Mechanical-impermeability properties and environmental degradation of SBS-modified (asphalt and emulsified asphalt) chip seals and FYT-I coating
Source abstract
Abstract
The effectiveness of waterproof bonding layers is crucial for bridge deck pavements. This study evaluates the mechanical properties, impermeability and economic benefits of three materials: SBS-modified asphalt chip seal, SBS-modified emulsified asphalt chip seal and FYT-I waterproof coating. Under the optimal ratio (1.5 kg/m² asphalt + 6 kg/m² aggregate), SBS-modified asphalt chip seal exhibits superior performance, with shear strength of 0.61 MPa and bonding strength of 0.49 MPa, higher than those of emulsified asphalt chip seal (0.54 MPa shear, 0.45 MPa bonding) and FYT-I (0.57 MPa shear, 0.47 MPa bonding). Shear strength increases linearly with shear rate, rising by 18%–30% relative to 5 mm/min level. This material shows the highest stability due to aggregate interlocking. Environmental testing reveals strength reductions of over 70% at 60°C and nearly 50% under freeze–thaw cycles. Despite such degradation, it maintains the lowest permeability coefficient of 3.36×10−5 cm/s under standard conditions. Although salt freeze–thaw raises permeability by 94%, its high elasticity and aggregate interlocking ensure favorable impermeability. Economic analysis shows that this chip seal has the lowest life-cycle cost, that the emulsified one balances cost and constructability, and that FYT-I coating has the highest long-term cost, offering reference for engineering material selection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2020). AASHTO RP 1-20: Recommended practice for life-cycle cost analysis in highway applications. Washington, D.C: AASHTO.
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.17510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.175 ↗
3. 10.1177/036119810519290010910.1177/0361198105192900109 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.016 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1519700110.3390/ma15197001 ↗
6. 10.1007/s13369-023-07624-z10.1007/s13369-023-07624-z ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.03.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.03.002 ↗
8. DL/T 5362. (2018). Test Code for Hydraulic Asphalt Concrete.
9. 10.1617/s11527-017-1080-010.1617/s11527-017-1080-0 ↗
10. 10.3390/su14231550010.3390/su142315500 ↗
11. GB/T 16777. (2008). Test Methods for Building Waterproof Coatings.
12. GB/T 265. (1988). Petroleum products-Determination of kinematic viscosity and calculation of dynamic viscosity.
13. GB/T 4507. (2014). Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen—Ring-and-Ball Apparatus.
14. GB/T 4508. (2010). Standard Test Method for Ductility of Bitumen.
15. GB/T 4509. (2010). Standard test method for penetration of bitumen.
16. GB/T 5304. (2001). Asphalt Thin-Film Oven Test Method.
17. Gehlot, T., Sankhla, S. S., & Saini, K. K. (2019). Critical review on effect of chloride penetration on concrete and various rapid chloride penetration tests methods. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(2), 648–654.
18. 10.3390/polym1413255810.3390/polym14132558 ↗
19. Guangzhou Caberry waterproof engineering Co. LTD. (2026). FYT-I Waterproof Coating. Available from: http://www.caberry28.com/products/show34944642.html
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000316510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003165 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.09.01310.1016/j.ijprt.2017.09.013 ↗
22. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.304.1210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.304.12 ↗
23. JC/T 408. (2005). Emulsified Asphalt Waterproof Coating.
24. JGJ 55. (2011). Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete.
25. Jiaxing Traffic Engineering Cost Management Station. (2025). Material Price Information (Issue 3 2025). Jiaxing: Jiaxing Traffic Engineering Cost Management Station. Available from: https://zjjcmspublic.oss-cn-hangzhou-zwynet-d01-a.internet.cloud.zj.gov.cn/jcms_files/jcms1/web3031/site/attach/0/785e61adc0114e499d27662091449440.pdf
26. 10.1155/2021/555553510.1155/2021/5555535 ↗
27. JTG E20. (2011). Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering.
28. JTG F40. (2004). Technical Specifications for Construction of Highway Asphalt Pavements.
29. JTG/T 3364-02. (2019). Specifications for Design and Construction of Pavement on Highway Steel Deck Bridge.
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12612010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126120 ↗
31. Nian, T. F. (2019). Interlayer adhesive materials and anti-shearing performance of asphalt pavement on steep slope sections in seasonal frozen soil region. Ph.D. thesis, Lanzhou University of Technology.
32. 10.1617/s11527-020-01600-x10.1617/s11527-020-01600-x ↗
33. 10.1080/10298436.2023.218523910.1080/10298436.2023.2185239 ↗
34. 10.3390/buildings1304096510.3390/buildings13040965 ↗
35. Tang, L., Chen, L. F., Gao, P. W., Chen, P., & Song, J. H. (2022). Interface bond strength of bridge pavement waterproof bond layer under different environmental conditions. Transportation Science & Technology, 5, 100–103.
36. Wang, Y. L., & Wang, Q. M. (2009). Test on anti-permeability performance of composite structure for asphalt concrete bridge pavement. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), 29(3), 64–67.
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.16710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.167 ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1618259310.3390/polym16182593 ↗
39. 10.3390/ma1509305410.3390/ma15093054 ↗
40. 10.3390/buildings1403067210.3390/buildings14030672 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000465610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004656 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0163010.1021/acs.macromol.1c01630 ↗