journal article·2023-12-06

Assessing permanent deformation potential of asphalt mixtures based on viscoelastic characteristics

Meng Ling, Sang Ick Lee, Jie Ji, Luis Fuentes, Lubinda F. Walubita

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, permanent deformation potential of different asphalt mixtures subjected to the same aging condition was assessed, based on viscoelastic characteristics from the dynamic modulus (DM) test. First it was shown that the HWTT and RLPD test results were not well correlated, which might be due to the differences in the boundary condition and the impacts of moisture damage and stripping in the HWTT. The analysis results suggested that the shape parameter (γ) of the DM master-curves could be utilized to assess the rutting resistance potential of the asphalt mixtures from the RLPD test, compared to other rheological parameters such as the inflection point frequency and β. The |E*| at the RLPD test condition was well correlated to the rutting performance compared to the asphalt mixture’s rutting parameter |E*|/sinδ and the |E*| at the inflection point frequency. A novel rutting parameter (VERIndex) was developed to assess the rutting resistance potential of the asphalt mixtures, which simultaneously accounts for the |E*| and slope of the DM master-curves. Thereafter, the cracking and rutting performance thresholds were proposed, and, correspondingly used in the performance space diagram to aid with implementing the balanced mix design approach using the viscoelastic characteristics of asphalt mixtures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Austin, TX, USA

Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia

Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI), The Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, USA

Funding

Texas Department of Transportation

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/JPEODX.000029810.1061/JPEODX.0000298 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12036610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120366 ↗
3. 10.1680/tran.9.0005610.1680/tran.9.00056 ↗
4. 10.1080/14680629.2020.176654510.1080/14680629.2020.1766545 ↗
5. Bhasin, A., Button, J.W., and Chowdhury, A., 2003. Evaluation of simple performance tests on HMA mixtures from the south central United States. Rep. No: FHWA/TX-03/9-558-1. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
6. Birgisson B. et al. 2004. The use of complex modulus to characterize the performance of asphalt mixtures and pavements in Florida (No. Final Report).
7. 10.1080/10298436.2020.178803010.1080/10298436.2020.1788030 ↗
8. Coleri, E., Sreedhar, S., and Obaid, I.A., 2020. Development of a balanced mix design method in Oregon (No. FHWA-OR-RD-21-03). Salem, OR: Dept. of Transportation. Research Section.
9. Elias, N.G., et al., 2021. Local agency transition to balanced mix design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23, 1–11.
10. Hu S. Zhou F. and Scullion T. 2014. Development of Texas mechanistic-empirical flexible pavement design system (TxME) (No. FHWA/TX-14/0-6622-2).
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.006 ↗
12. 10.1177/036119812091429210.1177/0361198120914292 ↗
13. 10.1617/s11527-014-0464-710.1617/s11527-014-0464-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.15610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.156 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10732410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107324 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10634510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106345 ↗
17. 10.1080/10298436.2022.212697610.1080/10298436.2022.2126976 ↗
18. Lytton R.L. Luo X. Saha S. Chen Y. Deng Y. Gu F. & Ling M. (2019). Proposed enhancements to pavement ME design: improved consideration of the influence of subgrade and unbound layers on pavement performance (No. NCHRP Project 01-53).
19. Martin A.E. et al. 2019. Evaluating the effects of recycling agents on asphalt mixtures with high RAS and RAP binder ratios. NCHRP Research Report (927).
20. 10.1061/JPEODX.000017110.1061/JPEODX.0000171 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12888910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128889 ↗
22. 10.1061/JPEODX.000023410.1061/JPEODX.0000234 ↗
23. Sivasubramaniam, S. and Haddock, J.E., 2005. Validation of Superpave mixture design and analysis procedures using the NCAT test track. Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2005/24. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
24. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138068810.1080/14680629.2017.1380688 ↗
25. 10.1080/10298436.2020.179247010.1080/10298436.2020.1792470 ↗
26. TxDOT, 2014. Texas department of transportation. Standard specifications for construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and bridges. Austin, TX.
27. TxDOT, 2021. Texas department of transportation. Test procedure for the Hamburg wheel-tracking test, TxDOT designation: Tex-242-F. Austin, TX.
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.03110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.031 ↗
29. Walubita, L.F., et al., 2017. Texas flexible pavements and overlays: year 5 report-complete data documentation (No. FHWA/TX-15/0-6658-3). College Station, TX: A&M Transportation Institute.
30. 10.1007/s42947-019-0014-310.1007/s42947-019-0014-3 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12076110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120761 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12102910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121029 ↗
33. 10.1061/JPEODX.000038610.1061/JPEODX.0000386 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.010 ↗
35. Walubita, L.F., Hoeffner, J., and Scullion, T., 2012. New generation mix-designs: laboratory-field testing and modifications to Texas HMA mix-design procedures (No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6132-3). Austin, TX: Dept. of Transportation. Research and Technology Implementation Office.
36. 10.3141/2208-0510.3141/2208-05 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12998010.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129980 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12302010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123020 ↗