Autonomous Mobile Robot Selection in Smart Warehouses Considering Cybersecurity and Integration Requirements
Source abstract
Abstract
Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) are increasingly used in warehouse intralogistics to improve material flow, flexibility, productivity, and operational continuity. However, selecting an appropriate AMR is no longer limited to mechanical performance or acquisition cost, since modern warehouse robots operate as networked cyber-physical systems that must interact with enterprise software, fleet management platforms, communication infrastructures, and cybersecurity mechanisms. This study proposes an integrated Pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for evaluating AMR alternatives in warehouse operations by jointly considering economic, technical, physical, software-related, integration-oriented, and security-related criteria. Expert judgments obtained from eight specialists, including four academics and four private-sector professionals, were modeled using Pythagorean fuzzy numbers to capture uncertainty and hesitation in linguistic assessments. The Pythagorean Fuzzy Indifference Threshold-Based Attribute Ratio Analysis (PF-ITARA) method was employed to determine criterion weights based on threshold-sensitive discrimination among alternatives, while Pythagorean Fuzzy VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (PF-VIKOR) was used to rank four AMR alternatives according to a compromise solution logic. The results show that investment cost, maneuverability, total cost of ownership, integration and validation requirements, and ease of programming and commissioning are the most influential criteria. Cybersecurity-related criteria, particularly data confidentiality, system integrity, monitoring and incident response readiness, authentication control, and role-based access control, also received notable importance levels. Among the evaluated alternatives, MiR250 achieved the best overall performance and emerged as the most suitable compromise solution, followed by OMRON LD-250, HIKROBOT Forklift AGV, and KUKA KMP 600-S diffDrive. The proposed framework provides a transparent and practically applicable decision-support tool for AMR procurement by integrating operational performance, digital interoperability, and cybersecurity readiness into a unified evaluation structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey
College of Science and Engineering, Hamad bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar
Department of Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Topkapi University, 34087 Istanbul, Turkey
Quality Coordination Office, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, 35620 İzmir, Turkey
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. A Revised Weighted Sum Decision Model for Robot Selection10.1016/0360-8352(95)00167-0 ↗
2. Evaluating and Selecting Investments in Industrial Robots10.1080/002075499189718 ↗
3. Decision-Making and Performance Measurement Models with Applications to Robot Selection10.1016/S0360-8352(99)00146-1 ↗
4. Robot Selection by a Multiple Criteria Complex Proportional Assessment Method under an Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environment10.1007/s00170-014-5849-9 ↗
5. Development of a Decision Support System for Robot Selection10.1016/j.rcim.2012.11.008 ↗
6. Robot Evaluation and Selection Part A: An Integrated Review and Annotated Taxonomy10.1007/s00170-013-5525-5 ↗
7. Robot Evaluation and Selection Part B: A Comparative Analysis10.1007/s00170-013-5526-4 ↗
8. Robot Selection by Using Generalized Interval-Valued Fuzzy Numbers with TOPSIS10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.002 ↗
9. An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Based Approach for Robot Selection Considering Objective and Subjective Criteria10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.025 ↗
10. Extension of PROMETHEE for Robot Selection Decision Making10.1108/BIJ-08-2015-0081 ↗
11. Developing an MCDM Method for Robot Selection with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets10.1016/j.rcim.2015.04.007 ↗
12. 2-Tuple Linguistic q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy CODAS Approach and Its Application in Arc Welding Robot Selection10.3934/math.2022966 ↗
13. Robot Selection Using an Integrated MAGDM Model Based on ELECTRE Method and Linguistic Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Information10.1155/2022/1444486 ↗
14. Optimizing Industrial Robot Selection Using Novel Trigonometric Pythagorean Fuzzy Normal Aggregation Operators10.1007/s40747-025-02083-5 ↗
15. Analyzing Industrial Robot Selection Based on a Fuzzy Neural Network under Triangular Fuzzy Numbers10.1038/s41598-025-14505-y ↗
16. Einstein Aggregation Operators for Pythagorean Fuzzy Soft Sets with Their Application in Multiattribute Group Decision-Making
17. An Integrated Group Decision-Making Technique under Interval-Valued Probabilistic Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy Information and Its Application to the Selection of Cloud Storage Provider10.3934/math.20231031 ↗
18. Cobot Selection Using Hybrid AHP-TOPSIS Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making Technique for Fuel Filter Assembly Process10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26374 ↗
19. Tran, N.-T., Trinh, V.-L., and Chung, C.-K. (2024). An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Industrial Robot Selection. Processes, 12.10.3390/pr12081723 ↗
20. Enhancing Industrial Robot Selection through a Hybrid Novel Approach: Integrating CRITIC-VIKOR Method with Probabilistic Uncertain Linguistic q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy10.1007/s10462-024-11001-z ↗
21. Fuzzy Extended VIKOR-Based Mobile Robot Selection Model for Hospital Pharmacy10.1177/1729881418787315 ↗
22. Review of Autonomous Mobile Robots in Intralogistics: State-of-the-Art, Limitations and Research Gaps10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.187 ↗
23. Auslagerbarkeit von Funktionen autonomer mobiler Roboter in eine Cloud
24. A Review of Li-Ion Batteries for Autonomous Mobile Robots: Perspectives and Outlook for the Future10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231943 ↗
25. Identifikation von Anforderungen Und Potenzialen Für Neuartige Standardisierte Schnittstellen Für FTS Auf Der Basis Des VDA 5050-Konzepts
26. Evaluation of Autonomous Robot Alternatives for Warehouse Optimization Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
27. Kasprzyczak, L., Manowska, A., and Dźwiarek, M. (2025). Cybersecurity Requirements for Industrial Machine Control Systems. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15031267 ↗
28. An Integrated Fuzzy Decision-Making Framework for Autonomous Mobile Robot Selection: Balancing Subjective and Objective Measures with Fuzzy TOPSIS and Picture Fuzzy CoCoSo Approach10.1080/01605682.2025.2486705 ↗
29. A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Robot Selection10.1016/0736-5845(93)90040-Q ↗
30. Cyber Security of Robots: A Comprehensive Survey
31. Fuzzy Sets10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
32. Atanassov, K.T. (1999). Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Elsevier.10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_2 ↗
33. Yager, R.R. (2013, January 24–28). Pythagorean Fuzzy Subsets. Proceedings of the 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, IFSA/NAFIPS 2013, Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375 ↗
34. Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets10.1002/int.21676 ↗
35. A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making10.1142/S0219622016500012 ↗
36. An Integrated Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA-COPRAS Framework to Prioritise the Solutions for Mitigating Industry 4.0 Risks10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124412 ↗
37. A Study on the Ranking Performance of Some MCDM Methods for Industrial Robot Selection Problems
38. Applying Edas as an Applicable Mcdm Method for Industrial Robot Selection
39. A New Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (Codas) Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
40. Wang, C.-N., Nguyen, V.T., Duong, D.H., and Thai, H.T.N. (2018). A Hybrid Fuzzy Analysis Network Process (FANP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Approaches for Solid Waste to Energy Plant Location Selection in Vietnam. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8071100 ↗
41. Jagtap, M., Karande, P., and Athawale, V.M. (2021, January 16–18). Rank Assessment of Robots Using M-Polar Fuzzy ELECTRE-I Algorithm. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangalore, India.10.46254/IN01.20210073 ↗
42. Rashid, T., Ali, A., and Chu, Y.-M. (2021). Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM Methodology for Optimal Industrial Robot Selection. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0246738 ↗
43. Site Selection for Plastic Recycling Plant in a Circular Economy Context Using Fuzzy Decision-Making System10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104365 ↗
44. Evaluating Urban Mobility Strategies to Foster Inclusive Urban Regeneration for Vulnerable Groups10.1016/j.cities.2026.106932 ↗
45. Integrating Quantum Mechanics and Fuzzy Logic for Enhanced MCDM: A Case Study on Robot Evaluation
46. Smart Maintenance Architecture for Automated Guided Vehicles10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.020 ↗
47. Selection of an industrial robot for assembly jobs using multi-criteria decision making methods
48. A Rough Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Approach for Arc Welding Robot Selection
49. A Method for Reliability Detection of Automated Guided Vehicle Based on Timed Automata10.1080/21642583.2021.1961328 ↗
50. Tong, Q., Ming, X., and Zhang, X. (2023). Construction of Sustainable Digital Factory for Automated Warehouse Based on Integration of ERP and WMS. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15021022 ↗
51. Lopes, D., Pereira, T., Gonçalves, A., Cunha, F., Lopes, F., Antunes, J., Santos, V., Coutinho, F., Barreiros, J., and Durães, J. (2025). Integrated Fleet Management of Mobile Robots for Enhancing Industrial Efficiency: A Case Study on Interoperability in Multi-Brand Environments Within the Automotive Sector. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15137235 ↗
52. Beregi, R., Pedone, G., Háy, B., and Váncza, J. (2021). Manufacturing Execution System Integration through the Standardization of a Common Service Model for Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167581 ↗
53. A Framework to Integrate Mobile Manipulators as Cyber–Physical Systems into Existing Production Systems in the Context of Industry 4.010.1016/j.robot.2023.104526 ↗
54. Testing, Validation, and Verification of Robotic and Autonomous Systems: A Systematic Review10.1145/3542945 ↗
55. Stouffer, K., Pease, M., Tang, C., Zimmerman, T., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Hahn, A., Saravia, S., Sherule, A., and Thompson, M. (2023). Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security, NIST SP 800-82r3.10.6028/NIST.SP.800-82r3 ↗
56. Nelson, A., Rekhi, S., Souppaya, M., and Scarfone, K. (2025). Incident Response Recommendations and Considerations for Cybersecurity Risk Management: A CSF 2.0 Community Profile, NIST SP 800-61r3.10.6028/NIST.SP.800-61r3 ↗
57. Kara, B., Ayyildiz, E., Kavus, B.Y., and Karaca, T.K. (2025). Evaluating Cybersecurity Measures for Smart Grids Under Uncertainty: A Picture Fuzzy SWARA–CODAS Approach. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app151910704 ↗
58. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2024). The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, NIST CSWP 29.
59. A Modified Balanced Scorecard Based Hybrid Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP-Topsis Methodology for ATM Site Selection Problem10.1142/S0219622020500017 ↗