journal article·2022-07-03

An efficient and robust method for predicting asphalt concrete dynamic modulus

Hongren Gong, Yiren Sun, Yuanshuai Dong, Wei Hu, Bingye Han, Pawel Polaczyk, Baoshan Huang

Publisher page

Abstract

This study developed gradient decision tree boosting (GDTB) models to estimate dynamic moduli (|E∗|) of hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. The GDTB used as input the binder properties, mixture volumetric, and aggregate gradation of the mixtures. The data used for training the GDTB were extracted from a report of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) project 9-19 [Witczak, M., 2006. Simple performance tests: summary of recommended methods and database. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, No. 547 in NCHRP Report.]. Totally, 7400 records of data for 346 mixtures were involved, among which 6700 were randomly chosen for training, 200 for validation, and 500 for testing. Comparative analyses were conducted among the GDTB, the two Witczak's equations, and two neural networks (NNs). This study emphasized both the predictive accuracy and computation efficiency of the models. The results indicated that the GDTB achieved predictive accuracy that was significantly higher than the Witczak's models and was in parallel to the more complex NNs. Compared to the Witczak's equations, for the viscosity-based model, the GDTB increased the coefficients of determination (R2) by 51.5% (arithmetic) and 11.5% (logarithmic), respectively; for the |G∗| based model, it respectively increased the R2 by 22.5% (arithmetic) and 8% (logarithmic). Besides the enhanced predictive accuracy, the GDTB only marginally increased the computing time comparing with the empirical equations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Jiading District, Shanghai, China

School of Transportation and Logistics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

China Highway Engineering Consultants Corporation, Haidian District, Beijing, China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Khateeb, G. et al., 2006. A new simplistic model for dynamic modulus predictions of asphalt paving mixtures. In: Journal of the association of asphalt paving technologists, Sharjah, UAE. Vol. 75, 1254–1293.
2. Andrei, D., Witczak, M., and Mirza, M., 1999. Development of a revised predictive model for the dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Interim Report NCHRP 1-37A.
3. ARA, 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Champaign, Illinois: ARA, Inc. ERES Consultants Devision, Final Report NCHRP 01-37A.
4. Bari, J., and Witczak, M., 2006. Development of a new revised version of the witczak e* predictive model for hot mix asphalt mixtures (with discussion). In: Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Savannah, Georgia. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT), vol. 75, 381–423.
5. 10.1177/036119811882351810.1177/0361198118823518 ↗
6. Bergstra J. · Journal of Machine Learning Research · 2012 · 13 · 281
7. 10.1177/036119810519290012410.1177/0361198105192900124 ↗
8. Bishop C.M. · 2006
9. Breiman L. · 1984
10. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(286)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(286) ↗
12. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C., 2016. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD '16, San Francisco, California, USA: ACM Press, 785–794. 02444.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
13. Chollet, F. et al., 2015. Keras. https://github.com/fchollet/keras.
14. 10.1080/14680629.2015.107763510.1080/14680629.2015.1077635 ↗
15. Christensen D.W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2003 · 72 · 97
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000006210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000062 ↗
17. 10.1080/10298436.2020.174158710.1080/10298436.2020.1741587 ↗
18. Dongre, R. et al., 2005. Field evaluation of witczak and hirsch models for predicting dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt (with discussion). In: Journal of the association of asphalt paving technologists, Long Beach CA, United States: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT), vol. 74, 381–442.
19. El-Badawy S. · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2018 · 3010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002282 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000051810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000518 ↗
21. El-Badawy, S.M., Khattab, A.M., and Al Hazmi, A.A., 2016. Using artificial neural networks (anns) for hot mix asphalt e* predictions. In: Geo-china 2016, Shanghai, China. 83–91.10.1061/9780784480076.010 ↗
22. 10.3141/2127-2010.3141/2127-20 ↗
23. 10.1006/jcss.1997.150410.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-210.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
25. 10.3390/infrastructures403005310.3390/infrastructures4030053 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000289210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002892 ↗
27. 10.1080/10298436.2019.163073810.1080/10298436.2019.1630738 ↗
28. Gong H. · Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements · 2019 · 145
29. Goodfellow I. · 2016
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000021410.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000214 ↗
31. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J.H., 2009. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. Springer Series in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
32. He, K. et al., 2015. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), December, Santiago, Chile: IEEE, 1026–1034.10.1109/ICCV.2015.123 ↗
33. 10.1038/nprot.2009.18210.1038/nprot.2009.182 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.066 ↗
35. Khattab, A.M. et al., 2017. Comparison of witczak nchrp 1-40d & hirsh dynamic modulus models based on different binder characterization methods: a case study. In: MATEC web of conferences. Sharjah, UAE: EDP Sciences, vol. 120, 07003.10.1051/matecconf/201712007003 ↗
36. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J., 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
37. Kluyver, T. et al., 2016. Jupyter notebooks-a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In: ELPUB. Göttingen, Germany: IOS Press, 87–90.
38. 10.1016/j.compind.2018.03.02610.1016/j.compind.2018.03.026 ↗
39. Liu J. · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2018 · 3010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002242 ↗
40. McCullough B.D. · Computational Statistics · 1999 · 31 · 27
41. Mohammad, L.N. et al., 2005. A Practical look at the simple performance tests: Louisiana's experience (with discussion). In: Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Long Beach CA, United States: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT), vol. 74, 557–600.
42. 10.3141/2181-1010.3141/2181-10 ↗
43. Schwartz, C.W., 2005. Evaluation of the Witczak dynamic modulus prediction model. In: Proceedings of the 84th annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC, no. 05–2112, 1–37.
44. Shook, J.F. et al., 1969. Factors influencing dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete. In: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc, February. Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists. Vol. 38, 140–178.
45. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969019810.1080/14680629.2009.9690198 ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000054810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000548 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.05510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.055 ↗
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.000023910.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000239 ↗
49. Witczak, M., 2006. Simple performance tests: summary of recommended methods and database. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, No. 547 in NCHRP Report.
50. 10.1177/036119819615400010310.1177/0361198196154000103 ↗
51. Witzcak, M.W., ed. 2002. Simple performance test for Superpave mix design. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, No. 465 in NCHRP Report, OCLC: ocm49686914.
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000001410.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000014 ↗
53. Yousefdoost, S. et al., 2013. Evaluation of dynamic modulus predictive models for typical australian asphalt mixes. In: 15th International Flexible Pavements Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 1–18.
54. Yu, J., Williams, R.C., and Cascione, A., 2013. Evaluation of dynamic modulus predictive models for asphalt mixtures containing recycled asphalt shingles. In: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 1–16.