On the Artifacts Involved in the Measurements of Engineering 3D Topography and a Correction Method
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface roughness is a key tribological property commonly characterized by the power spectral density (PSD) of surface topography. However, the recent Surface Topography Challenge demonstrated that measurements of identical surfaces may yield PSD curves differing by several orders of magnitude depending on the laboratory and measurement method. Such discrepancies can arise from measurement artifacts, including spike-like outliers and macroscopic surface curvature. In this work, we analyze these effects and propose a correction procedure for recovering the intrinsic roughness spectrum. The method combines nonlinear median filtering for artifact detection with robust PSD reconstruction based on multiple one-dimensional surface sections. Outliers are removed in real space, the macroscopic shape is eliminated by detrending, and the PSD is obtained as the median of spectra from individual line scans. Tests on synthetic surfaces with known roughness spectra contaminated by curvature and artificial spikes demonstrate that the method reliably recovers the original spectrum even when artifacts dominate the raw data. Application to experimentally measured surfaces further indicates that some apparent roughness features may originate from measurement noise and stitching artifacts rather than the true surface structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems, Samarkand State University, Samarkand 140104, Uzbekistan
Department of System Dynamics and Friction Physics, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Center of Advanced Studies in Mechanics, Tribology, Bio- and Nanotechnologies, Samarkand State University, Samarkand 140104, Uzbekistan
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Persson, B.N.J. (2000). Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-04283-0 ↗
2. Bowden, F.P., and Tabor, D. (1950). The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Clarendon Press.
3. Popov, V.L. (2010). Contact Mechanics and Friction: Physical Principles and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-10803-7 ↗
4. Wang, Q.J., and Chung, Y. (2013). Encyclopedia of Tribology, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5 ↗
5. The area of contact between stationary and moving surfaces
6. An ultrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces
7. On the plastic contact of rough surfaces
8. Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties10.1007/BF00874332 ↗
9. Imaging surface contacts: Power-law contact distributions and contact stresses in quartz, calcite, glass and acrylic plastic10.1016/0040-1951(95)00165-4 ↗
10. Contact of rough surfaces: A review of experimental work10.1016/0043-1648(80)90162-3 ↗
11. Elucidation of contact state on various rough surfaces via highly robust colorimetric optical interferometry10.1038/s41598-021-04104-y ↗
12. On the nature of surface roughness with application to contact mechanics, sealing, rubber friction and adhesion10.1088/0953-8984/17/1/R01 ↗
13. Contact between rough surfaces and a criterion for macroscopic adhesion10.1073/pnas.1320846111 ↗
14. Contact mechanics of rough surfaces: A comparison between the theories10.1007/s11012-010-9315-y ↗
15. Surface roughness effect on friction behaviour of elastomeric material10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.127 ↗
16. Generalized law of friction between elastomers and differently shaped rough bodies10.1038/srep03750 ↗
17. Meeting the contact-mechanics challenge10.1007/s11249-017-0900-2 ↗
18. Programming superlyophobic interfaces via fine-tuning surface chemistry: From controllable fabrication to intelligent manipulation10.1016/j.cis.2025.103765 ↗
19. The Surface-Topography Challenge: A Multi-Laboratory Benchmark Study to Advance the Characterization of Topography10.1007/s11249-025-02014-y ↗
20. Roughness parameters10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2 ↗
21. Long-Term Storage Capacity of Reservoirs10.1061/TACEAT.0006518 ↗
22. Borodich, F.M., Pepelyshev, A., and Jin, X. (2024). A Multiscale Statistical Analysis of Rough Surfaces and Applications to Tribology. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12121804 ↗
23. Popov, V.L., and Heß, M. (2015). Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-53876-6 ↗
24. Lyashenko, I.A., Pham, T.H., and Popov, V.L. (2024). Friction in Adhesive Contact Between a Rough Hard Indenter and Smooth Soft Elastomer Layer. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12110754 ↗
25. Lanczos, C. (1988). Applied Analysis, Dover Publications.
26. (2026, April 21). Available online: https://github.com/torkian/vk4-python-driver.
27. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb’s J. Softw
28. Navier–Stokes, Fluid Dynamics, and Image and Video Inpainting
29. An Image Inpainting Technique Based on the Fast Marching Method10.1080/10867651.2004.10487596 ↗