Numerical Simulation of Water Table Dynamics Under Tidal Influence for Construction Planning in a Coastal Urban Area of Mazatlán, México
Source abstract
Abstract
Coastal construction projects often require excavation below the water table, where tidal variability and urban infrastructure generate complex groundwater conditions. This study presents a numerical simulation of water table dynamics in a coastal urban area of Mazatlán, México, influenced by tidal forcing, a lake, and an impermeable seawall. Six critical scenarios were modeled using MODFLOW 6 and ModelMuse interface, covering the period from November 2023 to April 2024. The scenarios correspond to astronomical tide events during the new moon phase, when maximum and minimum tide levels occurred within 24 h. These conditions are related to the highest piezometric levels observed in field. Model calibration was based on 18 field observations collected at 09:00, 12:00, and 15:00 across the selected dates. Model outputs closely matched the field observations, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.056 m, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.049 m. Although the differences are minimal, they reflect short-term variability and limited fluctuation during calibration. However, the full monitoring period showed groundwater levels ranging from −0.10 to 0.53 m above mean sea level (masl), emphasizing the importance of understanding short-term dynamics. This modeling approach supports construction planning, helping to anticipate risks and promote better and informed construction practices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán 80013, Sinaloa, Mexico
Groundwater Hydrology Division, Mexican Institute of Water Technology, Jiutepec 62550, Morelos, Mexico
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Tidal effects on groundwater dynamics in unconfined aquifers10.1002/hyp.183 ↗
2. A study on the influence of tides on the water table conditions of the shallow coastal aquifers10.1007/s13201-018-0654-5 ↗
3. Identifying The Effect of Tides on Groundwater Level Fluctuations on Gili Ketapang Island, Indonesia10.3846/jeelm.2021.14618 ↗
4. Dynamic response of groundwater to rainfall events and sea tides in coral island10.1002/hyp.15254 ↗
5. The role of groundwater connectivity in sustaining European lake water systems10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180038 ↗
6. Toran, L. (2019). Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction. Encyclopedia of Water, Wiley.10.1002/9781119300762.wsts0027 ↗
7. Fienen, M.N., Haserodt, M.J., Leaf, A.T., and Westenbroek, S.M. (2022). Simulation of Regional Groundwater Flow and Groundwater/Lake Interactions in the Central Sands, Wisconsin.10.3133/sir20225046 ↗
8. Barrier effect of underground structures on aquifers10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.004 ↗
9. Behaviours of groundwater and strata during dewatering of large-scale excavations with a nearby underground barrier10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129400 ↗
10. Potential Groundwater Impacts from Civil-Engineering Works10.1111/j.1747-6593.2003.tb00433.x ↗
11. The changing nature of groundwater control for temporary works
12. Groundwater-related aspects during the development of deep excavations below the water table: A short review10.1016/j.undsp.2019.10.002 ↗
13. Cashman, P.M., and Preene, M. (2020). Groundwater Problems for Excavations in Soils. Groundwater Lowering in Construction, CRC Press. [3rd ed.].10.1201/9781003050025 ↗
14. Chapter 3 Problems caused by groundwater
15. Taylor, C.J., and Alley, W.M. (2025, November 19). Ground-Water-Level Monitoring and the Importance of Long-Term Water-Level Data, Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1217/pdf/circular1217.pdf.
16. Global Groundwater Modeling and Monitoring: Opportunities and Challenges10.1029/2020WR029500 ↗
17. Chapter 9 Managing groundwater in practice
18. de Mazatlán, H.A. (2026, January 04). Reglamento de Construcción de Mazatlán. Available online: https://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Estatal/SINALOA/Municipios/Mazatlan/MAZREG02.pdf.
19. Somerville, S.H. (1986). Control of Groundwater for Temporary Works, Construction Industry Research and Information Association.
20. Pump-and-treat optimization using well locations and pumping rates as decision variables10.1029/97WR00366 ↗
21. Winter, M.G., Smith, D.M., Eldred, P.J.L., and Toll, D.G. (2015). Optimisation of dewatering systems. Proceedings of the XVI ECSMGE Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development, ICE Publishing Limited.10.1680/ecsmge.60678 ↗
22. Settlements around pumping wells: Analysis of influential factors and a simple calculation procedure10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.040 ↗
23. Effect of uncontrolled dewatering on adjacent building10.1063/5.0106172 ↗
24. Simulation of groundwater level in a coastal aquifer10.1080/1064119X.2019.1639226 ↗
25. Seasonal water table dynamics and effects of a rising sea-level in the low-lying sandy coast of Cassino Beach, southern Brazil
26. Lee, W.-D., Yoo, Y.-J., Jeong, Y.-M., and Hur, D.-S. (2019). Experimental and Numerical Analysis on Hydraulic Characteristics of Coastal Aquifers with Seawall. Water, 11.10.3390/w11112343 ↗
27. A review of regional groundwater flow modeling10.1016/j.gsf.2011.03.003 ↗
28. Anderson, M.P., Woessner, W.W., and Hunt, R.J. (2015). Applied Groundwater Modeling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport, Academic Press.
29. Ground Water Flow Modelling Using MODFLOW—A Review10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.011 ↗
30. Thomas, S.D., French, G., Watson, J., and Casal, B. (2024). Design and modelling for groundwater engineering and control. Geotechnical Engineering Challenges to Meet Current and Emerging Needs of Society, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003431749-520 ↗
31. MODFLOW as a Configurable Multi-Model Hydrologic Simulator10.1111/gwat.13351 ↗
32. Hydrogeological Modeling of Aquifer Systems for Sustainable Groundwater Management
33. A tool for efficient, model-independent management optimization under uncertainty10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.019 ↗
34. Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction at the Regional-scale—A Review with Focus on Regional Integrated Models10.1007/s11269-015-1163-z ↗
35. Srzić, V., Lovrinović, I., Racetin, I., and Pletikosić, F. (2020). Hydrogeological Characterization of Coastal Aquifer on the Basis of Observed Sea Level and Groundwater Level Fluctuations: Neretva Valley Aquifer, Croatia. Water, 12.10.3390/w12020348 ↗
36. Groundwater Flow Assessment Using Modflow 6 and Model Muse: Application to Pointe-Noire Coastal Aquifers, Congo-Brazzaville10.4236/jwarp.2021.1311048 ↗
37. Impacts of regional climate model projected rainfall, sea level rise, and urbanization on a coastal aquifer10.1007/s11356-021-18213-8 ↗
38. Mathiasen, R.F., Haugan, E.P., Andersen, T.R., Hansen, H.H., Medhus, A.B., and Poulsen, S.E. (2023). Short-Term Ocean Rise Effects on Shallow Groundwater in Coastal Areas: A Case Study in Juelsminde, Denmark. Water, 15.10.3390/w15132425 ↗
39. Determining the portion of dewatering-induced settlement in excavation pit projects10.1080/19386362.2018.1467858 ↗
40. Chapter 8 Groundwater control
41. Optimal design and dynamic control of construction dewatering with the consideration of dewatering process10.1007/s12205-016-0552-z ↗
42. Sikdar, P.K. (2019). Numerical Groundwater Modelling. Groundwater Development and Management, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-75115-3_7 ↗
43. (2025, July 14). Reglamento de Construcciones del Distrito Federal. Norma Técnica Complementaria para Diseño y Construcción de Cimentaciones. Ciudad de Mexico. Available online: https://www.uteycv.esiaz.ipn.mx/comunidad/estructuras/comunicados/NTC%2006.nov.202_cimentaciones.pdf.
44. Langevin, C.D., Hughes, J.D., Banta, E.R., Niswonger, R.G., Panday, S., and Provost, A.M. (2017). Documentation for the MODFLOW 6 Groundwater Flow Model.10.3133/tm6A55 ↗
45. Winston, R.B. (2019). ModelMuse Version 4: A Graphical User Interface for MODFLOW 6.10.3133/sir20195036 ↗
46. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2026, March 31). Modelo Digital de Elevación Tipo Terreno con 5m de Resolución Derivado de Datos de Sensores Remotos Satelitales y Aerotransportados. F13A45C1, Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=889463089599.
47. Comisión Nacional del Agua (2026, February 28). Manual de Monitoreo Piezométrico de Acuíferos. México City, Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/779903/ManualDeMonitoreoPiezometricoDeAcuiferos2008_c.pdf.
48. SMN (2026, March 05). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geofísica, Servicio Mareográfico Nacional, México, Available online: https://www.mareografico.unam.mx.
49. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2026, March 05). Guía Metodológica de la Red Geodésica Vertical, Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/nueva_estruc/702825095390.pdf.
50. Cueto Díaz, J.d.D., and Heras, J.Z. (2022). Estudio de Mecánica de Suelos para un Edificio de 19 Niveles y dos Sótanos, Ubicado Sobre av. del Mar Esq. Calle isla de Chivos, en Mazatlán, Sinaloa. Culiacán, Sinaloa.
51. Subdirección General Técnica Gerencia de Aguas Subterráneas (2024). Actualización de la Disponibilidad Media Anual de Agua en el Acuífero río Presidio (2509), Estado de Sinaloa.
52. Estimation of Aquifer Parameters in Erho, Nigeria Using the Cooper-Jacob Evaluation Method10.3844/ajessp.2014.500.508 ↗
53. Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity, Transmissibility and Specific Yield of Aquifer in Barind Area, Bangladesh Using Pumping Test
54. Servicio Meteorológico Nacional and Comisión Nacional del Agua (2025, July 04). Información Estadística Climatológica—Información de Estaciones Climatológicas, Available online: https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/informacion-climatologica/informacion-estadistica-climatologica.
55. MeteoStat (2025, July 04). Información de Estación 76459 Mazatlán—El Confital. Available online: https://meteostat.net/es/station/76459?t=2023-10-01/2024-05-31.
56. Mijares, F.J.A. (2015). Fundamentos de Hidrología de Superficie, Limusa.
57. del Distrito Federal, G. (2004). Normas Técnicas Complementarias para Diseño y Construcción de Cimentaciones, Academia de la Investigación Científica, A.C.
58. Chapter 5 Conceptual models
59. Thorsen, S. (2026, January 06). Moon Phases for Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico in 2023. Available online: https://www.timeanddate.com/moon/phases/mexico/mazatlan?year=2023.
60. Thorsen, S. (2026, January 06). Moon Phases for Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico in 2024. Available online: https://www.timeanddate.com/moon/phases/mexico/mazatlan?year=2024.
61. Hill, M.C., and Tiedeman, C.R. (2007). Effective Groundwater Model Calibration, Wiley.
62. Ten strategies towards successful calibration of environmental models10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129414 ↗
63. The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104954 ↗
64. One-at-a-Time Parameter Perturbation Ensemble of the Community Land Model, Version 5.110.1029/2024MS004715 ↗
65. The John Mitchell Lecture 2022: Thinking conceptually about groundwater problems10.1144/qjegh2024-143 ↗
66. An overview of approaches for reducing uncertainties in hydrological forecasting: Progress and challenges10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104956 ↗
67. Beltrán-Vargas, D., García-Páez, F., Martínez-Morales, M., and Rentería-Guevara, S.A. (2024, January 11). Numerical Models for Groundwater Flows: Key in Construction. Proceedings of the 8th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences Session Numerical and Experimental Methods, Data Analyses, Digital Twin, IoT Machine Learning and AI in Water Sciences, Basel, Switzerland. Available online: https://sciforum.net/paper/view/18864.
68. Advantages and Limitations of the Observational Method in Applied Soil Mechanics10.1680/geot.1969.19.2.171 ↗
69. Nicholson, D., Tse, C.-M., and Penny, C. (1999). The Observational Method in Ground Engineering: Principles and Applications, CIRIA.
70. Beltrán-Vargas, D., García-Páez, F., and Martínez-Morales, M. (2025, January 9–11). Numerical Simulation of Water Table Dynamics for Construction Planning in a Coastal Urban Area of Mazatlán, Mexico. Proceedings of the 6th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, Online. Available online: https://sciforum.net/paper/view/27815.