A Comprehensive Review of Position and Movement Visual Monitoring Systems with an Emphasis on AI Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent systems for position and movement monitoring are increasingly enhanced by the integration of advanced AI techniques. Besides traditional analytical and algorithmic approaches, which are still applied in areas such as signal processing, sensor fusion, and kinematic modeling, there is a growing body of research that leverages AI-based methods to improve accuracy, robustness, and real-time decision-making capabilities. Artificial neural networks and deep learning methods are more and more often used for tasks such as predicting movement trajectories, detecting position anomalies, and approximating complex motion patterns. The main aim of this work is to provide the main contributions of the recent publications to the current state of the field. Key trends, challenges, and prospects for their future development are also highlighted. Initial statistical analysis was conducted based on responses to queries formulated for searching engines of leading online databases since 2006. Next, the retrieved articles from the last 6 years were subjected to a more detailed analysis. They were divided into thematic areas, including models for human pose estimation; systems for motion detection and tracking, with special attention to human movement; and, eventually, more specialized applications such as action recognition, autonomous driving, motion analysis, and surveillance. The architectures of the created models, the methods for parameter tuning or training, the input datasets used, and the result evaluation metrics were classified. Finally, some more general conclusions were drawn.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human Pose and Action Recognition · Hand Gesture Recognition Systems · Gait Recognition and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 31-864 Cracow, Poland
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Zheng, C., Wu, W., Chen, C., Yang, T., Zhu, S., Shen, J., Kehtarnavaz, N., and Shah, M. (2023). Deep Learning-Based Human Pose Estimation: A Survey. arXiv.10.1145/3603618 ↗
2. Comparing Human Pose Estimation through deep learning approaches: An overview10.1016/j.cviu.2025.104297 ↗
3. A survey on deep learning for 2D and 3D human pose estimation10.1007/s10462-025-11430-4 ↗
4. Human Pose Estimation Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review10.3390/make5040081 ↗
5. Zhang, Z., and Shin, S.Y. (2025). Two-Dimensional Human Pose Estimation with Deep Learning: A Review. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15137344 ↗
6. Review of models for estimating 3D human pose using deep learning10.7717/peerj-cs.2574 ↗
7. El Kaid, A., and Baïna, K. (2023). A Systematic Review of Recent Deep Learning Approaches for 3D Human Pose Estimation. J. Imaging, 9.10.20944/preprints202311.0197.v1 ↗
8. A survey on deep 3D human pose estimation10.1007/s10462-024-11019-3 ↗
9. Monocular 3D Human Pose Estimation for REBA Ergonomics: A Critical Review of Recent Advances
10. Human pose estimation and its application to action recognition: A survey10.1016/j.jvcir.2021.103055 ↗
11. Deep Learning-Based Pose Estimation in Providing Feedback for Physical Movement: A Review10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36589 ↗
12. A systematic review of computer vision-based human pose estimation for occupational safety10.1016/j.ergon.2026.103931 ↗
13. Xu, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Q., and Tao, D. (2023). ViTPose++: Vision Transformer for Generic Body Pose Estimation. arXiv.10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3330016 ↗
14. Liu, H., and Zheng, Q. (2024). Vitcc: A Vision Transformer Coordinate Classification Perspective for Human Pose Estimation. Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Intelligent Perception and Pattern Recognition, Association for Computing Machinery. IPPR ’24.10.1145/3700035.3700046 ↗
15. Liao, Z., Zhu, J., Wang, C., Hu, H., and Waslander, S.L. (2023). Multiple View Geometry Transformers for 3D Human Pose Estimation. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.00074 ↗
16. Lu, K., and Min, D. (2024). AiPE: A Novel Transformer-Based Pose Estimation Method. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13050967 ↗
17. From coarse to fine:Clip-cross hierarchical refinement network for 3D human pose estimation from monocular videos10.1016/j.patrec.2026.03.015 ↗
18. Dual-stream spatio-temporal GCN-transformer network for 3D human pose estimation10.1016/j.displa.2026.103429 ↗
19. DDCEFormer: Dual-domain cross enhanced transformer for 3D human pose estimation10.1016/j.neucom.2026.133333 ↗
20. MuRE: Multi-Relationship Encoder for 3D human pose estimation10.1016/j.cviu.2026.104707 ↗
21. SFTFormer: Human pose estimation with spatiotemporal fusion and structural enhancement10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132074 ↗
22. Hierarchical spectral-gated GCN-transformer for 3D human pose estimation10.1016/j.patrec.2026.01.027 ↗
23. Bazarevsky, V., Grishchenko, I., Raveendran, K., Zhu, T., Zhang, F., and Grundmann, M. (2020). BlazePose: On-device Real-time Body Pose tracking. arXiv.
24. Li, Q., Zhang, Z., Xiao, F., Zhang, F., and Bhanu, B. (2022). Dite-HRNet: Dynamic Lightweight High-Resolution Network for Human Pose Estimation. Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. IJCAI-2022.10.24963/ijcai.2022/153 ↗
25. Jiang, T., Lu, P., Zhang, L., Ma, N., Han, R., Lyu, C., Li, Y., and Chen, K. (2023). RTMPose: Real-Time Multi-Person Pose Estimation based on MMPose. arXiv.
26. Zhang, S., Qiang, B., Yang, X., Wei, X., Chen, R., and Chen, L. (2023). Human Pose Estimation via an Ultra-Lightweight Pose Distillation Network. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12122593 ↗
27. AGMamba: Monocular 3D human pose estimation with a spatio-temporal Mamba-AGCN network10.1016/j.image.2026.117535 ↗
28. Edriss, S., Romagnoli, C., Caprioli, L., Bonaiuto, V., Padua, E., and Annino, G. (2025). Commercial vision sensors and AI-based pose estimation frameworks for markerless motion analysis in sports and exercises: A mini review. Front. Physiol., 16.10.3389/fphys.2025.1649330 ↗
29. Image-free three-dimensional human pose estimation based on single-pixel imaging with extremely low sampling rate10.1016/j.optlaseng.2026.109715 ↗
30. Nakano, N., Sakura, T., Ueda, K., Omura, L., Kimura, A., Iino, Y., Fukashiro, S., and Yoshioka, S. (2020). Evaluation of 3D Markerless Motion Capture Accuracy Using OpenPose with Multiple Video Cameras. Front. Sport. Act. Living, 2.10.3389/fspor.2020.00050 ↗
31. Pavllo, D., Feichtenhofer, C., Grangier, D., and Auli, M. (2019). 3D human pose estimation in video with temporal convolutions and semi-supervised training. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00794 ↗
32. Dill, S., Ahmadi, A., Grimmer, M., Haufe, D., Rohr, M., Zhao, Y., Sharbafi, M., and Hoog Antink, C. (2024). Accuracy Evaluation of 3D Pose Reconstruction Algorithms Through Stereo Camera Information Fusion for Physical Exercises with MediaPipe Pose. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24237772 ↗
33. SARL: Structure-aware representation learning for 3D human pose estimation from point clouds10.1016/j.patcog.2026.113570 ↗
34. Vision-based motion capture for the gait analysis of neurodegenerative diseases: A review10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.04.029 ↗
35. Saber, A., Hosseini, M.M., Fateh, A., Fateh, M., and Abolghasemi, V. (2026). Lightweight Multi-Scale Framework for Human Pose and Action Classification. Sensors, 26.10.3390/s26041102 ↗
36. Shan, W., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Han, K., Wang, S., Ma, S., and Gao, W. (2023). Diffusion-Based 3D Human Pose Estimation with Multi-Hypothesis Aggregation. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.01356 ↗
37. NTU RGB+D 120: A Large-Scale Benchmark for 3D Human Activity Understanding10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2916873 ↗
38. Ci, H., Wang, C., Ma, X., and Wang, Y. (November, January 27). Optimizing Network Structure for 3D Human Pose Estimation. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00235 ↗
39. A real time action scoring system for movement analysis and feedback in physical therapy using human pose estimation10.1038/s41598-025-29062-7 ↗
40. Object Detection in Remote Sensing Images Using Deep Learning: From Theory to Applications in Intelligent Transportation Systems10.62411/faith.3048-3719-114 ↗
41. Alif, M.A.R. (2024). YOLOv11 for Vehicle Detection: Advancements, Performance, and Applications in Intelligent Transportation Systems. arXiv.
42. Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.Y., and Liao, H.Y.M. (2020). YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. arXiv.
43. Visual Object Recognition with 3D-Aware Features in KITTI Urban Scenes10.3390/s150409228 ↗
44. An effective object detection and tracking using automated image annotation with inception based faster R-CNN model
45. YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant—A Comprehensive Review of YOLO10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3378568 ↗
46. Wang, C.Y., Bochkovskiy, A., and Liao, H.Y.M. (2023, January 17–24). YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721 ↗
47. Yaseen, M. (2024). What Is YOLOv8: An In-Depth Exploration of the Internal Features of the Next-Generation Object Detector. arXiv.
48. Hidayatullah, P., Syakrani, N., Sholahuddin, M.R., Gelar, T., and Tubagus, R. (2025). YOLOv8 to YOLO11: A Comprehensive Architecture In-depth Comparative Review. arXiv.10.29207/resti.v10i2.6598 ↗
49. Khanam, R., and Hussain, M. (2024). YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements. arXiv.
50. A Review of Yolo Algorithm Developments10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.135 ↗
51. Tracking Objects as Points
52. Enhancing UAV Aerial Image Analysis: Integrating Advanced SAHI Techniques with Real-Time Detection Models on the VisDrone Dataset10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3363413 ↗
53. End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers
54. Zhu, X., Su, W., Lu, L., Li, B., Wang, X., and Dai, J. (2021). Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection. arXiv.
55. A Review of Multi-Object Tracking in Recent Times10.1049/cvi2.70010 ↗
56. Deep Learning in Video Multi-Object Tracking: A Survey10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.023 ↗
57. Multi-Object Tracking Review: Retrospective and Emerging Trend10.1007/s10462-025-11212-y ↗
58. ByteTrack: Multi-Object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Box
59. Wojke, N., Bewley, A., and Paulus, D. (2017, January 17–20). Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metric. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Beijing, China.10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296962 ↗
60. A new multi-object tracking algorithm based on Sparse Detection Transformer10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112666 ↗
61. Chained-Tracker: Chaining Paired Attentive Regression Results for End-to-End Joint Multiple-Object Detection and Tracking
62. Sun, P., Cao, J., Jiang, Y., Zhang, R., Xie, E., Yuan, Z., Wang, C., and Luo, P. (2021). TransTrack: Multiple Object Tracking with Transformer. arXiv.
63. MOTR: End-to-End Multiple-Object Tracking with Transformer
64. Zhou, X., Yin, T., Koltun, V., and Krähenbühl, P. (2022, January 18–24). Global Tracking Transformers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00857 ↗
65. A Review on Deep Learning-Based Object Tracking Methods10.3233/MGS-230126 ↗
66. Yin, T., Zhou, X., and Krähenbühl, P. (2021, January 20–25). Center-Based 3D Object Detection and Tracking. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01161 ↗
67. Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., and Caine, B. (2020, January 13–19). Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00252 ↗
68. Learning spatio-temporal representation for cooperative 3D object detection and tracking10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107626 ↗
69. Dendorfer, P., Rezatofighi, H., Milan, A., Shi, J., Cremers, D., Reid, I., Roth, S., Schindler, K., and Leal-Taixé, L. (2020). MOTChallenge: A Benchmark for Single-Camera Multiple Target Tracking. arXiv.10.1007/s11263-020-01393-0 ↗
70. Lang, A.H., Vora, S., Caesar, H., Zhou, L., Yang, J., and Beijbom, O. (2019, January 15–20). PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Clouds. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.01298 ↗
71. Shi, S., Wang, X., and Li, H. (2019, January 15–20). PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00086 ↗
72. Yang, Z., Sun, Y., Liu, S., Shen, X., and Jia, J. (November, January 27). STD: Sparse-to-Dense 3D Object Detector for Point Cloud. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
73. Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., and Darrell, T. (2020, January 13–19). BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00271 ↗
74. TAO: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tracking Any Object
75. Deep learning for object detection and scene perception in self-driving cars: Survey, challenges, and open issues10.1016/j.array.2021.100057 ↗
76. Berwo, M.A., Khan, A., Fang, Y., Fahim, H., Javaid, S., Mahmood, J., Abideen, Z.U., and M.S., S. (2023). Deep Learning Techniques for Vehicle Detection and Classification from Images/Videos: A Survey. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23104832 ↗
77. Three-dimensional object detection for autonomous driving via deep learning: A review10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112238 ↗
78. Innovative approaches in image-based 3D object detection for autonomous driving: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.dsp.2026.106016 ↗
79. Multivariate feature learning and associative spatial information enhancement for snow object detection in autonomous driving10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114672 ↗
80. Adaptive dual cross-attention network for multispectral object detection in autonomous driving10.1016/j.eswa.2026.132012 ↗
81. A dual-branch noise-resistant sparse convolution method for multi-modal 3D object detection in autonomous driving10.1016/j.asoc.2025.114252 ↗
82. SDF-YOLO: A multi-scale dynamic feature fusion network for enhanced lightweight object detection in autonomous driving10.1016/j.neucom.2026.133328 ↗
83. Advancing autonomous driving systems: A 3-dimensional U-Net framework for object detection via fusion of camera and LiDAR sensors10.1016/j.ins.2026.123215 ↗
84. Lightweight multi-scale dynamic feature focusing network integrating spatial channel attention mechanism for autonomous driving object detection10.1016/j.dsp.2025.105770 ↗
85. Geometry-guided multi-view 3D object detection for autonomous driving10.1016/j.knosys.2026.115901 ↗
86. Multimodal and view image processing for three-dimensional object detection in autonomous driving10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112921 ↗
87. Object detection algorithm for autonomous driving: Design and real-time performance analysis of AttenRetina model10.1016/j.aej.2025.02.063 ↗
88. LCF3D: A robust and real-time late-cascade fusion framework for 3D object detection in autonomous driving10.1016/j.patcog.2026.113046 ↗
89. SAMUNet: Enhancing pillar-based 3D object detection in autonomous driving with Shape-aware Mini-Unet10.1016/j.imavis.2025.105703 ↗
90. A Survey of Video Action Recognition Based on Deep Learning10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113594 ↗
91. Zhu, Y., Li, X., Liu, C., Zolfaghari, M., Xiong, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, Z., Tighe, J., Manmatha, R., and Li, M. (2020). A Comprehensive Study of Deep Video Action Recognition. arXiv.
92. Tang, Z., Zhao, Y., Wen, Y., and Liu, M. (2024). A Survey on Backbones for Deep Video Action Recognition. arXiv.10.1109/ICMEW63481.2024.10645423 ↗
93. Pham, H.H., Khoudour, L., Crouzil, A., Zegers, P., and Velastin, S.A. (2022). Video-based Human Action Recognition using Deep Learning: A Review. arXiv.
94. Spatio-temporal side tuning pre-trained foundation models for video-based pedestrian attribute recognition10.1016/j.cviu.2025.104588 ↗
95. Video-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Hybrid Deep Learning Model
96. Human activity recognition from UAV videos using a novel DMLC-CNN model10.1016/j.imavis.2023.104674 ↗
97. Feichtenhofer, C., Fan, H., Malik, J., and He, K. (2019). SlowFast Networks for Video Recognition. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00630 ↗
98. A survey: Object detection methods from CNN to transformer10.1007/s11042-022-13801-3 ↗
99. Computer vision and deep learning techniques for pedestrian detection and tracking: A survey10.1016/j.neucom.2018.01.092 ↗
100. A hyperparameter-free Scene-Motion Aware Cross Attention Network for video anomaly detection in surveillance10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130348 ↗