Using the surface free energy method to evaluate the effects of liquid antistrip additives on moisture sensitivity in hot mix asphalt
Source abstract
Abstract
The objectives of this research are to evaluate the susceptibility of aggregates and asphalt binder with and without liquid antistrip (LAA) additives to moisture damage based on the properties that affect the adhesion bond between the aggregate and asphalt binder and the cohesion strength of the asphalt binder using the surface free energy (SFE) concept and laboratory testing. The percentage of the aggregate surface area that was exposed to water (P) due to each cycle was used as a screening parameter for evaluating the compatibility of the asphalt binder and aggregates in terms of the resistance to moisture damage. The results show that adding LAA causes the total SFE of the asphalt binder to increase, which results in a decrease in stripping between the aggregate and asphalt binder in the presence of water. Similar results were obtained from a dynamic modulus test. From the data obtained, we conclude that LAA caused a reduction of the magnitude of P that improves its resistance to moisture damage.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Material Properties and Processing · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhasin, A., 2006. Development of methods to quantify bitumen–aggregate adhesion and loss of adhesion to water. Dissertation (PhD). A&M University.
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(634)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(634) ↗
3. Cheng, D., 2002. Surface free energy of asphalt–aggregate system and performance analysis of asphalt concrete. Thesis (PhD). A&M University.
4. 10.1016/S1359-0294(00)00084-410.1016/S1359-0294(00)00084-4 ↗
5. Good, R.J. and van Oss, C.J., 1991. The modern theory of contact angles and the hydrogen bond components of surface energies. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-1176-6_1 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(759)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:6(759) ↗
7. Hefer, A. and Little, D., 2005. Adhesion in bitumen-aggregate system and quantification of the effects of water on the adhesive bond. Report No. ICAR/505-1, Aggregates Foundation for Technology, Research, and Education.
8. Howson, J., et al. 2009. Development of a database for surface energy of aggregates and asphalt binder. Report No. FHWA/TX-5-4524-01-1, Texas Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration.
9. Jones, D.R. and Kennedy, T.W., 1991. The asphalt model. Results of the SHRP Asphalt Research Program.SHRPA-001 Contract, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas.
10. 10.1007/BF0289583610.1007/BF02895836 ↗
11. Maupin, G.W., 1995. Effectiveness of anti-stripping in the field. Virginia Transportation Research Council.
12. Mercado, A.E., 2007. Influence of fundamental material properties and air void structure on moisture damage of asphalt mixes. Thesis (PhD). A&M University.
13. 10.1016/0143-7496(95)00034-810.1016/0143-7496(95)00034-8 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:1(50)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:1(50) ↗
15. Sebaaly, P.E., 2007. Comparison of lime and liquid additives on the moisture damage of hot mix asphalt mixtures. Prepared for the National Lime Association.
16. Shah, B., 2003. Evaluation of moisture damage within asphalt concrete mixes. Thesis (MS). A&M University.
17. Solaimanian, M., Bonaquist, R.E., and Tandon, V., 2007. Improved conditioning and testing procedures for HMA moisture susceptibility. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board Report No. 589.
18. Stuart, K.D., 1990. Moisture damage in asphalt mixture-a state of the art. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration DOT, Report No. FHWA-RD-90-01.
19. Tarrer, A.R. and Wagh, V., 1991. The effect of the physical and chemical characteristics of the aggregate on bonding. Report No. SHRP-A/UIR-91-507, Strategic Highway Research Program.
20. Wasiuddin N.M. · ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2007 · 35 · 3610.1520/JTE100290 ↗
21. Wasiuddin, N.M. and O'Rear, E.A., 2007. Effect of polymeric aggregate treatment using styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) for moisture-induced damage potential. In: Presentation at annual meeting of the international society for asphalt pavements (ISAP). Washington: Technical Committee (on Constitutive Modeling of Asphaltic Materials).
22. Witczak, M.W., Kaloush, K., Pellinen, T., and El-Basyouny, M., 2002. Appendix A – test method for dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete mixtures for permanent deformation. Report 465 Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
23. 10.1002/978047017291910.1002/9780470172919 ↗
24. Zollinger, C., 2005. Application of surface energy measurements to evaluation moisture susceptibility of asphalt and aggregates. Thesis (MS). A&M University.