Bending Solutions of FGM Reddy–Bickford Beams in Terms of Those of the Homogenous Euler–Bernoulli Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, correspondence relations between the solutions of the static bending of functionally graded material (FGM) Reddy–Bickford beams (RBBs) and those of the corresponding homogenous Euler–Bernoulli beams are presented. The effective material properties of the FGM beams are assumed to vary continuously in the thickness direction. Governing equations for the titled problem are formulated via the principle of virtual displacements based on the third-order shear deformation beam theory, in which the higher-order shear force and bending moment are included. General solutions of the displacements and the stress resultants of the FGM RBBs are derived analytically in terms of the deflection of the reference homogenous Euler–Bernoulli beam with the same geometry, loadings and end conditions, which realize a classical and homogenized expression of the bending response of the shear deformable non-homogeneous FGM beams. Particular solutions for the FGM RBBs under specified end constraints and load conditions are given to validate the theory and methodology. The key merit of this work is to be capable of obtaining the high-accuracy solutions of thick FGM beams in terms of the classical beam theory solutions without dealing with the solution of the complicated coupling differential equations with boundary conditions of the problem.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Naebe M, Shirvanimoghaddam K. Functionally graded materials: a review of fabrication and properties. Appl Mater Today. 2016;5:223–45.10.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.001 ↗
2. Jha DK, Kant T, Singh RK. A critical review of recent research on functionally graded plates. Compos Struct. 2013;96:833–49.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.001 ↗
3. Swaminathan K, Naveenkumar DT, Zenkour AM, Carrera E. Stress, vibration and buckling analyses of FGM plates—a state-of-the-art review. Compos Struct. 2015;120:10–31.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.070 ↗
4. Şimşek M, Kocatür T. Free and forced vibration of a functionally graded beam subjected to a concentrated moving harmonic load. Compos Struct. 2009;90:465–73.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.024 ↗
5. Khalili SMR, Jafari AA, Eftekhari SA. A mixed Ritz-DQ method for forced vibration of functionally graded beams carrying moving loads. Compos Struct. 2010;92:2497–511.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.02.012 ↗
6. Alshorbagy AE, Eltaher MA, Mahmoud FF. Free vibration characteristics of a functionally graded beam by finite element. Appl Math Model. 2011;35:412–25.10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.006 ↗
7. Yang J, Chen Y. Free vibration and buckling analysis of functionally graded beams with edge cracks. Compos Struct. 2011;93:48–60.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.033 ↗
8. Li X-F. A unified approach for analyzing static and dynamic behaviors of functionally graded Timoshenko and Euler–Bernoulli beams. J Sound Vib. 2008;318:1210–29.10.1016/j.jsv.2008.04.056 ↗
9. Sina SA, Navazi HM, Haddadpour HMH. An analytical method for free vibration analysis of functionally graded beams. Mater Des. 2009;30:741–7.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.015 ↗
10. Murin J, Aminbaghai M, Hrabovsky J, Kutiš V, Kugler S. Modal analysis of the FGM beams with effect of the shear correction function. Compos Part B. 2013;45:1575–82.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.084 ↗
11. Pradhan KK, Chakarverty S. Free vibration of Euler and Timoshenko functionally graded beams by Rayleigh–Ritz method. Compos Part B. 2013;51:175–84.10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.027 ↗
12. Esfahani SE, Kiani Y, Eslami MR. Non-linear thermal stability analysis of temperature dependent FGM beams supported on non-linear hardening elastic foundations. Int J Mech Sci. 2013;69:10–20.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.007 ↗
13. Ansari R, Gholami R, Shojaei MF, Mohammadi V, Sahmani S. Size-dependent bending, buckling and free vibration of functionally graded Timoshenko microbeams based on the most general strain gradient theory. Compos Struct. 2013;100:385–97.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.048 ↗
14. Levinson M. A new rectangular beam theory. J Sound Vib. 1981;74:81–7.10.1016/0022-460X(81)90493-4 ↗
15. Bickford WB. A consistent higher-order beam theory. Dev Theor Appl Mech. 1982;11:137–50.
16. Reddy JN. A simple higher-order theory for laminated composite plates. J Appl Mech. 1984;51:745–52.10.1115/1.3167719 ↗
17. Touratier M. An efficient standard plate theory. Int J Eng Sci. 1991;1991(29):901–16.10.1016/0020-7225(91)90165-Y ↗
18. Soldatos KP. A transverse shear deformation theory for homogeneous monoclinic plates. Acta Mech. 1992;94:195–220.10.1007/BF01176650 ↗
19. Karama M, Afaq KS, Mistou S. Mechanical behaviour of laminated composite beam by the new multi-layered laminated composite structures model with transverse shear stress continuity. Int J Solids Struct. 2003;40:1525–46.10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00647-9 ↗
20. Aydogdu M. A new shear deformation theory for laminated composite plates. Compos Struct. 2009;89:94–101.10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.07.008 ↗
21. Kadoli R, Akhtar K, Ganesan N. Static analysis of functionally graded beams using higher order shear deformation theory. Appl Math Model. 2008;32:2509–23.10.1016/j.apm.2007.09.015 ↗
22. Benatta MA, Tounsi A, Mechab I, Bouiadjra MB. Mathematical solution for bending of short hybrid composite beams with variable fibers spacing. Appl Math Comput. 2009;212:337–48.
23. Sallai BO, Tounsi A, Mechab I, Bachir MB, Meradjah MB, Adda EA. A theoretical analysis of flexional bending of AI/AI2O3 S-FGM thick beams. Comput Mater Sci. 2009;44:1344–50.10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.001 ↗
24. Kapuria S, Bhattacharyya M, Kumar AN. Bending and free vibration response of layered functionally graded beams: a theoretical model and its experiment validation. Compos Struct. 2008;88:390–402.10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.019 ↗
25. Thai H-T, Vo TP. Bending and free vibration of functionally graded beams using various higher-order shear deformation beam theories. Int J Mech Sci. 2012;62:57–66.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.05.014 ↗
26. Vo T-P, Thai HT, Nguyen T-K, Inam F. Static and vibration analysis of functionally graded beams using refined shear deformation theory. Meccnica. 2014;49:155–68.10.1007/s11012-013-9780-1 ↗
27. Vo T-P, Thai HT, Nguyen T-K, Inam F, Lee J. Static behavior of functionally graded sandwich beams using a quasi-3D theory. Compos Part B Eng. 2015;68:59–74.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.030 ↗
28. Filippi M, Carrera E, Zenkour AM. Static analysis of FGM beams by various theories and finite elements. Compos Part B Eng. 2015;72:1–9.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.004 ↗
29. Aydogdu M, Tashkin V. Free vibration analysis of functionally graded beams with simply supported edges. Mater Des. 2007;28:1651–6.10.1016/j.matdes.2006.02.007 ↗
30. Şimşek M. Fundamental frequency analysis of functionally graded beams by using different higher-order beam theories. Nucl Eng Des. 2010;240:697–705.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.013 ↗
31. Pradhan KK, Chakraverty S. Effects of different shear deformation theories on free vibration of functionally graded beams. Int J Mech Sci. 2014;82:149–60.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.03.014 ↗
32. Mahi A, Bedia EAA, Tounsi A, Mechab I. An analytical method for temperature-dependent free vibration analysis of functionally graded beams. Compos Struct. 2010;92:1877–87.10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.01.010 ↗
33. Shen H-S, Lin F, Xiang Y. Nonlinear bending and thermal postbuckling of functionally graded graphene-reinforced composite laminated beams resting on elastic foundations. Eng Struct. 2017;140:89–97.10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.069 ↗
34. Sankar BV. An elasticity solution for functionally graded beams. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61:689–96.10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00007-0 ↗
35. Zhong Z, Yu T. Analytical solution of cantilever functionally graded beam. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67:481–8.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.023 ↗
36. Ding H-J, Huang D-J, Chen W-Q. Elastic solution for plane anisotropic functionally graded beams. Int J Solids Struct. 2007;44:176–96.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.04.026 ↗
37. Wang CM. Timoshenko beam-bending solutions in terms of Euler–Bernoulli solutions. J Eng Mech ASCE. 1995;121:763–5.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:6(763) ↗
38. Reddy JN, Wang CM, Lim GT, Ng KH. Bending solutions of Levinson beams and plates in terms of the classical theory. Int J Solids Struct. 2001;38:4701–20.10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00298-5 ↗
39. Reddy JN, Wang CM, Lee KH. Relationships between bending solutions of classical and shear deformation beam theories. Int J Solids Struct. 1997;26:3373–84.10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00211-9 ↗
40. Reddy JN, Wang CM, Lee KH. Shear deformable beams and plates-relationship with classical solutions. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000.
41. Li S-R, Cao D-F, Wan Z-Q. Bending solutions of FGM Timoshenko beams from those of the homogenous Euler–Bernoulli beams. Appl Math Model. 2013;37:7077–85.10.1016/j.apm.2013.02.047 ↗
42. Li S-R, Batra RC. Relations between buckling loads of functionally graded Timoshenko and homogeneous Euler–Bernoulli beams. Compos Struct. 2013;95:5–9.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.027 ↗
43. Li S-R, Wang X, Wan Z-Q. Classical and homogenized expressions for buckling solutions of functionally graded material Levinson beams. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2015;28:592–604.10.1016/S0894-9166(15)30052-5 ↗
44. Li S-R, Wan Z-Q, Wang X. Homogenized and classical expressions for static bending solutions for FGM Levinson Beams. Appl Math Mech. 2015;36:895–910.10.1007/s10483-015-1956-9 ↗
45. Groh RMJ, Weaver PM. Static inconsistencies in certain axiomatic higher-order shear deformation theories for beams plates and shells. Compos Struct. 2015;120:231–45.10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.006 ↗