Privacy-Preserving Cost-Efficient Smart Metering by Variational-Constraint Adversarial Reinforcement Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Smart metering of high-time-resolution energy data enables efficient power grid management. However, it also raises significant privacy concerns by revealing users’ consumption patterns. In this paper, a novel privacy-preserving idea is introduced by utilizing a rechargeable battery (RB) to reshape the smart meter readings to statistically align with random target readings, which are preset independently of the private user energy consumption data. For the long-term privacy-preserving and cost-efficient objectives, we formulate a sequential energy management unit (EMU) policy design as a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP), where the cost-efficient objective is optimized subject to the constraint on privacy preservation. We then develop a novel variational-constraint adversarial proximal policy optimization (VCA-PPO) algorithm to solve the CMDP without requiring prior knowledge of probabilistic models. Experimental results on a standard real-world dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and its superiority to the load-flatness benchmark method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Electricity Theft Detection Techniques · Smart Grid Energy Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
School of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of the development of Smart Grid technologies10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.011 ↗
2. Smart electricity meter data intelligence for future energy systems: A survey10.1109/TII.2015.2414355 ↗
3. Review of smart meter data analytics: Applications, methodologies, and challenges10.1109/TSG.2018.2818167 ↗
4. Privacy-aware smart metering: Progress and challenges10.1109/MSP.2018.2841410 ↗
5. Deep learning-based real-time building occupancy detection using AMI data10.1109/TSG.2020.2982351 ↗
6. Cuijpers, C., and Koops, B.J. (2012). Smart metering and privacy in Europe: Lessons from the Dutch case. European Data Protection: Coming of Age, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5170-5_12 ↗
7. Efthymiou, C., and Kalogridis, G. (2010). Smart grid privacy via anonymization of smart metering data. Proceedings of the 2010 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, IEEE.10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622050 ↗
8. Rottondi, C., Mauri, G., and Verticale, G. (2012). A data pseudonymization protocol for smart grids. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Online Conference on Green Communications (GreenCom), IEEE.10.1109/GreenCom.2012.6519618 ↗
9. Lee, S., Bong, J., Shin, S., and Shin, Y. (2014). A security mechanism of Smart Grid AMI network through smart device mutual authentication. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), IEEE.
10. Li, F., Luo, B., and Liu, P. (2010). Secure information aggregation for smart grids using homomorphic encryption. Proceedings of the 2010 1st IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, IEEE.10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622064 ↗
11. Privacy-preserving data aggregation in smart metering systems: An overview10.1109/MSP.2012.2228343 ↗
12. Efficient privacy-preserving cube-data aggregation scheme for smart grids10.1109/TIFS.2017.2656475 ↗
13. A privacy-preserving homomorphic scheme with multiple dimensions and fault tolerance for metering data aggregation in smart grid10.1109/TSG.2021.3049222 ↗
14. Jawurek, M., Johns, M., and Rieck, K. (2011). Smart metering de-pseudonymization. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, ACM.10.1145/2076732.2076764 ↗
15. Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy. Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, Springer.10.1007/11787006_1 ↗
16. Differential Privacy for Class-Based Data: A Practical Gaussian Mechanism10.1109/TIFS.2023.3289128 ↗
17. Preserving privacy of smart meter data in a smart grid environment10.1109/TII.2021.3074915 ↗
18. Zhao, J., Jung, T., Wang, Y., and Li, X. (2014). Achieving differential privacy of data disclosure in the smart grid. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE.10.1109/INFOCOM.2014.6847974 ↗
19. Evaluation of the precision-privacy tradeoff of data perturbation for smart metering10.1109/TSG.2014.2387848 ↗
20. Smart meter privacy: A theoretical framework10.1109/TSG.2012.2211046 ↗
21. Cost-friendly differential privacy for smart meters: Exploiting the dual roles of the noise
22. Privacy-cost trade-offs in demand-side management with storage10.1109/TIFS.2017.2656469 ↗
23. Smart meter privacy with renewable energy and an energy storage device10.1109/TIFS.2017.2744601 ↗
24. Information-theoretic privacy for smart metering systems with a rechargeable battery10.1109/TIT.2018.2809005 ↗
25. Privacy-cost management in smart meters with mutual-information-based reinforcement learning10.1109/JIOT.2021.3128488 ↗
26. Cost-effective and privacy-preserving energy management for smart meters10.1109/TSG.2014.2343611 ↗
27. Shateri, M., Messina, F., Piantanida, P., and Labeau, F. (2020). Privacy-cost management in smart meters using deep reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe, IEEE.10.1109/ISGT-Europe47291.2020.9248831 ↗
28. Giaconi, G., Gündüz, D., and Poor, H.V. (2017). Optimal demand-side management for joint privacy-cost optimization with energy storage. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, IEEE.10.1109/SmartGridComm.2017.8340681 ↗
29. Smart meter privacy: Exploiting the potential of household energy storage units10.1109/JIOT.2017.2771370 ↗
30. Energy management strategy for smart meter privacy and cost saving10.1109/TIFS.2020.3036247 ↗
31. Adversarial Inference Control in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Bayesian Approach with Application to Smart Meters10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365270 ↗
32. Transfer learning for non-intrusive load monitoring
33. DeepDFML-NILM: A new CNN-based architecture for detection, feature extraction and multi-label classification in NILM signals
34. Multilabel appliance classification with weakly labeled data for non-intrusive load monitoring10.1109/TSG.2022.3191908 ↗
35. Non-intrusive load monitoring method for multi-energy coupling appliances considering spatio-temporal coupling10.1109/TSG.2023.3248679 ↗
36. Altman, E. (2021). Constrained Markov Decision Processes, Routledge.10.1201/9781315140223 ↗
37. On information and sufficiency10.1214/aoms/1177729694 ↗
38. Mescheder, L., Nowozin, S., and Geiger, A. (2017). Adversarial variational Bayes: Unifying variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, JMLR.
39. A comprehensive survey on safe reinforcement learning
40. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., and Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv.
41. Tessler, C., Mankowitz, D.J., and Mannor, S. (2018). Reward constrained policy optimization. arXiv.
42. Liu, B., Cai, Q., Yang, Z., and Wang, Z. (2019). Neural trust region/proximal policy optimization attains globally optimal policy. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019, Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation.
43. Beckel, C., Kleiminger, W., Cicchetti, R., Staake, T., and Santini, S. (2014). The ECO data set and the performance of non-intrusive load monitoring algorithms. Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Systems for Energy-efficient Buildings, ACM.10.1145/2674061.2674064 ↗
44. Yang, L., Ting, K., and Srivastava, M.B. (2014). Inferring occupancy from opportunistically available sensor data. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), IEEE.10.1109/PerCom.2014.6813945 ↗
45. LSTM: A search space odyssey10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924 ↗
46. Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., and Smith, A. (2006). Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. Proceedings of the Theory of Cryptography Conference, Springer.10.1007/11681878_14 ↗