journal article·2026-05-07Open access

Assessing Stand-to-Sit Kinematics via mmWave Radar: A Real-to-Sim Robust Bidirectional State-Space Model

Yancheng Liu, Yan Fu, Le Chang, Zhengke Gao, Alex Mihailidis

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 10

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of the Stand-to-Sit (STS) transition serves as a critical indicator of lower-limb frailty in the elderly, for which millimeter-wave radar provides an ideal privacy-preserving, device-free sensing solution. However, robustly distinguishing between safe Controlled Sits (CSs) and dangerous Uncontrolled Descents (UDs) is severely hindered by the prohibitive cost of subjective expert scoring for fine-grained labels, alongside the pervasive “Clever Hans” effect where existing deep models overfit static environmental clutter rather than learning intrinsic human kinematics. To circumvent these bottlenecks, we formulate STS evaluation as a dynamic boundary detection problem and propose SCA-BiMamba, a linear-complexity bidirectional State-Space Model that utilizes actual fall events as extreme kinematic surrogates for UDs. This forces the network to learn a strict physical boundary between CS and physiological failure without subjective grading. Furthermore, we establish a stringent Real-to-Sim diagnostic audit as a core methodological contribution. By projecting models trained on noisy real-world data onto pure-kinematics simulations—incorporating stochastic temporal phase shifts, kinematic overlaps, and unified physiological tremors—we explicitly quantify feature disentanglement. This protocol serves as a formal ‘probing test’ to expose the ‘Clever Hans’ effect, ensuring the model relies on invariant human physics rather than transient environmental artifacts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SCA-BiMamba achieves highly robust classification on real-world data (averaging 94.2% Macro F1 with 100.0% Uncontrolled Descent Recall), and achieves a highly robust 99.4% ± 1.1% Macro F1 in the simulated zero-shot transfer. We emphasize that this optimal performance reflects the successful abstraction of extreme kinematic boundaries, rather than a flawless resolution of all clinical complexities. Concurrently, it exhibits strict resistance to shortcut learning and sustains robust real-world scalability using merely 20% of the training data, thereby establishing a promising privacy-preserving boundary-based radar motion classification framework for distinguishing controlled sitting from extreme instability surrogates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring · Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Wireless Body Area Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Institute of Communication, Culture, Information and Technology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Majumder, S., Aghayi, E., Noferesti, M., Memarzadeh-Tehran, H., Mondal, T., Pang, Z., and Deen, M.J. (2017). Smart Homes for Elderly Healthcare—Recent Advances and Research Challenges. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17112496 ↗
2. A Systematic Review of Wearable Patient Monitoring Systems—Current Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Adoption10.1007/s10916-017-0760-1 ↗
3. Stavropoulos, T.G., Papastergiou, A., Mpaltadoros, L., Nikolopoulos, S., and Kompatsiaris, I. (2020). IoT Wearable Sensors and Devices in Elderly Care: A Literature Review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102826 ↗
4. A Survey on Fall Detection: Principles and Approaches10.1016/j.neucom.2011.09.037 ↗
5. Wang, X., Ellul, J., and Azzopardi, G. (2020). Elderly Fall Detection Systems: A Literature Survey. Front. Robot. AI, 7.10.3389/frobt.2020.00071 ↗
6. Performance-Oriented Assessment of Mobility Problems in Elderly Patients10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x ↗
7. Measuring Balance in the Elderly: Preliminary Development of an Instrument10.3138/ptc.41.6.304 ↗
8. Determinants of the Sit-to-Stand Movement: A Review10.1093/ptj/82.9.866 ↗
9. Witchel, H.J., Oberndorfer, C., Needham, R., Healy, A., Westling, C.E.I., Guppy, J.H., Bush, J., Barth, J., Herberz, C., and Roggen, D. (2018). Thigh-Derived Inertial Sensor Metrics to Assess the Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit Transitions in the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Task for Quantifying Mobility Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Neurol., 9.10.3389/fneur.2018.00684 ↗
10. mmWave Radar for Sit-to-Stand Analysis: A Comparative Study with Wearables and Kinect10.1109/TBME.2025.3548092 ↗
11. Trunk Kinematics and Muscle Activation Patterns during Stand-to-Sit Movement and the Relationship with Postural Stability in Aging10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.03.025 ↗
12. A Survey of Human Motion Analysis Using Depth Imagery10.1016/j.patrec.2013.02.006 ↗
13. Deep learning for computer vision based activity recognition and fall detection of the elderly: A systematic review10.1007/s10489-024-05645-1 ↗
14. Deep Learning-Based Human Pose Estimation: A Survey
15. Deep Learning for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges, and Opportunities
16. A Tutorial on Human Activity Recognition Using Body-Worn Inertial Sensors10.1145/2499621 ↗
17. Buyukakkaslar, M.T., Erturk, M.A., and Aydin, M.A. (2024). A Review on Radar-Based Human Detection Techniques. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24175709 ↗
18. Radar signal processing for elderly fall detection: The future for in-home monitoring10.1109/MSP.2015.2502784 ↗
19. Alanazi, M.A., Alhazmi, A.K., Alsattam, O., Gnau, K., Brown, M., Thiel, S., Jackson, K., and Chodavarapu, V.P. (2022). Towards a Low-Cost Solution for Gait Analysis Using Millimeter Wave Sensor and Machine Learning. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22155470 ↗
20. Contactless Human Activity Analysis Using Radars: A Review
21. Radar-Based Human-Motion Recognition with Deep Learning: Promising Applications for Indoor Monitoring10.1109/MSP.2018.2890128 ↗
22. Abdu, F.J., Zhang, Y., Fu, M., Li, Y., and Deng, Z. (2021). Application of Deep Learning on Millimeter-Wave Radar Signals: A Review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21061951 ↗
23. On the Generalization and Reliability of Single Radar-Based Human Activity Recognition10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088452 ↗
24. Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learn10.1038/s41467-019-08987-4 ↗
25. Roshdibenam, V., Jogerst, G.J., Butler, N.R., and Baek, S. (2021). Machine Learning Prediction of Fall Risk in Older Adults Using Timed Up and Go Test Kinematics. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21103481 ↗
26. Gu, A., and Dao, T. (2023). Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces. arXiv.
27. Zhu, L., Liao, B., Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Liu, W., and Wang, X. (2024). Vision Mamba: Efficient Visual Representation Learning with Bidirectional State Space Model. arXiv.
28. mmFall: Fall Detection Using 4-D mmWave Radar and a Hybrid Variational RNN AutoEncoder10.1109/TASE.2020.3042158 ↗
29. Jeon, W., Dong, X.N., Dalby, A., and Goh, C.H. (2024). The Influence of Smoothness and Speed of Stand-to-Sit Movement on Joint Kinematics, Kinetics, and Muscle Activation Patterns. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 18.10.3389/fnhum.2024.1399179 ↗
30. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018, January 18–22). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
31. Attention Is All You Need
32. Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017, January 22–29). Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗