Calibration of a 3D-FE Model with Non-Contact Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) Measurements of Pavement Deflection Velocity Under Accelerated Pavement Testing
Source abstract
Abstract
This research utilizes Laser Doppler Vibrometer (LDV) technology to measure pavement deflection velocity under heavy moving loads at the Virginia DOT Accelerated Pavement Testing (VDOT APT) facility. While LDVs are typically integrated into Traffic Speed Deflectometers (TSDs) for measuring deflection velocities, this research employs a standalone, tripod-mounted LDV to capture highly repeatable data under controlled Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS) loading. A three-dimensional viscoelastic finite element (3D-FE) model was developed in Abaqus (version 2016) and calibrated using the LDV-measured deflection velocities and site-specific material properties. The model incorporates asphalt viscoelasticity, three-dimensional nonlinear contact stresses, and continuous loading conditions. Results demonstrate very good agreement between the calibrated 3D-FE model and observed responses, with calculated percentage differences of 0.6% and 3.4% for the maximum and minimum deflection velocity peaks, respectively. These findings, along with a 10% ratio between the standard deviation of the error and the measured signal, validate the model’s accuracy and the effectiveness of LDV instrumentation. This stand-alone application of a TSD-type LDV at an APT facility, to directly measure pavement deflection velocity under a moving load to calibrate a 3D-FE model, represents a key innovative aspect and addresses an identified gap in the literature on LDV-based pavement evaluation techniques. It should be noted that the proposed framework is calibrated for a single pavement structure under controlled loading and environmental conditions, and is applicable to the initial, undamaged state of the pavement. Further validation across different material configurations, environmental gradients, and damage stages is required to generalize the approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Sustainability and Resilience Infrastructure at VTTI, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 3500 Transportation Research Plaza, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Virginia Transportation Research Council, Virginia Department of Transportation, 530 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. The Available Approaches for Using Traffic Speed Deflectometer Data at Network Level Pavement Management System10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111901 ↗
2. Scavone, M. (2022). Use of the Traffic Speed Deflectometer for Concrete and Composite Pavement Structural Health Assessment. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University].
3. Rada, G., Nazarian, S., Visintine, B., Siddharthan, R., and Thyagarajan, S. (2016). Pavement Structural Evaluation at the Network Level: Final Report, Report Number: FHWA-HRT-15-074.
4. Pilot Study to Incorporate Network-Level Structural Condition in Agency Pavement Management Practices10.1177/03611981241252152 ↗
5. Hildebrand, G., and Rasmussen, S. (2002). Development of a High Speed Deflectograph; Report 117; Road Directorate, Danish Road Institute, Ministry of Transport—Denmark.
6. Simonin, J.M., Lièvre, D., Rasmussen, S., and Hildebrand, G. (2005, January 25–27). Assessment of the Danish High Speed Deflectograph In France. Proceedings of the 7th International Conferences on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields, Trondheim, Norway.
7. Krarup, J., Rasmussen, S., Aagaard, L., and Hjort, P.G. (November, January 29). Output from The Greenwood Traffic Speed Deflectometer. Proceedings of the 22nd ARRB Conference—Research into Practice, Canberra, Australia.
8. Tutumluer, E., and Al-Qadi, I. (2009). Development of the UK Highways Agency Traffic Speed Deflectometer. Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Champaign, IL, USA, 29 June–2 July 2009, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9780203865286 ↗
9. Flintsch, G., Katicha, S., Bryce, J., Ferne, B., and S. Diefenderfer, B. (2013). Assessment of Continuous Pavement Deflection Measuring Technologies, Transportation Research Board. SHRP 2 Report S2-R06F-RW-1.10.17226/22766 ↗
10. Urbaez, E., Flintsch, G., Katicha, S., Diefenderfer, B., and Trani, A. (2025). Methodology to Verify Traffic Speed Deflectometers (TSDs) Deflection Velocity Measurements Using Laser Doppler Vibrometers (LDVs) Sensors. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University].
11. A Time-Domain Finite Element Method for Dynamic Visco-Elastic Solution of Latered-Half-Space Responses Under Loading Pulses10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.07.005 ↗
12. Zaghloul, S.M., and White, T.D. (1993). Use of a Three-Dimensional Dynamic Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavement, Transportation Research Records. No. 1388: 60–9.
13. Al-Qadi, I., and Wang, H. (2011, January 27–30). Prediction of Tire Pavement Contact Stresses and Analysis of 5 Asphalt Pavement Responses: A Decoupled Approach. Proceedings of the Asphalt Paving Technology—Proceedings Association of Asphalt Technologists, Tampa, FL, USA.
14. Hernandez, J. (2010). Evaluation of the Response of Perpetual Pavement at Accelerated Pavement Loading Facility: Finite Element analysis and Experimental Investigation. [Master’s Thesis, Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University].
15. Mechanics based model for predicting structure-induced rolling resistance (SRR) of the tire-pavement system10.1007/s11043-016-9313-0 ↗
16. Introducing realistic tire–pavement contact stresses into Pavement Analysis using Nonlinear Damage Approach (PANDA)10.1080/10298436.2016.1141412 ↗
17. Finite Element Modelling and Parametric Analysis of Visco-Elastic and Nonlinear Pavement Responses Under Dynamic FWD loading10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.096 ↗
18. Evaluation of Flexible Pavement Deterioration Conditions Using Deflection Profilers Under Moving Loads10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100434 ↗
19. Pavement Response Evaluation Using Finite-Layer Approach10.3141/1709-06 ↗
20. Backcalculation of Flexible Pavement Layer Moduli from Traffic Speed Deflectometer Data10.3141/2641-09 ↗
21. Tong, B., Habbouche, J., Flintsch, G.W., and Diefenderfer, B.K. (2023). Rutting performance evaluation of BMD surface mixtures with conventional and high RAP contents under full-scale accelerated testing. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16247611 ↗
22. Assessment of the Production Variability and Composite Performance Index for Conventional and High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Balanced Mix Design Mixtures10.1177/03611981241287785 ↗
23. Accurate Measurement of Pavement Deflection Velocity Under Dynamic Loads10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.012 ↗
24. Bathe, K.J. (1996). Finite Element Procedures, Prentice-Hall.
25. (2016). Analysis User’s Guide: Volume I: Introduction, Spatial Modeling, Execution & Output/Volume II: Analysis/Volume III: Materials/Volume IV: Elements; Assault Systems, Simulia.
26. Wang, H. (2011). Analysis of Tire-Pavement Interaction and Pavement Responses Using a Decoupled Modelling Approach. [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign].
27. Flexible Pavement Responses to Different Loading Amplitudes Considering Layer Interface Condition and Lateral Shear Forces10.1080/10298430500516074 ↗
28. Tschoegl, N. (1989). The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Visco-Elastic Behavior: An Introduction, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-73602-5 ↗
29. Numerical comparison of flexible pavement dynamic response under different axles10.1080/10298436.2014.993195 ↗
30. Finite-Element Simulation of Instrumented Asphalt Pavement Response Under Moving Vehicular Load10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001616 ↗
31. Hossain, M.S., and Lane, S. (2023, July 15). Development of a Catalog of Resilient Modulus Values for Aggregate Base for Use with the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), Available online: http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/15-r13.pdf.
32. Richart, F., Hall, J., and Woods, R. (1970). Vibrations of Soils and Foundations, Prentice-Hall.
33. Chopra, A.K. (1995). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake, Prentice-Hall.
34. Carr, A. (2007). Ruaumoko Manual Volume 1: Theory, University of Canterbury.
35. Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Rubber-Modified Asphalt Mixes and Unsaturated Subgrade Soils10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(496) ↗
36. Determining the Ryleigh Damping Parameters of Flexible Pavements for Finite Elements Modeling10.1177/10775463211026763 ↗
37. Natural Frequency Sensitivity Analysis of a Road Based on the Finite Element Method10.25103/jestr.072.31 ↗
38. Dynamic Analysis and in Situ Validation of Perpetual Pavement Response to Vehicular Loading10.3141/2087-04 ↗