journal article·2026-05-01Open access

Vertical LLM for Coal Mining Equipment O&M Under Limited Fine-Tuning Data

Ruiyuan Zhang, Xiangang Cao, Hongwei Ma, Xusheng Xue, Yue Wu, Mian Mu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Due to the scarcity of high-quality, specialized datasets for coal mining equipment operation and maintenance (O&M) and the poor adaptability of large language models to domain-specific scenarios, the reliability of actual mining O&M cannot be guaranteed. To address this, this paper investigates the construction of vertical-domain large language models for coal mining equipment O&M scenarios under limited fine-tuning data. First, to tackle the lack of O&M scenario data, a safety-guided evolutionary self-instruction method (SafeEvol-Instruct), is developed by integrating Self-Instruction, Evol-Instruct, and Rule-Based Filtering. This approach achieves the unified fusion of scalable generation, deep evolution, and safety filtering on limited O&M data, resulting in the construction of scenario-specific datasets for system status assessment, equipment fault diagnosis, maintenance plan formulation, and preventive maintenance. Second, to account for the distinct characteristics of different O&M tasks, a hybrid fine-tuning strategy (SynergyLoRA) is proposed based on the Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct foundation model. This strategy incorporates middle-layer LoRA, top-layer LoRA, middle-layer IA3, Prompt Tuning, and Prefix Tuning to enable specialized training of vertical-domain models for each O&M scenario. Finally, the constructed Coal Mining Equipment O&M Large Language Model (CMEOM-LLM) is evaluated through ablation studies across various scenarios, validating the effectiveness of the proposed methods. Experimental results demonstrate that, in the system status assessment scenario, CMEOM-LLM achieves improvements of 4.9%, 1.5%, and 1.4% over the Qwen model in accuracy, recall, and F1-score, respectively. In the equipment fault diagnosis scenario, CMEOM-LLM outperforms Qwen by 7.4% in accuracy, with BLEU-4 and ROUGE-L scores increasing by 6.6% and 6.5%, respectively. In the maintenance plan formulation scenario, CMEOM-LLM surpasses ChatGLM with improvements of 6.6%, 6.5%, and 8.5% in ROUGE-L, BLEU-4, and human evaluation, respectively. In the preventive maintenance scenario, CMEOM-LLM achieves improvements of 7.1% and 8.9% over Qwen in ROUGE-L and BLEU-4, along with a 0.69-point increase in human evaluation scores. This paper provides an effective approach for knowledge management in coal mining equipment O&M.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Mining Techniques and Economics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China

Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Electromechanical Equipment Intelligent Monitoring, Xi’an 710054, China

Xi’an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710119, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. System engineering and key technologies research and practice of smart mine
2. Research on the architecture and key technologies of intelligent coal mining system
3. Application of full-text search engine in coal mine operation and maintenance system
4. Häußermann, T.M., Lehmann, J., Kolb, F., Rache, A., and Reichwald, J. (2025). UniTwin: Enabling Multi-Digital Twin Coordination for Modeling Distributed and Complex Systems. IoT, 6.10.3390/iot6040057 ↗
5. Underground video semantic extraction and description generation technology based on multimodal large model
6. Research status and application prospect of mining artificial intelligence large models technology
7. Galitsky, B., and Rybalov, A. (2026). Neuro-Symbolic Verification for Preventing LLM Hallucinations in Process Control. Processes, 14.10.3390/pr14020322 ↗
8. Kourani, H., Antonov, A., Berti, A., and van der Aalst, W.M. (2025). Knowledge-Driven Hallucination in Large Language Models: An Empirical Study on Process Modeling. arXiv.
9. Key technologies for application of coal mine domain large model based on LoRA fine-tuning and RAG fusion
10. Sun, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, C., and Han, Y. (2024). MIRA-ChatGLM: A Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Intelligent Risk Assessment in Coal Mining. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142412072 ↗
11. Language models cannot reliably distinguish belief from knowledge and fact10.1038/s42256-025-01113-8 ↗
12. Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x ↗
13. Virtual-physical interaction control method for intelligent cantilever roadheader driven by digital twin
14. Hierarchical classification and storage technology for multi-source heterogeneous data in coal mine AI applications
15. A Conceptual Design of Industrial Asset Maintenance System by Autonomous Agents Enhanced with ChatGPT
16. Jiang, W., and Hu, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Agent-Enabled Predictive Maintenance: Conceptual Proposal and Basic Framework. Computers, 14.10.3390/computers14080329 ↗
17. Lorente, Q., Villeneuve, E., Merlo, C., Boy, G.A., and Thermy, F. (2021). Development of a digital twin for collaborative decision-making, based on a multi-agent system: Application to prescriptive maintenance. INCOSE International Symposium, INCOSE. Virtual Event.10.1002/iis2.12875 ↗
18. Research review on life-cycle health management and intelligent maintenance of coal mining equipment
19. Wang, Y., Kordi, Y., Mishra, S., Liu, A., Smith, N.A., Khashabi, D., and Hajishirzi, H. (2023, January 9–14). Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.754 ↗
20. Xu, C., Sun, Q., Zheng, K., Geng, X., Zhao, P., Feng, J., Tao, C., and Jiang, D. (2023). Wizardlm: Empowering large language models to follow complex instructions. arXiv.
21. Zielosko, B., Stańczyk, U., and Jabloński, K. (2023). Filtering decision rules driven by sequential forward and backward selection of attributes: An illustrative example in stylometric domain. Proceedings of the 2023 18th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS), Warsaw, Poland, 17–20 September 2023, IEEE.10.15439/2023F7295 ↗
22. Zhou, T., Chen, Y., Cao, P., Liu, K., Zhao, J., and Liu, S. (2023). Oasis: Data curation and assessment system for pretraining of large language models. arXiv.
23. Yang, A., Yang, B., Zhang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Li, C., Liu, D., and Huang, F. (2024). Qwen2.5 Technical Report. arXiv.
24. Hui, B., Yang, J., Cui, Z., Yang, J., Liu, D., Zhang, L., Liu, T., Zhang, J., Yu, B., and Lu, K. (2024). Qwen2.5-coder technical report. arXiv.
25. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
26. Zhou, B., and Li, K. (2025). Fusing geoscience large language models and lightweight RAG for enhanced geological question answering. Geosciences, 15.10.3390/geosciences15100382 ↗
27. Construction of a mine accident knowledge graph based on Large Language Models
28. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models
29. Cao, X., Xu, W., Zhao, J., Duan, Y., and Yang, X. (2024). Research on large language model for coal mine equipment maintenance based on multi-source text. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14072946 ↗
30. Kim, K.-M., Lee, M., Won, H.-S., Kim, M.-J., Kim, Y., and Lee, S. (2023). Multi-stage prompt tuning for political perspective detection in low-resource settings. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13106252 ↗
31. Li, X.L., and Liang, P. (2021, January 5–6). Prefix-tuning: Optimizing continuous prompts for generation. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Online.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.353 ↗
32. Nwaiwu, S. (2025). Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for low-resource text classification: A comparative study of LoRA, IA3, and ReFT. Front. Big Data, 8.10.3389/fdata.2025.1677331 ↗
33. Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learning
34. Glm, T., Zeng, A., Xu, B., Wang, B., Zhang, C., Yin, D., Zhang, D., Rojas, D., Feng, G., and Zhao, H. (2024). Chatglm: A family of large language models from glm-130b to glm-4 all tools. arXiv.
35. Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., and Vaughan, A. (2024). The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv.
36. Lin, C.-Y. (2004, January 25–26). Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. Proceedings of the Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out (WAS 2004), Barcelona, Spain.
37. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., and Zhu, W.-J. (2002, January 6–12). Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.3115/1073083.1073135 ↗