Intraoperative Navigation-Based Laxity Measurements and Long-Term Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The available literature provides limited and inadequate data regarding the association between intraoperative knee kinematics, long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to examine the potential relationship between specific intraoperative kinematics laxity assessment, acquired with a computer navigation system, and the long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship in patients undergoing TKA. This study consists of a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive TKA procedures, in which a surgical navigation system was utilized to intra-operatively assess bone resections, implant positioning and gap balancing. The intraoperative kinematic parameters included varus-valgus laxity at 0° (VV 0) and 30° of flexion (VV 30), anterior–posterior displacement at 90° of flexion (AP 90), and passive range of motion (ROM). Different prosthesis designs were used, with a predominance of the posterior stabilized (PS)-type implant. The Knee Injury and Osteo-arthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to investigate patients’ clinical and functional status. Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. A univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with clinical failure. Of 165 eligible patients, 120 were included in the final analysis, with a mean follow-up of 7.7 ± 2.8 years. Revision surgery was required in seven cases, representing surgical failure and an overall survival rate of 94.2%, with survival probabilities of 98.8%, 97.4%, and 93.6% at 6, 8, and 10 years, respectively. Clinical failure (KOOS < 70 in three domains) occurred in 23 patients. No intra-operative surgical parameters, including Hip-Knee-Ankle angle, Preoperative KL grade, prostheses design, VV 0, VV 30, AP 90 and ROM, or demographic variables, were found to be statistically correlated with clinical failure at follow-up. Although, in this navigated TKA cohort, survivorship was acceptable and consistent with previously reported benchmarks, it was not possible to reliably predict survival probability based solely on the intra-operative laxity parameters measured. Nevertheless, the use of surgical navigation can help surgeons accurately assess bone resections and the balance of prosthetic components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences DIBINEM, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Education and Research Department, Isokinetic Medical Group, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, 40132 Bologna, Italy
2nd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Central Institute of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi 110029, India
Orthokey Italia s.r.l., Piazza Giacomo Puccini, 26, 50144 Firenze, Italy
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial10.1097/CORR.0000000000000916 ↗
2. Causes of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review10.1007/s00264-021-05023-3 ↗
3. Are 20% of Patients Actually Dissatisfied Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.011 ↗
4. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021 ↗
5. Selective Laser Melting Molding of Individualized Femur Implant: Design, Process, Optimization10.1007/s42235-021-0007-1 ↗
6. Worden, J.A., Fuqua, A., Ross, B.J., Gillis, J., Heo, K.Y., Wilson, J.M., and Premkumar, A. (2025). Trends in Utilization of Technology-Assisted Navigation in Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty Between 2009 and 2022. J. Arthroplast., in press.10.1016/j.arth.2025.08.082 ↗
7. Computer and robotic—Assisted total knee arthroplasty: A review of outcomes10.1186/s40634-020-00278-y ↗
8. Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1007/s00167-021-06495-x ↗
9. No Benefit of Computer-assisted TKA: 10-year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study10.1007/s11999.0000000000000021 ↗
10. Navigated versus non-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A large single-implant cohort analysis of clinical outcomes and survivorship10.1002/jeo2.70408 ↗
11. High coronal alignment accuracy and satisfactory early outcomes using augmented reality assisted kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty10.1002/jeo2.70476 ↗
12. Relationship between outcome scores and knee laxity following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review10.1080/17453674.2018.1554400 ↗
13. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 201110.1016/j.arth.2013.04.056 ↗
14. Accuracy, Reliability, and Repeatability of Navigation Systems in Clinical Practice10.1053/j.oto.2008.11.001 ↗
15. Inui, H., Taketomi, S., Yamagami, R., Kono, K., Kawaguchi, K., Uehara, K., and Tanaka, S. (2021). Influence of surgical factors on patient satisfaction after bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty: Retrospective examination using multiple regression analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 22.10.1186/s12891-021-04098-8 ↗
16. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses10.1007/s00167-016-4257-0 ↗
17. Different intraoperative kinematics with comparable clinical outcomes of ultracongruent and posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty10.1007/s00167-014-3489-0 ↗
18. Two different posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA designs: Navigator evaluation of intraoperative kinematic differences10.1007/s12306-020-00643-1 ↗
19. Impact of navigation on functional and radiological outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis of one hundred and ninety cases10.1007/s00264-025-06638-6 ↗
20. Evaluation of soft tissue balancing and component alignment in computer-navigated TKA for valgus knee10.1016/j.jor.2025.03.054 ↗
21. Intraoperative evaluation of total knee replacement: Kinematic assessment with a navigation system10.1007/s00167-008-0699-3 ↗
22. No difference in long-term functional outcomes or survivorship after total knee arthroplasty with or without computer navigation: A 17-year survivorship analysis10.1186/s43019-021-00114-2 ↗
23. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010 ↗
24. Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling10.1136/fmch-2019-000262 ↗
25. Twelve-Year Follow-Up of Navigated Computer-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.012 ↗
26. Evaluation of medial-lateral stability and functional outcome following total knee arthroplasty: Results of a single hospital joint registry10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.015 ↗
27. Tibial internal rotation is affected by lateral laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: An intraoperative kinematic study using a navigation system and offset-type tensor10.1007/s00167-013-2627-4 ↗
28. The Influence of Postoperative Knee Stability on Patient Satisfaction in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.017 ↗
29. Assessing coronal laxity in extension and flexion at a minimum of 10 years after primary total knee arthroplasty10.1007/s00167-015-3601-0 ↗
30. Over-constrained kinematic of the medial compartment leads to lower clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty10.1007/s00167-020-06398-3 ↗
31. Assessment of joint laxity following total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of tensioner device, navigation, and robot evaluation10.1016/j.knee.2025.06.020 ↗
32. Perioperative comparison between robotic-assisted and freehand total knee arthroplasty: A quasi-randomized controlled trial
33. The Use of Navigation During Total Knee Replacement Improves Precision in Achieving Mechanical Alignment in Obese Patients: A Short-Term Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
34. Personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty reduces patellar tilt: A retrospective study
35. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up10.1016/j.knee.2011.10.001 ↗
36. High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty10.1007/s11999-013-3229-7 ↗
37. Do Medial Pivot Kinematics Correlate with Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty?10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.019 ↗