Emerging Technologies for Soil Evaluation Using Spectrometry Sensing, Internet of Things and Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
The transition from conventional laboratory-based soil analysis to real-time, data-driven evaluation has become essential for advancing precision agriculture and ensuring sustainable resource management. This review provides a comprehensive and structured synthesis of emerging technologies for soil evaluation, focusing on the integration of spectrometric sensing, Internet of Things (IoT) systems, and machine learning approaches. A systematic analysis of peer-reviewed studies published between 2012 and 2026 was conducted to assess the performance of these technologies in terms of accuracy, robustness, and scalability under variable environmental conditions. Spectrometry techniques, including visible–near-infrared and mid-infrared sensing, enable rapid and non-destructive estimation of soil chemical properties, while IoT-based sensor networks facilitate continuous in situ monitoring of key parameters such as moisture, pH, and nutrient content. Machine learning models further enhance soil assessment by enabling predictive analytics, data fusion, and high-resolution mapping. Despite their significant potential, challenges related to data quality, model transferability, sensor calibration, and implementation costs remain critical barriers to large-scale adoption. The review highlights the need for standardized evaluation frameworks, improved multimodal data integration, and increased focus on model interpretability and real-world applicability. Overall, the synergistic use of these technologies supports more efficient input management, reduces environmental impact, and contributes to the development of resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soil Geostatistics and Mapping · Smart Agriculture and AI · Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Research—Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry—INMA Bucharest, 013811 Bucharest, Romania
Interdisciplinary Research Centre in the Field of Eco-Nano Technology and Advance Materials CC-ITI, Faculty of Engineering, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
Funding
Ministry of Education and Research
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. IT as Enabler of Sustainable Farming: An Empirical Analysis of Farmers’ Adoption Decision of Precision Agriculture Technology10.1016/j.dss.2012.07.002 ↗
2. Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C., and Jones, C.A. (2010). Growth and Mineral Nutrition of Field Crops, CRC Press.10.1201/b10160 ↗
3. Jawad, H.M., Nordin, R., Gharghan, S.K., Jawad, A.M., and Ismail, M. (2017). Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks for Precision Agriculture: A Review. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17081781 ↗
4. Senapaty, M.K., Ray, A., and Padhy, N. (2023). IoT-Enabled Soil Nutrient Analysis and Crop Recommendation Model for Precision Agriculture. Computers, 12.10.3390/computers12030061 ↗
5. Soussi, A., Zero, E., Sacile, R., Trinchero, D., and Fossa, M. (2024). Smart Sensors and Smart Data for Precision Agriculture: A Review. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24082647 ↗
6. Padhy, N., Sen, A., and Kumar, R. (2023). Sustainable Soil Management: Challenges and Opportunities. PLoS ONE, 18.
7. Bhatti, U.A., Masud, M., Bazai, S.U., and Tang, H. (2023). AI-Based Smart Precision Agriculture Techniques. Front. Plant Sci., 14.10.3389/fpls.2023.1237783 ↗
8. Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A review for policy implications10.1007/s11119-012-9273-6 ↗
9. United Nations Development Programme (2021). Precision Agriculture for Smallholder Farmers, United Nations Development Programme. Available online: https://www.undp.org/publications/precision-agriculture-smallholder-farmers.
10. Silva, A.F., Ohta, R.L., Azpiroz, J.T., Ferreira, M.E., Marçal, D.V., Botelho, A., Coppola, T., Oliveira, A.F.M., Bettarello, M., and Schneider, L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Enables Mobile Soil Analysis for Sustainable Agriculture. arXiv.
11. The Use of Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for In-Situ Characterization of Agricultural Soil Fertility: A Proposition of Best Practice by Comparing Scanning Positions and Spectrometers10.1111/sum.12952 ↗
12. Application of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Agriculture and Forestry10.1007/s44211-022-00106-6 ↗
13. Fusion of Vis-NIR and XRF Spectra for Estimation of Key Soil Attributes10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114851 ↗
14. Ganga, A., Elia, M., and Repe, B. (2023). Applications of GIS and Remote Sensing in Soil Environment Monitoring. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151813705 ↗
15. Misbah, K., Laamrani, A., Khechba, K., Dhiba, D., and Chehbouni, A. (2022). Multi-Sensors Remote Sensing Applications for Assessing, Monitoring, and Mapping NPK Content in Soil and Crops in African Agricultural Land. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14010081 ↗
16. Abdellatif, M.A., El Baroudy, A.A., Arshad, M., Mahmoud, E.K., Saleh, A.M., Moghanm, F.S., Shaltout, K.H., Eid, E.M., and Shokr, M.S. (2021). A GIS-Based Approach for the Quantitative Assessment of Soil Quality and Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132313438 ↗
17. Adaptive design optimization of wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithms10.1016/j.comnet.2006.06.013 ↗
18. Musa, P., Sugeru, H., and Wibowo, E.P. (2024). Wireless Sensor Networks for Precision Agriculture: A Review of NPK Sensor Implementations. Sensors, 24.10.20944/preprints202309.0277.v1 ↗
19. Future Directions of Precision Agriculture10.1007/s11119-005-0681-8 ↗
20. Lloret, J., Sendra, S., Garcia, L., and Jimenez, J.M. (2021). A Wireless Sensor Network Deployment for Soil Moisture Monitoring in Precision Agriculture. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21217243 ↗
21. Tiwari, S., Garg, R., Kushal, N., and Khurana, M. (2023). IoT-Based Real-Time Crop and Fertilizer Prediction for Precision Farming 4.0. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations in Computational Intelligence and Computer Vision, Jaipur, India, 13 October 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-981-99-2602-2_53 ↗
22. Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.007 ↗
23. Garcia, L., Parra, L., Jimenez, J.M., Parra, M., Lloret, J., Mauri, P.V., and Lorenz, P. (2021). Deployment Strategies of Soil Monitoring WSN for Precision Agriculture Irrigation Scheduling in Rural Areas. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21051693 ↗
24. Xing, Y., Liu, X., and Wang, X. (2026). Integrating UAVs, satellite remote sensing, and machine learning in precision agriculture: Pathways to sustainable food production, resource efficiency, and scalable innovation. Front. Agron., 7.10.3389/fagro.2025.1670380 ↗
25. El-Jamaoui, I., Delgado-Iniesta, M.J., Martínez Sánchez, M.J., Pérez Sirvent, C., and Martínez López, S. (2025). Assessing Soil Organic Carbon in Semi-Arid Agricultural Soils Using UAVs and Machine Learning: A Pathway to Sustainable Water and Soil Resource Management. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17083440 ↗
26. Nowatzki, J. (2021). Basics of LoRa Technology for Crop and Livestock Management. North Dakota State University Extension Publication, North Dakota State University. Available online: https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/extension/publications/basics-lora-technology-crop-and-livestock-management.
27. Machine Learning for Digital Soil Mapping: Applications, Challenges and Suggested Solutions10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103359 ↗
28. Using deep learning to predict soil properties from regional spectral data10.1016/j.geodrs.2018.e00198 ↗
29. Improving the Spatial Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon Using Environmental Covariates Selection: A Comparison of a Group of Environmental Covariates10.1016/j.catena.2021.105723 ↗
30. Botero-Valencia, J., García-Pineda, V., Valencia-Arias, A., Valencia, J., Reyes-Vera, E., Mejia-Herrera, M., and Hernández-García, R. (2025). Machine Learning in Sustainable Agriculture: Systematic Review and Research Perspectives. Agriculture, 15.10.3390/agriculture15040377 ↗
31. A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.037 ↗
32. Big data in smart farming–A review10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023 ↗
33. Liakos, K.G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., and Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18082674 ↗
34. Delgado, J.A., Short, N.M., Roberts, D.P., and Vandenberg, B. (2019). Big Data Analysis for Sustainable Agriculture on a Geospatial Cloud Framework. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 3.10.3389/fsufs.2019.00054 ↗
35. AI and Machine Learning for Soil Analysis: An Assessment of Sustainable Approaches10.1186/s40643-023-00710-y ↗
36. Vargas-Terminel, M.L., Flores-Rentería, D., Sánchez-Mejía, Z.M., Rojas-Robles, N.E., Sandoval-Aguilar, M., Chávez-Vergara, B., Robles-Morua, A., Garatuza-Payan, J., and Yépez, E.A. (2022). Soil Respiration Is Influenced by Seasonality, Forest Succession and Contrasting Biophysical Controls in a Tropical Dry Forest in Northwestern Mexico. Soil Syst., 6.10.3390/soilsystems6040075 ↗
37. Automatic fruit picking technology: A comprehensive review of research advances10.1007/s10462-023-10674-2 ↗
38. Fertilization and soil management machine learning based sustainable agronomic prescriptions for durum wheat in Italy10.1007/s11119-024-10153-w ↗
39. Synergistic integration of metaheuristics and machine learning: Latest advances and emerging trends10.1007/s10462-025-11266-y ↗
40. A survey on ensemble learning10.1007/s11704-019-8208-z ↗
41. Optimal soil sampling design for calibrating soil maps based on Digital Soil Mapping
42. Sarangi, A., Raula, S.K., Ghoshal, S., Kumar, S., Kumar, C.S., and Padhy, N. (2024). Enhancing Process Control in Agriculture: Leveraging Machine Learning for Soil Fertility Assessment. Eng. Proc., 67.10.3390/engproc2024067031 ↗
43. Ben-Dor, E., Irons, J.R., and Epema, G.F. (1999). Soil Reflectance. Remote Sensing for the Earth Sciences, John Wiley & Sons.
44. Site-Specific Economic Optimal Nitrogen Rate Prediction Using Machine Learning for Corn Production
45. Kaur, J., Hazrati Fard, S.M., Amiri-Zarandi, M., and Dara, R. (2022). Protecting Farmers’ Data Privacy and Confidentiality: Recommendations and Considerations. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 6.10.3389/fsufs.2022.903230 ↗
46. Simultaneous Measurement of Multiple Soil Properties through Proximal Sensor Data Fusion: A Case Study10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.006 ↗
47. Pizarro, S., Ccopi, D., Ortega, K., Contreras, D., Ñaupari, J., Cano, D., Patricio, S., Loayza, H., and Apolo-Apolo, O.E. (2026). Vis-NIR Spectroscopy and Machine Learning for Prediction of Soil Fertility Indicators and Fertilizer Recommendation in Andean Highland and Rainforest Agroecosystems. Remote Sens., 18.10.3390/rs18091331 ↗
48. Shokati, H., Mashal, M., Noroozi, A., Mirzaei, S., Mohammadi-Doqozloo, Z., Nabiollahi, K., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Khosravani, P., Adhikari, R., and Hu, L. (2025). Comparing UAV-Based Hyperspectral and Satellite-Based Multispectral Data for Soil Moisture Estimation Using Machine Learning. Water, 17.10.3390/w17111715 ↗
49. Liu, Q., Wu, Z., Cui, N., Jin, X., Zhu, S., Jiang, S., Zhao, L., and Gong, D. (2023). Estimation of Soil Moisture Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms in Farming Land of Northern China. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15174214 ↗
50. Combining UAV-Based Hyperspectral Imagery and Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Moisture Content Monitoring10.7717/peerj.6926 ↗
51. Wang, Q., Chen, X., Meng, H., Miao, H., Jiang, S., and Chang, Q. (2023). UAV Hyperspectral Data Combined with Machine Learning for Winter Wheat Canopy SPAD Values Estimation. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15194658 ↗
52. Estimation of Soil Moisture Content under High Maize Canopy Coverage from UAV Multimodal Data and Machine Learning10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107530 ↗
53. Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Content Using Airborne Multispectral Imagery and Machine Learning10.1016/j.atech.2024.100719 ↗
54. Proximal Soil Sensing: An Effective Approach for Soil Measurements in Space and Time10.1016/B978-0-12-386473-4.00005-1 ↗
55. Reconstructing Satellite Temporal Series Data Under Cloudy Conditions: Application in Predicting Rice Growth Phases10.1016/j.atech.2025.101378 ↗
56. Visible and Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Soil Science10.1016/S0065-2113(10)07005-7 ↗
57. Kandpal, L.M., Munnaf, M.A., Cruz, C., and Mouazen, A.M. (2022). Spectra Fusion of Mid-Infrared (MIR) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectroscopy for Estimation of Selected Soil Fertility Attributes. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093459 ↗
58. Prediction of Soil Fertility via Portable X-ray Fluorescence (PXRF) Spectrometry and Soil Texture in the Brazilian Coastal Plains10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113960 ↗
59. Bhimji, W., Farrell, S.A., Kurth, T., Paganini, M., and Racah, E. (2017). Deep Neural Networks for Physics Analysis on Low-level Whole-detector Data at the LHC. arXiv.10.1088/1742-6596/1085/4/042034 ↗
60. Zhang, X., Han, L., Sobeih, T., Lappin, L., Lee, M., Howard, A., and Kisdi, A. (2021). The Self-Supervised Spectral-Spatial Attention-Based Transformer Network for Automated, Accurate Prediction of Crop Nitrogen Status from UAV Imagery. arXiv.10.3390/rs14061400 ↗
61. NDVI as a Potential Tool for Predicting Biomass, Plant Nitrogen Content and Growth in Wheat Genotypes Subjected to Different Water and Nitrogen Conditions
62. Pechanec, V., Mráz, A., Rozkošný, L., and Vyvlečka, P. (2021). Usage of Airborne Hyperspectral Imaging Data for Identifying Spatial Variability of Soil Nitrogen Content. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10.10.3390/ijgi10060355 ↗
63. Omidi, R., Moghimi, A., Pourreza, A., El-Hadedy, M., and Salah Eddin, A. (2020). Ensemble Hyperspectral Band Selection for Detecting Nitrogen Status in Grape Leaves. arXiv.10.1109/ICMLA51294.2020.00054 ↗
64. Design and testing of a variable fertilization system based on soil nutrient detection10.35633/inmateh-73-15 ↗
65. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006 ↗
66. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., and Watanabe, F.S. (1954). Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate, USDA Circular No. 939.
67. Miller, T., Mikiciuk, G., Durlik, I., Mikiciuk, M., Łobodzińska, A., and Śnieg, M. (2025). The IoT and AI in Agriculture: The Time Is Now—A Systematic Review of Smart Sensing Technologies. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25123583 ↗
68. An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and Data Analytics in Agriculture: Benefits and Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2018.2844296 ↗
69. Rapid in-field soil analysis of plant-available nutrients and pH for precision agriculture—A review10.1007/s11119-024-10181-6 ↗
70. Narayan, T., Reidy, M.-K., Heelan, S., O’Riordan, A., and Shao, H. (2023). Real-Time Electrochemical Sensor for Phosphate Sensing in Soil-Water. ChemRxiv.10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-zl4hz ↗
71. Innovative methods in soil phosphorus research: A review10.1002/jpln.201400327 ↗
72. Evaluation of Nitrate and Potassium Ion-Selective Membranes for Soil Macronutrient Sensing10.13031/2013.20476 ↗
73. Su, R., Wu, J., Hu, J., Ma, L., Ahmed, S., Zhang, Y., Abdulraheem, M.I., Birech, Z., Li, L., and Li, C. (2022). Minimalizing Non-point Source Pollution Using a Cooperative Ion-Selective Electrode System for Estimating Nitrate Nitrogen in Soil. Front. Plant Sci., 12.10.3389/fpls.2021.810214 ↗
74. Ma, Y.P., Chen, Z.C., Fan, Y.G., Bian, M.B., Yang, G.J., Chen, R.Q., and Feng, H.K. (2023). Estimating Potassium in Potato Plants Based on Multispectral Images Acquired from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Front. Plant Sci., 14.10.3389/fpls.2023.1265132 ↗
75. Estimating Swiss chard foliar macro- and micronutrient concentrations under different irrigation water sources using ground-based hyperspectral data and four partial least squares (PLS)-based (PLS1, PLS2, SPLS1 and SPLS2) regression algorithms10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.008 ↗
76. Sen, A., Roy, R., and Dash, S.R. (2021). Smart farming using machine learning and IoT. Agricultural Informatics: Automation Using the IoT and Machine Learning, Wiley-Scrivener.10.1002/9781119769231.ch2 ↗
77. Electrochemical Detection of Iron in a Lixiviant Solution of Polluted Soil Using a Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode10.1155/2012/739408 ↗
78. Predicting soil properties from the Australian soil visible–near infrared spectroscopic database10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01495.x ↗
79. Soil mapping for precision agriculture using support vector machines combined with inverse distance weighting10.1007/s11119-022-09880-9 ↗
80. Nawar, S., and Mouazen, A.M. (2017). Comparison between Random Forests, Artificial Neural Networks and Gradient Boosted Machines Methods of On-Line Vis-NIR Spectroscopy Measurements of Soil Total Nitrogen and Total Carbon. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17102428 ↗
81. Incorporating Soil Knowledge into Machine-Learning Prediction of Soil Properties from Soil Spectra10.1111/ejss.13438 ↗
82. Monitoring Metal Pollution in Soils Using Portable-XRF and Conventional Laboratory-Based Techniques: Evaluation of the Performance and Limitations According to Metal Properties and Sources10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.178 ↗
83. Metals analysis of agricultural soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry10.1007/s00128-014-1236-3 ↗
84. Portable X-ray Fluorescence for Environmental Assessment of Soils: Not Just a Point and Shoot Method10.1016/j.envint.2019.105250 ↗
85. Role of Soil Physical Properties in Soil Health Management and Crop Productivity in Rainfed Systems–II. Management Technologies and Crop Productivity10.18520/cs/v110/i3/320-328 ↗
86. Callesen, I., Palviainen, M., Armolaitis, K., Rasmussen, C., and Kjønaas, O.J. (2023). Soil Texture Analysis by Laser Diffraction and Sedimentation and Sieving–Method and Instrument Comparison with a Focus on Nordic and Baltic Forest Soils. Front. For. Glob. Change, 6.10.3389/ffgc.2023.1144845 ↗
87. Alsafran, M., Usman, K., Ahmed, B., Rizwan, M., Saleem, M.H., and Al Jabri, H. (2022). Understanding the Phytoremediation Mechanisms of Potentially Toxic Elements: A Proteomic Overview of Recent Advances. Front. Plant Sci., 13.10.3389/fpls.2022.881242 ↗
88. Advances in Portable X-ray Fluorescence (PXRF) for Environmental, Pedological, and Agronomic Applications10.1016/B978-0-12-802139-2.00001-9 ↗
89. Soil Texture Analysis Using Controlled Image Processing10.1016/j.atech.2024.100588 ↗
90. Soil Texture Identification Using LIBS Data Combined with Machine Learning Algorithm10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170691 ↗
91. Ghosh, T., Maity, P.P., Rabbi, S.M.F., Das, T.K., and Bhattacharyya, R. (2023). Application of X-ray computed tomography in soil and plant—A review. Front. Environ. Sci., 11.10.3389/fenvs.2023.1216630 ↗
92. Fang, H., Zhang, N., Yu, Z., Li, D., Peng, X., and Zhou, H. (2024). Micro-CT Analysis of Pore Structure in Upland Red Soil Under Different Long-Term Fertilization Regimes. Agronomy, 14.10.3390/agronomy14112668 ↗
93. Remote Sensing in the Analysis and Characterization of Spatial Variability of the Territory: A Study Case in Timis County, Romania
94. Forkuor, G., Hounkpatin, O.K.L., Welp, G., and Thiel, M. (2017). High Resolution Mapping of Soil Properties Using Remote Sensing Variables in South-Western Burkina Faso: A Comparison of Machine Learning and Multiple Linear Regression Models. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0170478 ↗
95. Abdulraheem, M.I., Zhang, W., Li, S., Moshayedi, A.J., Farooque, A.A., and Hu, J. (2023). Advancement of Remote Sensing for Soil Measurements and Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152115444 ↗
96. Machine Learning Models for Gully Erosion Susceptibility Assessment in the Tensift Catchment, Haouz Plain, Morocco for Sustainable Development10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2024.105229 ↗
97. The Effect of No-Till Farming on the Soil Functions of Water Purification and Retention in North-Western Europe: A Literature Review10.1016/j.still.2019.01.004 ↗
98. Measurement of Volumetric Water Content by Gravimetric and Time Domain Reflectometry Methods at Field Experiment with Biochar and N Fertilizer
99. Evaluation of Standard Calibration Functions for Eight Electromagnetic Soil Moisture Sensors10.2136/vzj2012.0160 ↗
100. Huang, H., Liu, B., Hu, M., Tao, Y., and Xiang, W. (2018). User-Information-Aware D2D Multicast File Distribution Mechanism. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18103389 ↗