Mutagenicity Screening of Selected Water-Based Dispersions and Materials Utilized in Cardboard and Wood Coatings Using the Standard and 384-Well Ames Tests
Source abstract
Abstract
Novel biobased materials and processing techniques are actively developed for sustainable coatings. This study investigated the potential mutagenicity of novel materials and derived dispersions used for biobased paper and wood coatings using a pilot 384-well test. The standard Ames test was performed for selected materials to compare and validate the results with the non-standard 384-well test. Salmonella Typhimurium strains (TA100 and TA98) were used for testing. Experimental dispersions were prepared using suberin and betulin extracted from outer birch bark. The test set of seven samples (n = 7) included commercial reference samples and additives. Both test methods were suitable for these samples but also highlighted method-specific differences and challenges. For suberin-derived materials and betulin at 0.5–1% concentration, neither of the tests indicated mutagenicity. In the case of some industrial samples, the 384-well test and the standard Ames test gave clearly contradictory results. These can be explained by the test limitations, such as the sample color or compositional instability of dispersions. To summarize, this study indicated the need to test the novel coating materials with multiple concentrations, and several bacterial strains carrying different types of genetic mutations, as well as to use complementary genotoxicity tests for a more accurate toxicity profile.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland
Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Viikinkaari 9, P.O. Box 2, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
Funding
Business Finland
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Bio-based materials for barrier coatings on paper packaging10.1007/s13399-022-03241-2 ↗
2. Progress in waterborne polymer dispersions for coating applications: Commercialized systems and new trends10.1039/D4SU00267A ↗
3. Sustainable biodegradable coatings for food packaging: Challenges and opportunities10.1039/D3GC02647G ↗
4. Migration of toxic elements from recycled paper food contact materials to food simulants: Compatibility and influence of sample preparation methods10.1093/fqsafe/fyaf002 ↗
5. Fully bio-based water-resistant wood coatings derived from tree bark10.1039/D4MH01010H ↗
6. In vitro safety and ecotoxicity tests of suberin- and lignin-based nanoparticles10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.122226 ↗
7. Catalán, J., and Norppa, H. (2017). Safety aspects of bio-based nanomaterials. Bioengineering, 4.10.3390/bioengineering4040094 ↗
8. Betulinic acid modulates urethane-induced genotoxicity and mutagenicity in mice and Drosophila melanogaster10.1016/j.fct.2020.111228 ↗
9. Chemical safety and risk assessment of bio-based and/or biodegradable polymers for food contact: A review10.1016/j.foodres.2025.115737 ↗
10. Are bioplastics and plant-based materials safer than conventional plastics? In vitro toxicity and chemical composition10.1016/j.envint.2020.106066 ↗
11. Chemical and biological assessments of environmental mixtures: A review of current trends, advances, and future perspectives10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128658 ↗
12. Leminen, V., Kainusalmi, M., Tanninen, P., Lindell, H., Varis, J., Ovaska, S.-S., Backfolk, K., Pitkänen, M., Sipiläinen-Malm, T., and Hartman, J. (2013, January 10–13). Aspects on Packaging Safety and Biomaterials. Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Packaging, Espoo, Finland.
13. Xia, L., Gui, T., Wang, J., Tian, H., Wang, Y., Ning, L., and Wu, L. (2025). Bio-Based Coatings: Progress, Challenges and Future Perspectives. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17243266 ↗
14. Element Transfer Reaction theory: Scientific connotation and its applications in chemical industry10.1016/j.cclet.2025.110924 ↗
15. Mixture toxicity revisited: A translational review of experimental evidence from animal models to human health risk assessment10.1016/j.tox.2025.154372 ↗
16. From the forest to the plate—Hemicelluloses, galactoglucomannan, glucuronoxylan, and phenolic-rich extracts from unconventional sources as functional food ingredients10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132284 ↗
17. OECD (2020). Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing. Test No. 471.10.1787/9789264071247-en ↗
18. Assessment of the performance of the Ames MPFTM assay: A multicenter collaborative study with six coded chemicals10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503718 ↗
19. Investigation of chemicals with inconsistent Ames results using miniaturized Ames test systems10.1016/j.mrgentox.2025.503874 ↗
20. OECD (2022). Detailed Review Paper on the Miniaturized Version of the Bacterial Reverse Gene Mutation Test, OECD Publishing. No. 358.
21. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: Vehicle and positive control results from the standard Ames assay, the 6- and 24-well miniaturized plate incorporation assays and the Ames IITM assay10.1002/em.22014 ↗
22. Assessment of the miniaturized liquid Ames microplate format (MPFTM) for a selection of the test items from the recommended list of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals10.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.503218 ↗
23. Rainer, B., Pinter, E., Prielinger, L., Coppola, C., Marin-Kuan, M., Schilter, B., Apprich, S., and Tacker, M. (2021). Direct comparison of the lowest effect concentrations of mutagenic reference substances in two Ames test formats. Toxics, 9.10.3390/toxics9070152 ↗
24. The effect of organic solvents on selected microorganisms and model liposome membrane10.1007/s11033-019-04782-y ↗
25. Suberin-based aqueous dispersions for barrier packaging applications10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c02244 ↗
26. (2012). Water quality—Determination of the Genotoxicity of Water and Waste Water—Salmonella/Microsome Fluctuation Test (Ames Fluctuation Test) (Standard No. ISO 11350:2012).
27. Error propagation in calculated ratios10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.12.014 ↗
28. Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity10.1093/mutage/gep017 ↗
29. Ecotoxicological evaluation of fruit extracts from yerba mate progenies (Ilex paraguariensis a St-Hil.): A natural biopesticide10.1080/03601234.2021.1949927 ↗
30. Determination of a positive response in the Ames Salmonella mutagenicity assay10.1002/em.22538 ↗
31. The Ames test: The two-fold rule revisited10.1016/S0165-1218(96)90044-0 ↗
32. Recommended criteria for the evaluation of bacterial mutagenicity data (Ames test)10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.07.004 ↗
33. Genotoxicity of three micro/nanocelluloses with different physicochemical characteristics in MG-63 and V79 cells10.3390/jox12020009 ↗
34. Characteristics and safety of nano-sized cellulose fibrils10.1007/s10570-014-0397-x ↗
35. Evaluation of betulin mutagenicity by Salmonella/microsome test10.15171/apb.2016.057 ↗
36. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of betulin-3-yl 2-amino-2-deoxy-β-d-glycopyranosides10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103568 ↗
37. Małaczewska, J., Kaczorek-Łukowska, E., and Kazuń, B. (2021). High cytotoxicity of betulin towards fish and murine fibroblasts: Is betulin safe for nonneoplastic cells?. BMC Vet. Res., 17.10.1186/s12917-021-02905-x ↗
38. Jokinen, N. (2025). The Production, Purification, and Analysis of Thermochemically Produced Distillates, Production of Distillates from Biomasses, the Purification of Phenols from Them, and a Novel Protocol for Water Content Determination. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Eastern Finland].
39. Toxicity, Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of phenols and phenolic compounds on human and living organisms [A Review]
40. OECD (2017). Overview of the Set of OECD Genetic Toxicology Test Guidelines and Updates Performed in 2014–2015-Second Edition, OECD Publishing. No. 238.
41. Hydrophobic polymeric particles of the plant polyester suberin destroy bacteria by interacting with their membranes10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102736 ↗