Research on Data-Driven Modeling of Solid Rocket Motor Plume Temperature Distribution with Physics Guidance
Source abstract
Abstract
Aiming at the problems of the large prediction error of model-driven algorithms and poor interpretability (even potential violation of physical laws) of pure data-driven algorithms in the prediction of aerospace vehicle plume characteristics, a physics mechanism-guided prediction algorithm for aerospace vehicle plume characteristics was proposed. Taking the long short-term memory (LSTM) network as the backbone, this algorithm constructed a hybrid physics–data model by embedding the prior knowledge of physical laws and empirical rules into the neural network, and designed a loss function combined with physical mechanisms to guide network training. The aerospace vehicle plume dataset was preprocessed through characteristic parameter extraction, extended physical parameter calculation, data splicing and sliding window operation, and the LSTM network structure was optimized by adjusting hyperparameters such as the number of hidden layers and neurons. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm achieves a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 31.89 and a Physical Inconsistency of 0.1723 on the test set, with MAE reduced by 14% and Physical Inconsistency reduced by 7.5% compared with traditional machine learning models such as Random Forest. Ablation experiments verify that the introduction of physical mechanisms can improve the prediction accuracy of the model by about 25%. This algorithm makes up for the defects of traditional prediction algorithms, has good generalization ability and physical consistency, and provides an effective method for the prediction of engine exhaust plume temperature distribution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiative Heat Transfer Studies · Combustion and flame dynamics · Fire dynamics and safety research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
Inner Mongolia Aerospace Power Machinery Testing Institute, Hohhot 010076, China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of Solid Rocket Motor Performance Based on Deep Learning and Ignition Experimental Data10.1109/TAES.2024.3401670 ↗
2. IR Signature Surrogate Model of Ground-Based Rocket Exhaust Plumes Based on Convolutional Neural Network10.1016/j.infrared.2025.106320 ↗
3. Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where We Are and What’s Next10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
4. Physics-Informed Machine Learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
5. Ren, Z., Zhou, S., Liu, D., and Liu, Q. (2025). Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Review of Methodological Evolution, Theoretical Foundations, and Interdisciplinary Frontiers toward Next-Generation Scientific Computing. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15148092 ↗
6. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) for Computational Solid Mechanics: Numerical Frameworks and Applications10.1016/j.tws.2024.112495 ↗
7. Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review on Applications in Anomaly Detection and Condition Monitoring10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124678 ↗
8. A Hybrid Time Series and Physics-Informed Machine Learning Framework to Predict Soil Water Content10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110105 ↗
9. Physics-Informed Machine Learning for System Reliability Analysis and Design with Partially Observed Information10.1016/j.ress.2024.110598 ↗
10. Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Review and Applications in Geotechnics and Geosciences10.1007/s11831-025-10244-5 ↗
11. Hall, T., and Rasheed, K. (2025). A Survey of Machine Learning Methods for Time Series Prediction. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15115957 ↗
12. Recurrent Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting: Current Status and Future Directions10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.06.008 ↗
13. Generalized Performance of LSTM in Time-Series Forecasting10.1080/08839514.2024.2377510 ↗
14. Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: A Survey10.1007/s13042-025-02560-w ↗
15. Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Model and Control Robots: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation10.1002/aisy.202300385 ↗
16. Madani, S.S., Shabeer, Y., Fowler, M., Panchal, S., Ziebert, C., Chaoui, H., and Allard, F. (2026). Physics-Informed Temperature Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Decomposition-Enhanced LSTM and BiLSTM Models. World Electr. Veh. J., 17.10.3390/wevj17010002 ↗
17. Deep Learning-Based Time Series Forecasting10.1007/s10462-024-10989-8 ↗
18. Data-Driven Thermal Error Prediction of Spindle with Mechanism-Reinforced Temperature Information10.1016/j.aei.2024.103005 ↗
19. A Comprehensive Review of Physics-Informed Deep Learning and Its Applications in Geoenergy Development10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2025.100087 ↗
20. Oblique and Rotation Double Random Forest10.1016/j.neunet.2022.06.012 ↗
21. Aminifar, A., Rabbi, F., Pun, K.I., and Lamo, Y. (2021). Privacy Preserving Distributed Extremely Randomized Trees. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ′21), Virtual Event, Republic of Korea, 22–26 March 2021, ACM.10.1145/3412841.3442110 ↗
22. Prospectivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Tungsten Polymetallogenic Mineral Resources in the Nanling Metallogenic Belt, South China: A Comparative Study of AdaBoost, GBDT, and XGBoost Algorithms10.1007/s11053-024-10321-9 ↗