Experimental Design and Practice of Vehicle Cabins Based on Passenger Comfort Evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
With the development of autonomous driving and intelligent connected vehicle technologies, the vehicle cabin is shifting from a simple transportation space to an intelligent mobile space integrating infotainment, interaction, and rest, and passenger comfort has gradually become an important factor affecting user experience, system trust, and perceived safety. Focusing on three categories of cabin environmental factors, namely the acoustic, optical, and thermal environments, this study develops an experimental design and comprehensive modeling method for passenger comfort evaluation. First, controlled single-factor experiments were conducted to establish quantitative mapping relationships between physical environmental parameters and subjective comfort ratings. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was then used to determine the weights of each indicator, and a penalty-based aggregation mechanism was introduced to construct a comprehensive comfort evaluation model. Finally, external validation was performed on an independent vehicle platform to examine the model’s applicability and consistency. The results show that acoustic comfort decreases as the sound pressure level increases, whereas optical and thermal comfort exhibit nonlinear behavior with optimal intervals. AHP weight results show that the thermal environment has the highest weight (0.4280), followed by the acoustic environment (0.3305) and the optical environment (0.2415). The external validation results indicate that the proposed model exhibits good predictive consistency across three steady-state operating conditions, with a mean absolute error of 0.122, a root-mean-square error of 0.150, and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.960. The findings show that the penalty-based aggregation model can effectively characterize the limiting-factor effect under the joint action of multiple environmental factors, providing a computable and interpretable evaluation framework for intelligent cockpit environmental control and automotive engineering experimental teaching. The conclusions of this study are mainly applicable to the current experimental platform and steady-state operating conditions, and further validation is still required with more vehicle models, dynamic road scenarios, and complex multi-environment factor disturbances.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Automobile & Transportation, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Automotive Engineering, School of Automobile & Transportation, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
Funding
Key Project of the Special Project on Intelligent Vehicle Industry Collaborative Cultivation of the Higher Education Society of Sichuan Province, China · key Project of Educational and Teaching Reform Research of Xihua University
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Comfort in automated driving: A literature survey and a high-level integrative framework10.1145/3678583 ↗
2. Fully automated driving10.1177/0018720815612319 ↗
3. Gao, F., Ge, X., Li, J., Fan, Y., Li, Y., and Zhao, R. (2024). Intelligent Cockpits for Connected Vehicles: Taxonomy, Architecture, Interaction Technologies, and Future Directions. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24165172 ↗
4. Self-driving carsickness10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.009 ↗
5. Wang, C., Zhao, X., Fu, R., and Li, Z. (2020). Research on the comfort of vehicle passengers considering the vehicle motion state and passenger physiological characteristics: Improving the passenger comfort of autonomous vehicles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17186821 ↗
6. Dillen, N., Ilievski, M., Law, E., Nacke, L.E., Czarnecki, K., and Schneider, O. (2020, January 25–30). Keep calm and ride along: Passenger comfort and anxiety as physiological responses to autonomous driving styles. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1145/3313831.3376247 ↗
7. Comparative analysis of drivers’ vital parameters across varied driving scenarios and experience levels: A pilot study10.1016/j.jth.2025.102088 ↗
8. Passenger comfort assessment via motion complexity analysis for autonomous vehicles10.1186/s10033-025-01289-5 ↗
9. How users of automated vehicles benefit from predictive ambient light displays10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103762 ↗
10. Münder, M., and Carbon, C.-C. (2022). A literature review [2000–2022] on vehicle acoustics: Investigations on perceptual parameters of interior soundscapes in electrified vehicles. Front. Mech. Eng., 8.10.3389/fmech.2022.974464 ↗
11. State-of-the-art thermal comfort models for car cabin Environment10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111825 ↗
12. Berkouk, D., Bouzir, T.A.K., Boucherit, S., Khelil, S., Mahaya, C., Matallah, M.E., and Mazouz, S. (2022). Exploring the multisensory interaction between luminous, thermal and auditory environments through the spatial promenade experience: A case study of a university campus in an oasis settlement. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14074013 ↗
13. The influence of temperature and interior ambient lighting color on nighttime driving performance10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112815 ↗
14. Effect of cabin ventilation rate on ultrafine particle exposure inside automobiles10.1021/es9038209 ↗
15. Categorization for air quality assessment in car cabin10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.015 ↗
16. Russi, L., Guidorzi, P., Pulvirenti, B., Aguiari, D., Pau, G., and Semprini, G. (2022). Air quality and comfort characterisation within an electric vehicle cabin in heating and cooling operations. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22020543 ↗
17. Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in vehicular cabin air – Implications to commuter exposure10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121763 ↗
18. Characterising indoor air quality in private vehicle cabins under unprecedented traffic conditions during COVID-19 lockdown10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111797 ↗
19. A comfort evaluation method based on an intelligent car cockpit10.1002/hfm.20973 ↗
20. Evaluation of vehicle vibration comfort using deep learning10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108634 ↗
21. Study on physiological representation of passenger cognitive comfort: An example with overtaking scenarios
22. Yang, J., Xing, S., Chen, Y., Qiu, R., Hua, C., and Dong, D. (2022). An evaluation model for the comfort of vehicle intelligent cockpits based on passenger experience. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14116827 ↗
23. Standards for passenger comfort in automated vehicles10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103881 ↗
24. Applying AHP for supplier selection in aviation: A multi-criteria decision-making approach10.1504/IJSA.2023.134344 ↗
25. Anastasiadou, K., and Gavanas, N. (2025). Evaluation and selection of public transportation projects in terms of urban sustainability through a multi-criteria decision-support methodology. Future Transp., 5.10.3390/futuretransp5030090 ↗
26. More intelligent and efficient thermal environment management: A hybrid model for occupant-centric thermal comfort monitoring in vehicle cabins10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109866 ↗
27. Occupant-centric cabin thermal sensation assessment system based on low-cost thermal imaging10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111692 ↗
28. Alharasees, O., and Kale, U. (2021, January 25–27). Evaluating total load of aviation operators by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sustainable Aviation, Bangkok, Thailand.
29. A novel online prediction method for vehicle cabin temperature and passenger thermal sensation10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.122853 ↗
30. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
31. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028 ↗
32. Aggregation functions based on penalties10.1016/j.fss.2009.05.012 ↗
33. Predicting and optimizing pure electric vehicle road noise via a locality-sensitive hashing transformer and interval analysis10.1016/j.isatra.2024.11.059 ↗
34. Design and implementation of comfort-quality HVAC sound inside a vehicle cabin10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107940 ↗
35. A systematic review on the influence factors, measurement, and effect of driver workload10.1016/j.aap.2023.107289 ↗
36. Intelligent evaluation of the interior sound quality of electric vehicles10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107684 ↗
37. (2002). Limits and Measurement Methods for Noise Emitted by Accelerating Motor Vehicles (Standard No. GB 1495-2002).
38. Subjective perception analysis of active noise control algorithms in an encapsulated structure: An experimental study10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110823 ↗
39. Integrated lighting ergonomics: A review on the association between non-visual effects of light and ergonomics in the enclosed cabins10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110616 ↗
40. Impact of lighting environment on human performance and prediction modeling of personal visual comfort in enclosed cabins10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171970 ↗
41. (2011). Guideline for Air Quality Assessment of Passenger Car (Standard No. GB/T 27630-2011).
42. (2006). Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Evaluation of Thermal Environments in Vehicles—Part 2: Determination of Equivalent Temperature (Standard No. ISO 14505-2).
43. Research on the thermal comfort of passenger compartment based on the PMV/PPD10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107876 ↗
44. Pant, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Klochkov, Y., and Sharma, H.K. (2022). Consistency indices in analytic hierarchy process: A review. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10081206 ↗
45. Roszkowska, E., and Wachowicz, T. (2024). Impact of Normalization on Entropy-Based Weights in Hellwig’s Method: A Case Study on Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Education Area. Entropy, 26.10.3390/e26050365 ↗
46. Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114186 ↗
47. Understanding the analytic hierarchy process10.1080/00401706.2021.1904744 ↗
48. Human factors and AI in UAV systems: Enhancing operational efficiency through AHP and real-time physiological monitoring10.1007/s10846-024-02188-y ↗
49. Air transport projects quality assessments by analytical hierarchy process (AHP)10.32560/rk.2022.2.6 ↗
50. Alharasees, O., and Kale, U. (2023, January 5–7). Transport operators total load comparison by analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Proceedings of the Electric Aircraft and Autonomous Systems, Warsaw, Poland.10.1007/978-3-031-37299-5_7 ↗
51. Alharasees, O., Zolfaghari, F., Kilikevičius, A., and Kale, U. (2025, January 27–28). Integrating PEAR-based human factors assessment with SEM-AHP for AI-assisted UAV operations. Proceedings of the 2025 New Trends in Aviation Development, Stary Smokovec, Slovakia.10.1109/NTAD67887.2025.11302666 ↗
52. Health effects of transport noise10.1080/01441647.2023.2206168 ↗
53. Research on interaction effect of thermal, light and acoustic environment on human comfort in waiting hall of high-speed railway station10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108494 ↗
54. A Choquet integral based fuzzy logic approach to solve uncertain multi-criteria decision making problem10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113303 ↗
55. Ordered weighted geometric averaging operators for basic uncertain information10.1016/j.ins.2024.120275 ↗
56. Development and applications of penalty-based aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making10.1155/int/6069158 ↗
57. A generalization of stability for families of aggregation operators10.1016/j.fss.2019.01.004 ↗
58. Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies10.1007/s10877-022-00853-x ↗
59. Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model10.1177/09622802231224657 ↗
60. Han, O., Tan, H.W., Julious, S., Sutton, L., Jacques, R., Lee, E., Lewis, J., and Walters, S. (2022). A descriptive study of sample sizes used in agreement studies published in the PubMed repository. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 22.10.1186/s12874-022-01723-5 ↗
61. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x ↗
62. Parker, R.A., Scott, C., Inácio, V., and Stevens, N.T. (2020). Using multiple agreement methods for continuous repeated measures data: A tutorial for practitioners. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 20.10.1186/s12874-020-01022-x ↗
63. How to estimate intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater reliability from planned incomplete data10.1080/00273171.2025.2507745 ↗
64. Bland–Altman methods for comparing methods of measurement and response to criticisms10.1016/j.gloepi.2020.100045 ↗
65. Gerke, O. (2020). Reporting standards for a Bland–Altman agreement analysis: A review of methodological reviews. Diagnostics, 10.10.3390/diagnostics10050334 ↗