journal article·2026-05-02Open access

A Novel Approach to Design Flood Hydrograph Plotting in Water Management

Cornel Ilinca, Constantin Albert, Dmytro Rozputniak, Valentin Minghiraș

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

This study proposes a unified analytical framework for plotting design flood hydrographs (DFH) based on four characteristic parameters: total duration (Tt), time to peak (Tp), flood volume (W), and peak discharge (Qp) associated with specific exceedance probabilities. The objective is to improve the mathematical representation of hydrograph shapes for engineering applications and future updates of hydrological design standards. Leveraging a dataset of 150 representative cross-sections of Romanian rivers, the research employs normalized axes to facilitate a dimensionless comparative analysis. This study presents three modeling approaches: the Refined Rational Function (RRF), which significantly enhances the framework initially developed by Radu Cadariu; a [4/4] Padé approximant, transitioning from a second-degree to a fourth-degree rational framework and featuring a depressed quartic numerator and a fourth-degree denominator for superior degrees of freedom; and the plotting of non-parametric hydrographs via natural cubic spline interpolation. The results demonstrate that the RRF method extends the admissible range of the shape coefficient γ beyond the traditional interval 0.15–0.50, enabling representation of hydrographs with γ values up to 0.99. The [4/4] Padé approximant provides improved flexibility for asymmetric and multimodal hydrographs, while the natural cubic spline interpolation method ensures accurate reconstruction of atypical hydrographs with volume conservation errors below 3%. These methods offer a unified, objective framework, ensuring high accuracy and adaptability across diverse Romanian hydrological regimes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Drought Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Hydroengineering and Water Resources Management, Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest, 020396 Bucharest, Romania

Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania

Independent Researcher, 307220 Giroc, Romania

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Popovici, A. (2002). Baraje Pentru Acumulări de Apă, Vol. II, Editura Tehnică. (In Romanian).
2. National Administration “Romanian Waters” (2024, March 15). Approach Used to Calculate Return Periods and Probabilities. (In Romanian).
3. Ilinca, C. (2026, March 15). Reverse Engineering Analysis: Hydraulic Calculation Summary for Mihăileni Dam. (In Romanian).
4. Flood type specific construction of synthetic design hydrographs10.1002/2016WR019535 ↗
5. Platagea, G. (1967). Studii de Hidrologie XXII: Monografia Hidrologică a Bazinului Hidrografic al Rîului Siret [Hydrological Studies XXII: Hydrological Monograph of the Siret River Watershed, Institutul de Studii și Cercetări Hidrotehnice.
6. The design flood under two approaches: Synthetic storm hyetograph and observed storm hyetograph10.1080/23249676.2020.1787242 ↗
7. Erić, R., Đukić, V., and Anđelić, N. (2019). Comparison of Clark and Snyder Unit Hydrograph methods for surface runoff modeling. Erozija, 31–46.10.5937/erozija1945031E ↗
8. Comparison of synthetic unit hydrograph methods for flood assessment in a dryland, poorly gauged basin (Napostá Grande, Argentina)10.3934/geosci.2025003 ↗
9. Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Methods: A Critical Review10.2174/1874378101105010001 ↗
10. Diacon, C., and Serban, P. (1994). Hydrological Syntheses and Regionalizations, Technical Publishing House. (In Romanian).
11. Constantinescu, M., Goldstein, M., Haram, V., and Solomon, S. (1956). Hydrology, Technical Publishing House. (In Romanian).
12. Şen, Z. (2017). Flood Modeling, Prediction and Mitigation, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-52356-9 ↗
13. Improving event-based methods for modelling flood risk in a variable and non-stationary climate
14. Coronado-Hernández, O.E., Fuertes-Miquel, V.S., and Arrieta-Pastrana, A. (2024). The Development of a Hydrological Method for Computing Extreme Hydrographs in Engineering Dam Projects. Hydrology, 11.10.3390/hydrology11110194 ↗
15. Alexander, W.J.R. (2002). Estimating Flood Peaks and Hydrographs for Small Catchments, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Pretoria. Report R6: Estimating Design Hydrographs.
16. Approach for Describing Statistical Properties of Flood Hydrograph10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:2(147) ↗
17. Development of design flood hydrographs using probability density functions10.1002/hyp.7494 ↗
18. Generation of type-specific synthetic design flood hydrographs10.1080/02626667.2023.2195560 ↗
19. Probability models for unit hydrograph derivation10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.07.004 ↗
20. Synthetic Design Hydrographs Based on Distribution Functions with Finite Support10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000339 ↗
21. Machine learning-based hydrograph modeling with LSTM: A case study in the Jatigede Reservoir Catchment, Indonesia10.1016/j.rines.2025.100090 ↗
22. Arrieta-Pastrana, A., Coronado-Hernández, O.E., and Ramos, H.M. (2025). Simulation of Ex-treme Hydrographs in Heterogeneous Catchments with Limited Data. Water, 17.10.3390/w17111713 ↗
23. Kyanjo, B., Calhoun, D., and George, D.L. (2024). GeoFlood (v1.0.0): Computational model for overland flooding. arXiv.10.20944/preprints202403.1029.v1 ↗
24. Estimation of parametric flood hydrograph determined by means of Strupczewski method in the Vistula and Odra catchments10.1515/jwld-2016-0035 ↗
25. Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., Cappelli, F., Piscopia, R., Bianchini, S., Centola, A., Scarola, M., de Gennaro, V., and Giove, R.M. (2025). An Interactive Platform for Design Hydrograph Estimation in Small and Ungauged Basins: Pilot Implementation in the Lazio Region, Italy. Water, 17.10.3390/w17213122 ↗
26. (1987). Annual Probabilities of Maximum Flows and Volumes Under Normal and Special Operating Conditions (Standard No. STAS 4068/2-87).
27. (1982). Maximum Water Discharges and Volumes, Determination of maximum Water Discharges and Volumes of Watercourses (Standard No. STAS 4068/1-82).
28. (2012). Technical Regulation Containing the Normative Regarding the Establishment of Maximum Flows and Volumes for the Calculation of Hydrotechnical Retention Constructions (Standard No. NP129-2011).
29. Synthetic unit hydrograph technique for the design of flood alleviation works in urban areas
30. Mociorniță, C., and Birtu, E. (1988). Development of the Cadastre of Hydrological Parameters of Rivers in the Republic of Romania, Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, River and Lake Hydrology Section. (In Romanian).
31. Dimensionless analytical model for the shape of singular theoretical floods
32. Using rational functions to improve the results of approximating a function
33. Jeng, S.W., and Kilicman, A. (2020). Series Expansion and Fourth-Order Global Padé Approximation for a Rough Heston Solution. Mathematics, 8.10.3390/math8111968 ↗
34. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm
35. Nonparametric design hydrograph in the gauged cross sections of the Vistula and Odra basin10.26491/mhwm/67911 ↗
36. Gądek, W., Baziak, B., Tokarczyk, T., and Szalińska, W. (2022). A Novel Method of Design Flood Hydrographs Estimation for Flood Hazard Mapping. Water, 14.10.3390/w14121856 ↗
37. A study of cubic spline interpolation
38. Dăneț, N. (2009). Cubic spline interpolation using Mathcad. Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Applications of Mathematics and Informatics (ICTAMI 2009), Acta Universitatis Apulensis. Special Issue.
39. Rao, S.S. (2002). Applied Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientiests, Prentice Hall.