan, K. (1996). Exponential Distribution: Theory, Methods and Applications, CRC Press.
34. On the generalization of the likelihood function and the likelihood principle
35. The Akaike information criterion: Background, derivation, properties, application, interpretation, and refinements10.1002/wics.1460 ↗
36. A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection10.1177/0049124199027003002 ↗
37. The performance of the likelihood ratio test when the model is incorrect10.1214/aos/1176344003 ↗
38. Hampel, F., Ronchetti, E., Rousseeuw, P., and Stahel, W. (1986). Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions, Wiley Online Library.
39. Rey, W.J. (2012). Introduction to Robust and Quasi-Robust Statistical Methods, Springer Science & Business Media.
40. Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00842.x ↗
41. Newey, W.K., and West, K.D. (1987). Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation. Int. Econ. Rev., 777–787.10.2307/2526578 ↗
42. The estimation of the mean squared error of small-area estimators10.1080/01621459.1990.10475320 ↗
43. Han, J., Pei, J., and Tong, H. (2022). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann.
44. Hemoglobin normalization outperforms other methods for standardizing dried blood spot metabolomics: A comparative study10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158716 ↗
45. Scaling techniques to enhance two-dimensional correlation spectra10.1016/j.molstruc.2007.12.026 ↗
46. Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification-and regression-based QSARs10.1289/ehp.5758 ↗
47. Preprocessing of analytical profiles in the presence of homoscedastic or heteroscedastic noise10.1021/ac00073a010 ↗
48. Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.012 ↗
49. Theodoridis, S., and Koutroumbas, K. (2006). Pattern Recognition, Elsevier.
50. Large-scale evaluation of multimodal biometric authentication using state-of-the-art systems10.1109/TPAMI.2005.57 ↗
51. Cabello-Solorzano, K., Ortigosa de Araujo, I., Peña, M., Correia, L.J., and Tallón-Ballesteros, A. (2023). The impact of data normalization on the accuracy of machine learning algorithms: A comparative analysis. International Conference on Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-42536-3_33 ↗
52. DeGroot, M.H., and Schervish, M.J. (2012). Probability and Statistics, Pearson. [4th ed.].
53. van der Laan, M.J., and Rose, S. (2023). Why machine learning cannot ignore maximum likelihood estimation. Handbook of Matching and Weighting Adjustments for Causal Inference, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9781003102670-22 ↗
54. A brief review of tests for normality10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.12 ↗
55. A comparison of various tests of normality10.1080/10629360600678310 ↗
56. The stabilized probability plot10.1093/biomet/70.1.11 ↗
57. Tsanas, A., and Xifara, A. (2012). Energy efficiency. UCI Mach. Learn. Repos.