journal article·2026-05-23Open access

Determination of Added-Mass Coefficients in Eccentrically Confined Square Cylinders Using Deforming-Mesh and Immersed-Boundary Methods

Bruno Oettinger-Barrientos, Armando Blanco-Alvarez, Gonzalo Tampier

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 11

Abstract

Accurate prediction of hydrodynamic forces on confined oscillating structures is essential in applications related to nuclear engineering, energy systems, offshore devices, and mechanical components subjected to flow-induced vibrations. In this work, two computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methodologies implemented in ANSYS CFX are compared to determine the added-mass coefficients for a square cross-section cylinder confined within a square container: a deforming-mesh method (DMM) and an immersed-boundary method (IBM). Unlike previous studies restricted either to concentric square cylinders or to eccentric configurations treated with potential flow, the present study addresses eccentric confined configurations by solving the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and focuses primarily on the prediction of added mass under strong confinement. Horizontal, vertical, and combined eccentric displacements are analyzed in detail. Mesh-independence, domain-size sensitivity, and temporal-convergence analyses are performed. Results show that both methods provide closely matching added-mass predictions over a wide range of eccentricities, with relative differences typically below 1% for moderate eccentricities, although discrepancies increase under extreme confinement. Relative to the concentric configuration, the added-mass coefficient increases by about 44% for the most eccentric vertical case and by about 87% for the most eccentric corner-approach case. Force decomposition and pressure-field analysis show that this increase is governed primarily by pressure-induced inertial effects, whereas viscous shear plays a secondary role under the conditions considered. From a practical standpoint, the immersed-boundary method reduced the computational time by approximately 92% in the most demanding case.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Escuela de Graduados, Universidad Austral de Chile, General Lagos 2086, Valdivia 5110566, Chile

Instituto de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad Austral de Chile, General Lagos 2086, Valdivia 5110566, Chile

Instituto de Ciencias Navales y Marítimas, Universidad Austral de Chile, General Lagos 2086, Valdivia 5110566, Chile

Funding

Universidad Austral de Chile · ANID IDEA

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Païdoussis, M.P., Price, S.J., and de Langre, E. (2011). Fluid–Structure Interactions: Cross-Flow-Induced Instabilities, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511760792 ↗
2. Blevins, R.D. (1990). Flow-Induced Vibration, Van Nostrand Reinhold. [2nd ed.].
3. Ishii, M., and Hibiki, T. (2011). Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow, Springer. [2nd ed.].10.1007/978-1-4419-7985-8 ↗
4. Flow-induced vibration in power and process plant components10.1115/1.556190 ↗
5. Sumer, B.M., and Fredsøe, J. (2006). Hydrodynamics Around Cylindrical Structures, World Scientific.10.1142/6248 ↗
6. A numerical investigation of the hydrodynamic performance of a bottom-hinged oscillating wave energy converter
7. Folley, M. (2016). Numerical Modelling of Wave Energy Converters, Academic Press.
8. Vortex shedding from oscillating bluff bodies10.1146/annurev.fl.16.010184.001211 ↗
9. Brennen, C.E. (1982). A Review of Added Mass and Fluid Inertial Forces, Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory. Technical Report CR 82.010.
10. Newman, J.N. (1977). Marine Hydrodynamics, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4443.001.0001 ↗
11. Forces on cylinders and spheres in a sinusoidally oscillating fluid10.1115/1.3423549 ↗
12. The force exerted by surface waves on piles10.2118/950149-G ↗
13. Added mass estimation of square sections coupled with a liquid using finite element method10.1016/j.net.2016.07.010 ↗
14. Estimation of added effects and their frequency dependence in various fluid–structure interaction problems10.1007/s40430-024-05175-4 ↗
15. Donea, J., and Huerta, A. (2003). Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0470013826 ↗
16. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart10.1016/0021-9991(77)90100-0 ↗
17. The immersed boundary method10.1017/S0962492902000077 ↗
18. Immersed boundary methods10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175743 ↗
19. A stable and explicit fluid–structure interaction solver based on lattice-Boltzmann and immersed boundary methods10.1016/j.cma.2024.116777 ↗
20. A formulation for fluid–structure interaction problems with immersed flexible solids: Application to splitters subjected to flow past cylinders with different cross-sections10.1016/j.cma.2024.117306 ↗
21. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of a near-wall rectangular cylinder in an oscillatory flow10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117776 ↗
22. Near-wall effect on vortex dynamics in the flow around a rectangular cylinder10.1017/jfm.2025.365 ↗
23. Blanco-Alvarez, A. (1995). Quelques Aspects de L’écoulement d’un Fluide Visqueux Autour d’une Bulle Déformable: Une Analyse par Simulation Directe. [Ph.D. Thesis, IMPT].
24. Ansys, Inc. (2024). CFX-Solver Modeling Guide, Section 1.2.2: Mesh Deformation, Release 2024 R2, Ansys Help, Ansys, Inc.
25. Ansys, Inc. (2024). CFX-Solver Modeling Guide, Chapter 11: Rigid Body Modeling, Release 2024 R2, Ansys Help, Ansys, Inc.