journal article·2026-04-30Open access

Quantifying Emotional Responses to Traditional and Modern Architecture: The Case of US Federal Buildings

Alexandros A. Lavdas, Ann Sussman

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Current biometric tools, with facial expression analysis capabilities, enable us to more deeply examine affective correlates of exposure to architectural forms, especially when combined with eye-tracking and preference data. This study builds on earlier preference studies comparing seven pairs of traditional vs. modern civic buildings from the National Civic Art Society and an eye-tracking study with the same images from the Human Architecture and Planning Institute. It explores how metrics for engagement and positive emotional experience are correlated with exposure to traditional and modern forms. In agreement with other eye-tracking studies, as well as with the broader literature, the results indicate that traditional stimuli elicit positive affective responses, while modern stimuli result in negative responses across participants.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Color perception and design · Face Recognition and Perception

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Via Volta 21, 39100 Bolzano, Italy

The Human Architecture & Planning Institute, Inc., 43 Bradford St., Concord, MA 01742, USA

Department of Psychology, Webster University, Athens Campus, 9 Ipitou Street, 10557 Athens, Greece

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. Alexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order: The Phenomenon of Life, Center for Environmental Structure.
2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., and Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press.
3. Reduction of Physiological Stress Using Fractal Art and Architecture10.1162/leon.2006.39.3.245 ↗
4. Taylor, R.P., Spehar, B., Van Donkelaar, P., and Hagerhall, C.M. (2011). Perceptual and Physiological Responses to Jackson Pollock’s Fractals. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 5.10.3389/fnhum.2011.00060 ↗
5. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension10.1126/science.156.3775.636 ↗
6. Self-similarity and recursion as default modes in human cognition10.1016/j.cortex.2016.08.016 ↗
7. Fractal image perception provides novel insights into hierarchical cognition10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.064 ↗
8. The default-mode network represents aesthetic appeal that generalizes across visual domains10.1073/pnas.1902650116 ↗
9. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery10.1126/science.6143402 ↗
10. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis10.1021/es903183r ↗
11. Restorative Effects of Virtual Nature Settings10.1089/cyber.2009.0308 ↗
12. The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x ↗
13. Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012 ↗
14. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001 ↗
15. The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005 ↗
16. The Restorative Benefits of Nature—Toward an Integrative Framework10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 ↗
17. Neighborhood greenspace and health in a large urban center10.1038/srep11610 ↗
18. Green exercise in the UK countryside: Effects on health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning10.1080/09640560601156466 ↗
19. Environment and crime in the inner city—Does vegetation reduce crime?
20. Aggression and violence in the inner city—Effects of environment via mental fatigue10.1177/00139160121973124 ↗
21. Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation10.1073/pnas.1510459112 ↗
22. Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00317-2 ↗
23. Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305 ↗
24. A Scientific Basis for Creating Architectural Forms
25. Salingaros, N.A., and Mehaffy, M.W. (2006). A Theory of Architecture, Umbau-Verlag.
26. The laws of architecture from a physicist’s perspective10.4006/1.3029208 ↗
27. Salingaros, N. (2013). Unified Architectural Theory: Form, Language, Complexity: A Companion to Christopher Alexander’s “The Phenomenon of Life: The Nature of Order, Book 1”, Oregon Sustasis Foundation.
28. Beauty in Architecture: Not a Luxury—Only a Necessity
29. Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A Neuroscience of Architectural Experience10.1162/jocn_a_01146 ↗
30. Multiple pathways link urban green- and bluespace to mental health in young adults10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.004 ↗
31. Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequality10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61669-4 ↗
32. Cruz-Garza, J.G., Darfler, M., Rounds, J.D., Gao, E., and Kalantari, S. (2021). EEG-based Investigation of the Impact of Classroom Design on Cognitive Performance of Students. arXiv.10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104540 ↗
33. Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006 ↗
34. A neurocognitive study of the emotional impact of geometrical criteria of architectural space10.1080/00038628.2021.1940827 ↗
35. Can architectural design alter the physiological reaction to psychosocial stress? A virtual TSST experiment10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.034 ↗
36. Quantifying Human Experience in Architectural Spaces with Integrated Virtual Reality and Body Sensor Networks10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000812 ↗
37. 3M (2021, May 16). 3M Visual Attention Software 2020. Available online: https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/visual-attention-software-us/.
38. Human brain activation in response to visual stimulation with rural and urban scenery pictures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.025 ↗
39. Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture10.1073/pnas.1301227110 ↗
40. Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.008 ↗
41. The neuroaesthetics of architectural spaces10.1007/s10339-021-01043-4 ↗
42. Rosas, H.J., Sussman, A., Sekely, A.C., and Lavdas, A.A. (2023). Using Eye Tracking to Reveal Responses to the Built Environment and Its Constituents. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132112071 ↗
43. Sussman, A., and Hollander, J.B. (2021). Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment, Routledge. [2nd ed.].10.4324/9781003031543 ↗
44. NCAS (2023, August 01). Americans’ Preferred Architecture for Federal Buildings. Available online: https://www.civicart.org/americans-preferred-architecture-for-federal-buildings.
45. (2023, December 01). iMotions. Available online: https://imotions.com/.
46. Ekman, P., and Friesen, W.V. (1978). Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement, Consulting Psychologists Press.10.1037/t27734-000 ↗
47. An argument for basic emotions10.1080/02699939208411068 ↗
48. Universality Reconsidered: Diversity in Making Meaning of Facial Expressions10.1177/0963721417746794 ↗
49. Recognition of emotions through facial expression analysis10.46932/sfjdv2n2-076 ↗
50. (2026, February 01). theHapi. Available online: https://geneticsofdesign.com/.
51. Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses, Wiley.
52. Hildebrandt, A., Olderbak, S., and Wilhelm, O. (2015). Facial Emotion Expression, Individual Differences in. Int. Encycl. Soc. Behav. Sci., 667–675.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25008-3 ↗
53. “P < 0.05” Might Not Mean What You Think: American Statistical Association Clarifies P Values10.1093/jnci/djw194 ↗
54. Fractal Architecture Could Be Good for You10.1007/s00004-007-0045-y ↗
55. Investigations of Human EEG Response to Viewing Fractal Patterns10.1068/p5918 ↗
56. Discomfort from urban scenes: Metabolic consequences10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.003 ↗
57. Valentine, C., Steffert, T., Mitcheltree, H., and Steemers, K. (2024). Architectural Neuroimmunology: A Pilot Study Examining the Impact of Biophilic Architectural Design on Neuroinflammation. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14051292 ↗
58. Intelligence-Based Design: A Sustainable Foundation for Worldwide Architectural Education
59. Trump, D.J. (2020). Executive Order on Promoting Beautiful Federal Civic Architecture.
60. The Consequences of Personality Biases in Online Panels for Measuring Public Opinion10.1093/poq/nfaa026 ↗
61. Costa, P. (1992). Neo PI-R Professional Manual, Psychological Assessment Resources.
62. The five-factor model and the NEO inventories
63. Engagement with beauty: Appreciating natural, artistic, and moral beauty10.3200/JRLP.142.3.303-332 ↗
64. Westermann, J.-F., Schäfer, R., Nordmann, M., Richter, P., Müller, T., and Franz, M. (2024). Measuring facial mimicry: Affdex vs. EMG. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0290569 ↗
65. Yiew, K., Togher, L., Power, E., Brunner, M., and Rietdijk, R. (2023). Differentiating Use of Facial Expression between Individuals with and without Traumatic Brain Injury Using Affectiva Software: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20021169 ↗