journal article·2026-05-06Open access

Dynamic 1 g Model Tests on Liquefiable Sands in Newly Proposed ETILam Soil Container and Verification Through 2D and 3D Numerical Analyses

M. Batuhan Koçak, Ozan Alver, Başak Kaya, Emre Gönülcü, E. Ece Eseller-Bayat

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Liquefaction-induced damages related to excess pore water pressure generation in soils and stiffness degradation significantly influence infrastructure and seismic ground response, requiring reliable experimental testing setups and validated numerical models for accurate assessment. This study investigates the free-field liquefaction behavior of saturated sands using the newly proposed ETILam (Enhanced Transparent Impermeable Laminar) soil container under 1 g shaking table conditions. Specimens composed of loose and dense saturated sands overlain by a dry sand layer were prepared and tested under two harmonic motions (0.1 g–2 Hz and 0.2 g–2 Hz), the second motion being two consecutive 6 s excitations. Dynamic response was evaluated through acceleration time histories, shear strains obtained through displacement measurements, excess pore water ratio (ru), response spectra, transfer functions, and Fourier amplitude computations. Fully coupled effective stress analyses were performed in 2D and 3D using calibrated PM4Sand and P2PSand constitutive models. Experimental results showed limited liquefaction for the lower-amplitude motion, whereas the higher-amplitude motion triggered significant shear strains (up to 10%) and ru values approaching 0.8, with depth-dependent dissipation patterns between sequential shakings. Numerical simulations reproduced acceleration amplitudes and general pore-pressure trends, with the 2D model providing closer agreement in both generation and dissipation behavior. The findings validate the ETILam container’s capability to simulate free-field liquefaction response and demonstrate that a well-calibrated 2D approach can reliably capture the essential features of the observed behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Türkiye

School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DT, UK

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye · Istanbul Technical University

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Centrifuge testing to evaluate and mitigate liquefaction-induced building settlement mechanisms10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000306 ↗
2. Numerical and centrifuge modeling of seismic soil–foundation–structure interaction on liquefiable ground10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001346 ↗
3. Centrifuge modeling of seismic foundation-soil-foundation interaction on liquefiable sand10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.019 ↗
4. Centrifuge modeling of mitigation-soil-foundation-structure interaction on liquefiable ground10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.014 ↗
5. Site response in a layered liquefiable deposit: Evaluation of different numerical tools and methodologies with centrifuge experimental results10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001947 ↗
6. Experimental investigation of drainage during earthquake-induced liquefaction10.1680/jgeot.16.P.090 ↗
7. Centrifuge study into the effect of liquefaction extent on permanent settlement and seismic response of shallow foundations10.1016/j.sandf.2017.12.006 ↗
8. Centrifuge model testing on reliquefaction characteristics of sand10.1007/s10518-018-0433-6 ↗
9. Ground response at liquefied sites: Seismic isolation or amplification?10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.028 ↗
10. Influence of a layered liquefiable soil on seismic site response using physical modeling and numerical simulation10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105462 ↗
11. Experimental study on seismic response characteristics of liquefiable soil layers10.1080/13632469.2019.1568930 ↗
12. On the variation of mechanical properties of saturated sand during liquefaction observed in shaking table tests10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105946 ↗
13. Observations and challenges in simulating post-liquefaction settlements from centrifuge and shake table tests10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107089 ↗
14. Shaking table tests on flow dynamics in liquefied slope10.3208/sandf.44.5_67 ↗
15. Evaluation of the effects of shaking history on liquefaction and cone penetration resistance using shake table tests10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106025 ↗
16. Yao, C., Zhong, H., and Zhu, Z. (2024). Development of a large shaking table test for sand liquefaction analysis. Lithosphere, 2024.10.2113/2024/lithosphere_2024_137 ↗
17. Experimental and numerical modeling on the liquefaction potential and ground settlement of silt-interlayered stratified sands10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106691 ↗
18. Influence of structure on the aseismic stability and dynamic responses of liquefiable soil10.1007/s10518-021-01213-x ↗
19. Performance of a Laminar Shear Box for Cohesionless Soil Under Seismic Excitations10.1007/s10706-024-02973-4 ↗
20. Effect of Pavement Thickness and Width on Liquefaction-Induced Settlements and the Contribution of Sand Ejecta in Total Settlement10.1007/s10706-021-01781-4 ↗
21. Shaking table test and numerical simulation of free field in sand-sawdust mixed soil10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107707 ↗
22. Large biaxial laminar shear box for 1-g shaking table tests on saturated sand10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108756 ↗
23. Laminar Soil Container’s Performance Study for Dynamic Laboratory Tests: Comprehensive Review and Numerical Verification10.1007/s12205-024-1122-4 ↗
24. Bagheri, O., Gündüz, M.Ş., Alver, O., and Eseller-Bayat, E.E. (2026). A New Design for Large-Scale Dynamic Soil Testing Setup: ETILam (Enhanced Transparent Impermeable Laminar) Soil Container. J. Earthq. Eng., 1–23.10.1080/13632469.2026.2616730 ↗
25. (2026, March 24). TDG Ankara-Türkiye. Available online: https://tdg.com.tr/en/products/earthquake-simulators/servo-hydraulic/tdg-high-capacity-shake-table.
26. (2026, January 15). TDG Ankara-Türkiye. Available online: https://tdg.com.tr/tr/urunler/ivmeolcer---tiltmetre---sensorler/tiltmetreler/sensebox7001-t.
27. (2026, January 18). ACE, South Korea. Available online: http://aceco.co.kr/home_en/pro_08.php.
28. (2026, January 16). TML, Japan. Available online: https://tml.jp/e/product/transducers/displacement_high.html.
29. Gurbanov, E. (2024). Test Procedure and Sample Preparation for Large Scale Soil Structure Interaction Model Tests in Eitlsc. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
30. Tsuchida, H. (1970). Prediction and countermeasure against the liquefaction in sand deposits, Abstract of the Seminar in the Port and Harbor Research Institute.
31. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2019). FLAC—Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Ver. 8.1, Itasca.
32. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2019). FLAC3D—Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three-Dimensions, Ver. 7.0, Itasca.
33. Plasticity modeling of liquefaction effects under sloping ground and irregular cyclic loading conditions10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.02.013 ↗
34. Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:6(622) ↗
35. Formulation, validation and application of a practice-oriented two-surface plasticity sand model10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103984 ↗
36. Deniz, O. (2021). Development of Liquefaction Resistance Curves of Partially Saturated Sands. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
37. CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388 ↗