journal article·2026-12-31Open access

The impact of temperature gradient and JPCP design features on surface roughness and curvature

Hanan Ahmed, Mahdi Masmoudi, Syed Waqar Haider, Christopher Byrum, Hyung Suk Lee, Nizar Lajnef, Lev Khazanovich

Abstract

Surface roughness and deflections in jointed plain concrete pavements are strongly influenced by temperature-induced slab curling and slab–subgrade interaction. This study investigates the effect of slab curvature on ride quality using the equivalent linear thermal gradient concept and a combined framework of Westergaard analytical solutions, ISLAB finite element method simulations, and artificial neural network surrogate modeling. Slab shape backcalculation from pavement profiles using Westergaard theory is systematically compared with FEM-based predictions. Results show that the Westergaard solution underestimates slab deflections and International Roughness Index while overestimating the effective temperature gradient required to match field-measured curvature, primarily due to simplified boundary assumptions that neglect joint discontinuities, finite slab geometry, and slab lift-off under large thermal gradients. FEM-based post-processing captures these additional mechanisms and yields convincing predictions of slab curvature and roughness under thermally critical conditions. An ANN surrogate trained on FEM-generated data (R² > 0.99) predicts wheel-path slab shapes and enables rapid evaluation of large design spaces. Sensitivity analysis indicates that joint-moment transfer and slab thickness govern curling-induced roughness, while joint spacing and subgrade stiffness exert a secondary influence. The proposed framework quantifies slab curling relative to diurnal IRI variability and supports the selection of JPCP design parameters to improve ride quality.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University

Michigan Department of Transportation

Applied Research Associate, Inc

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh

Funding

Michigan Department of Transportation

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (2014). AASHTO M 328 Standard Specification for Inertial Profiler. AASHTO.
2. AASHTO (2019). AASHTO R 43 Standard Specification for Inertial Profiler. AASHTO.
3. 10.3141/1730-0110.3141/1730-01 ↗
4. Byrum, C. R. (2001). The effect of locked-in curvature on PCC pavement. In. long-term performance program: Making something of it: Papers from the international contest on LTPP data analysis 1998-1999. Americal Society of Civil Enigeers, Restin, VA.
5. 10.3141/2094-0910.3141/2094-09 ↗
6. 10.3141/2305-0510.3141/2305-05 ↗
7. Byrum, C. R., Hansen, W., & Kohn, S. (1997). The effect of PCC strength and other parameters on the performance of PCC pavements.
8. Byrum, C. R., Barton, P., D Rollings, R., Ioannides, A., Gemayel, C., & Tayabji, S. (2011). Joint load transfer in concrete airfield pavements: Final report, Innovative Pavement Research Foundation Report IPRF-01-G-002-05-2 (Vol. ASCE. Rosemont, IL.
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000015110.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000151 ↗
10. Huang, Y., & Wang, S. (1974). Finite-element analysis of rigid pavements with partial subgrade contact. Transportation research record, 485, 39–54.
11. Hveem, F. N. (1951). Slab warping affects pavement joint performance. Journal Proceedings, 47(6), 797–808.
12. Hveem, F. N., & Tremper, B. (1957). Some factors influencing shrinkage of concrete pavements. ACI Journal Proceedings, 53(2), 781–789.
13. 10.3141/1684-0810.3141/1684-08 ↗
14. Khazanovich, L. (2000). Application of ISLAB2000 for forensic studies, In. Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on 3D Finite Element for Pavement Analysis, Design, and Research. Charleston, West Virginia 2000.
15. Khazanovich, L., & Gotlif, A. (2003). Evaluation of joint and crack load transfer, US Department of TRansportation, Fedearl Highway Administration.
16. 10.1177/0361198123116715410.1177/03611981231167154 ↗
17. 10.3141/1778-0810.3141/1778-08 ↗
18. Korenev, B., & Chernigovskaya, E. (1962). Analysis of plates on elastic foundation. Gosstroiizdat. Moscow. in Russian.
19. Muslim, H. B., & Haider, S. W. (2021). Impact of seasonal and diurnal profile measurements on surface roughness of rigid Pavements—LTPP SMP study, Airfield and Highway Pavements 2021 (Vol., pp. 240–252). ASCE.10.1061/9780784483503.024 ↗
20. NCHRP (2006). Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (1.1 ed.). Transportation Research Board.
21. Rao, S., & Roesler, J. R. (2005). Characterization of effective built-in curling and concrete pavement cracking on the palmdale test sections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131(4).
22. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57513410.1080/10298436.2011.575134 ↗
23. Tian, K., King, D., Yang, B., Kim, S., Alhasan, A., & Ceylan, H. (2023). Impact of Curling and Warping on Concrete Pavement: Phase II., Transportation Research Record (Vol. Report No. IHRB Project TR-749.
24. Westergaard (1926). Stresses in concrete pavements computed by theoretical analysis—public roads.
25. Westergaard (1927). Analysis of stresses in concrete pavements due to variations of temperature. In. Highway Research Board Proceedings, 6, 201–215.
26. 10.3141/1639-1010.3141/1639-10 ↗
27. 10.1177/0361198121102376510.1177/03611981211023765 ↗
28. Zollinger, D. G., & Barenberg, E. (1989). A mechanistic based design procedure for jointed concrete pavements, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Concrete Pavements. (Vol. 4), 1. Purdue University, Indiana.