Heterogeneous Graph Structure Optimization with Dual-View Contrastive Learning for Fraud Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Fraud detection on multi-relational graphs is challenging because real-world fraud-related data often contains heterogeneous relations, noisy structures, and imbalanced labels. Existing GNN-based methods usually rely on predefined graph structures, but real-world financial graphs often contain noisy, redundant, or missing relations, which undermine neighborhood aggregation and message passing. In addition, single-view learning is insufficient to capture both local structural patterns and high-order semantic dependencies, limiting performance in complex fraud scenarios. To address this issue, we propose HGSO-DVCL, a heterogeneous graph structure optimization framework with dual-view contrastive learning. The framework performs type-aware structure optimization for each relation subgraph and integrates optimized graphs with the original structure through channel attention. A dual-view encoder then learns complementary representations from the network schema view and the meta-path view, while contrastive learning promotes consistency and complementarity between the two perspectives. An end-to-end objective jointly optimizes fraud classification, structure regularization, and contrastive alignment. Experiments on public multi-relational fraud detection benchmarks show that HGSO-DVCL achieves strong and competitive performance, while ablation and sensitivity studies support the effectiveness and stability of the proposed framework under the evaluated benchmark settings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Business, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China
School of Finance, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China
Funding
Key Laboratory of Data Protection and Intelligent Management, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Artificial intelligence and financial fraud10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102830 ↗
2. Financial fraud detection using graph neural networks: A systematic review10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122156 ↗
3. Cheng, D., Zou, Y., Xiang, S., and Jiang, C. (2025). Graph neural networks for financial fraud detection: A review. Front. Comput. Sci., 19.10.1007/s11704-024-40474-y ↗
4. Hacker group identification based on dynamic heterogeneous graph node update10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111587 ↗
5. Unknown web attack threat detection based on large language model10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112905 ↗
6. Duan, M., Zheng, T., Gao, Y., Wang, G., Feng, Z., and Wang, X. (2024, January 20–27). Dga-gnn: Dynamic grouping aggregation gnn for fraud detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1609/aaai.v38i10.29067 ↗
7. Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: A multidisciplinary review of the literature10.1007/s11142-017-9435-x ↗
8. Known unknowns: How much financial misconduct is detected and deterred?10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101389 ↗
9. Fraud and abuse in the paycheck protection program? Evidence from investment advisory firms10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106444 ↗
10. On the failure of mutual fund industry regulation10.1016/j.ememar.2018.11.010 ↗
11. Securing transactions: A hybrid dependable ensemble machine learning model using IHT-LR and grid search10.1186/s42400-024-00221-z ↗
12. Khalid, A.R., Owoh, N., Uthmani, O., Ashawa, M., Osamor, J., and Adejoh, J. (2024). Enhancing credit card fraud detection: An ensemble machine learning approach. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 8.10.3390/bdcc8010006 ↗
13. An intelligent approach to detect and predict online fraud transaction using XGBoost algorithm
14. LightGBM model for detecting fraud in online financial transactions10.54097/xw0bng93 ↗
15. Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms and data balancing techniques for credit card fraud detection10.1016/j.procs.2024.10.294 ↗
16. A novel heuristic-based selective ensemble prediction method for digital financial fraud risk10.1109/TEM.2024.3385298 ↗
17. Bayesian optimization driven strategy for detecting credit card fraud with extremely randomized trees10.1016/j.mex.2024.103055 ↗
18. A novel approach based on XGBoost classifier and Bayesian optimization for credit card fraud detection
19. Credit card fraud detection based on deep learning models10.58496/MJCSC/2024/016 ↗
20. Yu, C., Xu, Y., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Jin, Y., and Zhu, M. (2024). Credit card fraud detection using advanced transformer model. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Metaverse Computing, Networking, and Applications (MetaCom), IEEE.10.1109/MetaCom62920.2024.00064 ↗
21. Mienye, I.D., and Swart, T.G. (2024). A hybrid deep learning approach with generative adversarial network for credit card fraud detection. Technologies, 12.10.3390/technologies12100186 ↗
22. Du, H., Lv, L., Wang, H., and Guo, A. (2024). A novel method for detecting credit card fraud problems. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0294537 ↗
23. A suspicious financial transaction detection model using autoencoder and risk-based approach10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3399824 ↗
24. DeLise, T. (2023). Deep semi-supervised anomaly detection for finding fraud in the futures market. arXiv.
25. Duan, Y., Zhang, G., Wang, S., Peng, X., Wang, Z., Mao, J., Wu, H., Jiang, X., and Wang, K. (2024). CaT-GNN: Enhancing credit card fraud detection via causal temporal graph neural networks. arXiv.
26. Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, Z., Li, W., Feng, S., Ma, Z., Sun, Y., Yu, D., Dong, F., and Jin, J. (2023). Label information enhanced fraud detection against low homophily in graphs. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, ACM.10.1145/3543507.3583373 ↗
27. Wan, F., and Li, P. (2024). A novel money laundering prediction model based on a dynamic graph convolutional neural network and long short-term memory. Symmetry, 16.10.3390/sym16030378 ↗
28. CoSemiGNN: Blockchain fraud detection with dynamic graph neural networks based on co-association of semi-supervised10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129853 ↗
29. Pan, J., Liu, Y., Zheng, X., Zheng, Y., Liew, A.W.-C., Li, F., and Pan, S. (March, January 25). A label-free heterophily-guided approach for unsupervised graph fraud detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
30. Subgraph patterns enhanced graph neural network for fraud detection
31. Wu, B., Yao, X., Zhang, B., Chao, K.M., and Li, Y. (2023). SplitGNN: Spectral graph neural network for fraud detection against heterophily. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM.10.1145/3583780.3615067 ↗
32. Aschi, M., Bonura, S., Masi, N., Messina, D., and Profeta, D. (2022). Cybersecurity and fraud detection in financial transactions. Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Digital Finance: Increasing Personalization and Trust in Digital Finance Using Big Data and AI, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-94590-9_15 ↗
33. Web Page Tampering Detection Based on Dynamic Temporal Graph Pre-training10.1109/TDSC.2025.3623257 ↗
34. Harnessing heterogeneous information networks: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100633 ↗
35. Realistic synthetic financial transactions for anti-money laundering models10.52202/075280-1300 ↗
36. Zhang, J., Xu, Z., Lv, D., Shi, Z., Shen, D., Jin, J., and Dong, F. (2024, January 20–27). DiG-In-GNN: Discriminative feature guided GNN-based fraud detector against inconsistencies in multi-relation fraud graph. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1609/aaai.v38i8.28785 ↗
37. Semantic Relation Guided Dual-view Contrastive Learning for Session-based Recommendations
38. The distributed intelligent collaboration to uav-assisted vec: Joint position optimization and task scheduling10.1109/JIOT.2025.3547630 ↗
39. Rayana, S., and Akoglu, L. (2015, January 10–13). Collective opinion spam detection: Bridging review networks and metadata. Proceedings of the 21th ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Sydney, NSW, Australia.10.1145/2783258.2783370 ↗
40. McAuley, J.J., and Leskovec, J. (2013, January 13–17). From amateurs to connoisseurs: Modeling the evolution of user expertise through online reviews. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.10.1145/2488388.2488466 ↗
41. Wang, X., Ji, H., Shi, C., Wang, B., Ye, Y., Cui, P., and Yu, P.S. (2019, January 13–17). Heterogeneous graph attention network. Proceedings of the WWW ’19: The World Wide Web Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/3308558.3313562 ↗
42. Ding, Y., Yao, Q., Zhao, H., and Zhang, T. (2021, January 14–18). Diffmg: Differentiable meta graph search for heterogeneous graph neural networks. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, Online.10.1145/3447548.3467447 ↗
43. PC-GNN: Pearson correlation-based graph neural network for recognition of human lower limb activity using sEMG signal10.1109/THMS.2023.3319356 ↗
44. Dou, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, L., Deng, Y., Peng, H., and Yu, P.S. (2020, January 19–23). Enhancing graph neural network-based fraud detectors against camouflaged fraudsters. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, Online.10.1145/3340531.3411903 ↗
45. Shi, F., Cao, Y., Shang, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, C., and Wu, J. (2022, January 25–29). H2-fdetector: A gnn-based fraud detector with homophilic and heterophilic connections. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, Online.10.1145/3485447.3512195 ↗
46. Ding, K., Zhou, Q., Tong, H., and Liu, H. (2021, January 19–23). Few-shot network anomaly detection via cross-network meta-learning. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, Online.10.1145/3442381.3449922 ↗
47. Tang, J., Li, J., Gao, Z., and Li, J. (2022). Rethinking graph neural networks for anomaly detection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR.