journal article·2026-05-08Open access

Data-Driven Multi-Objective Crashworthiness Optimization of NEV Sill Beam Under Side-Pole Impact

Kewei Li, Peijie Xiao, Hao Li, Jianbing Wu, Jianyu Li, Zhuoran Zeng, Shiwei Xu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 10

Abstract

Protecting the power battery pack during side-pole impact poses a critical challenge for new energy vehicle (NEV) passive safety, where traditional methods struggle to balance computational efficiency and predictive accuracy due to strong nonlinearity. This study proposes a multi-stage optimization framework integrating the equivalent static load (ESL) method for nonlinear topology optimization and machine learning-based surrogate modeling. A multi-cell sill beam configuration is first developed via ESL-based topology optimization with deformation mode correction to address localized buckling. Subsequently, independent XGBoost models for intrusion, energy absorption, and mass are constructed, with their hyperparameters efficiently tuned using the Optuna framework with the Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE). Results demonstrate that the optimized XGBoost model achieves superior prediction accuracy (R2 > 0.96) compared to conventional models (SVR, RSM, GPR, and RBF), with RMSE approximately 40% lower than the second-best model (GPR). The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III) is then employed for tri-objective optimization, and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) selects an optimal design, which is validated by finite element simulation with high agreement (maximum prediction error < 3%). Compared to the baseline design, the optimized sill beam achieves an 11.44% reduction in maximum intrusion, a 9.86% increase in energy absorption, and a 13.45% reduction in structural mass, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed data-driven crashworthiness optimization framework.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Cellular and Composite Structures · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology for Vehicle, College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Suzhou Research Institute, Hunan University, Suzhou 215131, China

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China · the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province · the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Kompass, K., Königs, S., Euhus, F., Fuchs, F., Zimmermann, S., Schöneburg, R., Justen, R., Martin, S., and Mensa, G. (2023). Safety of Electro Mobility-White Paper of the Fisita Intelligent Safety Working Group. Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
2. Multi-Objective Optimization Design of a Battery Pack System for Crashworthiness and Lightweight Based on a Submodel and Hybrid Weighting Method10.1080/0305215X.2024.2417199 ↗
3. Finite Element Analysis Considering Packaging Efficiency of Innovative Battery Pack Designs10.1080/13588265.2019.1632545 ↗
4. Yang, R., Zhang, W., Li, S., Xu, M., Huang, W., and Qin, Z. (2023). Finite Element Analysis and Optimization of Hydrogen Fuel Cell City Bus Body Frame Structure. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131910964 ↗
5. Yang, R., Li, S., Cheng, T., Zou, P., and Tian, L. (2025). Enhanced Side Pole Impact Protection: Crashworthiness Optimization for Electric Micro Commercial Vehicles. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15042220 ↗
6. Chen, J., Bian, K., and Mao, H. (2025). Analyzing EV Battery Package Responses during Side Pole Impacts with Multiple Speeds and Locations, SAE International. SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2025-01-8730 ↗
7. Miller, B., and Ziemiański, L. (2023). Multi-Objective Optimization of Thin-Walled Composite Axisymmetric Structures Using Neural Surrogate Models and Genetic Algorithms. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16206794 ↗
8. RSM and ANN Modeling of the Energy Absorption Behavior of Steel Thin-Walled Columns: A Multi-Objective Optimization Using the Genetic Algorithm10.1007/s40430-020-02643-5 ↗
9. Multi-Objective Optimization of Lightweight and Crashworthiness of Automotive Front-End Structures Based on Stacked Regression Surrogate10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111138 ↗
10. Structural Topology Optimization for Crash Intrusion Control under Contact10.1007/s00158-025-04086-9 ↗
11. Multi-Model Optimization for Various Disciplines Using the Equivalent Static Loads Method10.1007/s00158-023-03513-z ↗
12. An Improved Numerically-Stable Equivalent Static Loads (ESLs) Algorithm Based on Energy-Scaling Ratio for Stiffness Topology Optimization under Crash Loads10.1007/s00158-018-2054-8 ↗
13. Nonlinear Dynamic Structural Optimization of Electric Vehicles Considering Multiple Safety Tests10.1007/s12239-023-0048-z ↗
14. Multi-Objective Topology Optimization Method for Multi-Axis Random Vibration Based on Hybrid Cellular Automata10.1016/j.apm.2024.05.035 ↗
15. Crash Topology Optimization for Front-End Safety Parts of Battery Electric Vehicle Using an Improved Equivalent Static Loads Method10.1177/09544070231162137 ↗
16. A Novel Impact-Resistant Optimization Framework Based on a Non-Uniform Grid-Stiffened Strategy and the Equivalent Static Loads Method10.1080/0305215X.2025.2467794 ↗
17. Topology Optimization Using Difference-Based Equivalent Static Loads10.1007/s00158-022-03309-7 ↗
18. Villa, D., Furcas, F., Pralits, J.O., Vernengo, G., and Gaggero, S. (2021). An Effective Mesh Deformation Approach for Hull Shape Design by Optimization. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9101107 ↗
19. Surrogate Modeling of Advanced Computer Simulations Using Deep Gaussian Processes10.1016/j.ress.2019.106731 ↗
20. Multi-Fidelity Co-Kriging Surrogate Model for Ship Hull Form Optimization10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110239 ↗
21. Why Do Tree-Based Models Still Outperform Deep Learning on Typical Tabular Data?
22. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. KDD’16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
23. Prediction of Extent of Damage in Vehicle during Crash Using Improved XGBoost Model10.1080/13588265.2022.2075101 ↗
24. Meaney, C., Wang, X., Guan, J., and Stukel, T.A. (2025). Comparison of Methods for Tuning Machine Learning Model Hyper-Parameters: With Application to Predicting High-Need High-Cost Health Care Users. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 25.10.1186/s12874-025-02561-x ↗
25. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M. (2019). Optuna: A next-Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. KDD’19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
26. hyOPTXg: OPTUNA Hyper-Parameter Optimization Framework for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Using XGBoost10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103456 ↗
27. Comparative Review of Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for Design and Safety Optimization in Electric Vehicles10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3475032 ↗
28. An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems with Box Constraints10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535 ↗
29. An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281534 ↗
30. Dorronsoro, B., Talbi, E.-G., Weraikat, D., and Bouamama, S. (2026). An Improved NSGA-III Algorithm for Solving High-Dimensional Many-Objective Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem. Proceedings of the Optimization and Learning, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-032-13589-6 ↗
31. EF1-NSGA-III: An Evolutionary Algorithm Based on the First Front to Obtain Non-Negative and Non-Repeated Extreme Points10.15446/inginvestig.v40n3.82906 ↗
32. Jiang, R., Ci, S., Liu, D., Cheng, X., and Pan, Z. (2021). A Hybrid Multi-Objective Optimization Method Based on NSGA-II Algorithm and Entropy Weighted TOPSIS for Lightweight Design of Dump Truck Carriage. Machines, 9.10.3390/machines9080156 ↗
33. Qiu, W., Liu, K., Liu, H., Zong, S., Wang, J., and Gao, Z. (2023). Crashworthiness Optimization Method of Ship Structure under Multi-Working Conditions. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11071335 ↗
34. Hao, G., Wang, B., Xing, J., Xu, P., Yao, S., Gu, X., and Shu, A. (2026). Physics–Data-Driven Crashworthiness Design of Slotted Circular Tubes for Airdrop Cushioning Energy Absorption in Transport Vehicles. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16084005 ↗
35. Fatiha, I.C., Santosa, S.P., Widagdo, D., and Pratomo, A.N. (2024). Design Optimisation of Metastructure Configuration for Lithium-Ion Battery Protection Using Machine Learning Methodology. Batteries, 10.10.3390/batteries10020052 ↗
36. Multi-Objective Optimization of Aluminum Alloy Electric Bus Frame Connectors for Enhanced Durability
37. Fang, H., Jaus, C., Wang, Q., Palta, E., Pachocki, L., and Bruski, D. (2024). Numerical Modeling and Simulation of Vehicular Crashes into Three-Bar Metal Bridge Rail. Computation, 12.10.20944/preprints202407.1489.v1 ↗