Development of performance related specifications for chip seal treatments
Source abstract
Abstract
Road agencies are increasingly incorporating performance-related specifications (PRS) in construction contracts to specify quality in terms of parameters related to desired long-term performance. PRS provides a means to account for the value lost or gained by the variances of the designed performance parameters from the specified target values. The use of PRS for pavement preservation treatments (e.g. chip seals) has been generally non-existent. The objective of this paper is to establish a step-by-step procedure for formulating chip seals PRS guidelines. The percent embedment (PE) of aggregates into emulsified asphalt was selected as the acceptance quality characteristic (AQC). Chip seal specimens with varying percent embedment levels were prepared using aggregate and emulsion types in Michigan. Aggregate loss and bleeding were selected as performance indicators. Laboratory tests were conducted to compute PE, aggregate loss and bleeding for the chip seal specimens. Relationships were developed between quality measures, service life, and pay factors. The expected pay curves were developed based on quality measures and were used to establish acceptable and unacceptable quality levels. The pay factors were evaluated to ensure fair payments for the quality of work produced. The work presented will provide the general guidelines for developing PRS for chip seal projects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical and construction materials studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Funding
Michigan Department of Transportation
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.019 ↗
2. Boz, I.et al., 2018.Establishing percent embedment limits to improve chip seal performance: Mdot report no. Spr-1679.
3. 10.1177/036119811882137010.1177/0361198118821370 ↗
4. Burati J.L. · 2003
5. Chatti, K.et al., 2017.Performance-related specifications for pavement preservation treatments.10.17226/24945 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000040510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000405 ↗
7. Gransberg, D.D., and James, D.M.B., 2005.Chip seal best practices.
8. Huges, C.S.et al., 2011.Guidelines for quality related pay adjustment factors for pavements, NCHRP 10-79.10.17226/22656 ↗
9. Kim M. · Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions · 2015 · 84 · 369
10. Kumbargeri Y. · 2018
11. 10.1201/9780429457791-13910.1201/9780429457791-139 ↗
12. 10.1201/9780429457791-14110.1201/9780429457791-141 ↗
13. Kutay, M.E.et al., 2017.Development of an acceptance test for chip seal projects, Michigan Department of Transportaion, Final Report No. SPR 1649.
14. 10.3141/2044-0810.3141/2044-08 ↗
15. Merritt, D.K., Chang, G.K., and Rutledge, J.L., 2015.Best practices for achieving and measuring pavement smoothness, a synthesis of state-of-practice, FHWA/LA.14/550.
16. 10.1061/JPEODX.000006810.1061/JPEODX.0000068 ↗
17. Praticò, F., 2011. Pay adjustment in construction engineeringed.^eds.International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering, Hong Kong.
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000054010.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000540 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.06110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.061 ↗
20. 10.1177/036119811875686810.1177/0361198118756868 ↗
21. Transit New Zealand (Tnz), 2005.Chipsealing in new zealand.
22. 10.1520/JTE2012005110.1520/JTE20120051 ↗