journal article·2026-04-27Open access

An RL-Guided Hybrid Forecasting Framework for Aircraft Engine RUL and Performance Emission Prediction

Ukbe Üsame Uçar, Hakan Aygün

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

In this paper, a new hybrid prediction method is proposed for estimating remaining useful life, emissions, and performance parameters using experimental data obtained from a micro-turbojet engine. Experiments were conducted under various rotational speed conditions, yielding a total of 342 measurement points. Turbine speed, exhaust gas temperature, fuel flow rate, and thrust were considered as input variables in the study. Thermal efficiency, total power, CO2, and NO2 were considered as output variables. The experimental findings showed that thermal efficiency varied between 0.49% and 7.1%, total power between 0.266 and 13.94 kW, and CO2 emissions by volume between 0.317% and 2.183%. The proposed RL-MH-LR-CBR approach combines the advantages of multiple methods. In this method, the interpretable formulation of linear regression serves as the foundation. Additionally, in the adaptive meta-heuristic optimization process, a hyper-heuristic selection mechanism based on the UCB1-based multi-arm bandit approach is used to select the optimal algorithm from among the meta-heuristic methods. Finally, the CatBoost-based residual error learning component aims to capture non-linear patterns that cannot be explained by the linear model. The method was compared with 14 different methods on both the NASA C-MAPSS FD001 dataset and real engine data. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework exhibits more balanced, stable, and higher generalization capabilities compared to classical regression models and powerful AI methods, particularly in non-linear, noisy, and heterogeneous outputs. In the real engine dataset, the proposed method produced R2 values of 0.968 for CO2 and 0.936 for NO2, while the predictive performance was even stronger for thermal efficiency and total power, with corresponding R2 values of 0.998 and 0.995, respectively. Additionally, the method demonstrated a clear advantage in hard-to-model outputs by reducing the error level to 0.061 in NO2 predictions. These findings demonstrate that the proposed approach is not limited to micro-turbojet-engines. The developed method provides a robust decision support framework that is applicable, scalable, and generalizable to predictive maintenance, emissions monitoring, energy systems, aviation analytics, and other highly dynamic engineering problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies · Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aircraft Air Frame and Power Plant, Fırat University, 23119 Elâzığ, Türkiye

Funding

Fırat University

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Shehata, A.M., and Schoen, M.P. (2025). Comprehensive Survey of Micro Turbojet Experimentation: Sensor Technologies, Methodologies, and Research Trends. Machines, 13.10.3390/machines13110989 ↗
2. Comprehensive analysis of particle emissions from miniature turbojet engine10.19206/CE-192421 ↗
3. Cican, G. (2024). Experimental Transient Process Analysis of Micro-Turbojet Aviation Engines: Comparing the Effects of Diesel and Kerosene Fuels at Different Ambient Temperatures. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17061366 ↗
4. Performance and emission characteristic of miniature turbojet engine FED Jet A-1/alcohol blend
5. Impact of additives in Jet-A fuel blends on combustion, emission and exergetic analysis using a micro-gas turbine engine10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118104 ↗
6. Impact of microalgae biofuel on microgas turbine aviation engine: A combustion and emission study10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121155 ↗
7. Thrust and emission performance of grapeseed biojet in jet engines10.1108/AEAT-03-2025-0097 ↗
8. Xu, Z., Wang, M., Li, G., Hu, X., Yang, P., Zhu, M., Zhang, B., Chang, L., and Chen, L. (2024). Experimental Investigation of Particulate Number Measurement Methodology for Micro-Turbojet Engine Emissions. Aerospace, 11.10.3390/aerospace11070548 ↗
9. Przysowa, R., Gawron, B., Białecki, T., Łęgowik, A., Merkisz, J., and Jasiński, R. (2021). Performance and Emissions of a Microturbine and Turbofan Powered by Alternative Fuels. Aerospace, 8.10.3390/aerospace8020025 ↗
10. The effect of using triple bio-fuel blend with Jet-A on engine performance and emissions in mini-scale turbojet engine
11. Cican, G., Silivestru, V., Mirea, R., Osman, S., Popescu, F., Sapunaru, O.V., and Ene, R. (2025). Performance and Emissions Assessment of a Micro-Turbojet Engine Fueled with Jet A and Blends of Propanol, Butanol, Pentanol, Hexanol, Heptanol, and Octanol. Fire, 8.10.3390/fire8040150 ↗
12. Lee, D., Chung, H., Kang, Y.S., and Rhee, D.-H. (2024). A Study of an Integrated Analysis Model with Secondary Flow for Assessing the Performance of a Micro Turbojet Engine. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14177606 ↗
13. Advanced Prognostic Health Management of Turbofan Engines: A Comprehensive Machine Learning Framework Using Real Flight Data10.1007/s42405-025-00957-z ↗
14. Optimizing Gas Turbine Engine Thrust Predictions for UAV Propulsion System Using Regularized Regression Techniques10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-6356 ↗
15. (2026, April 14). JetCat P-80 Engine Specifications. Available online: https://www.jetcat.de/en/productdetails/produkte/jetcat/produkte/Eingestellte%2520Produkte%2520Zubehoer/p80_se.
16. El-Sayed, A.F. (2017). Aircraft Propulsion and Gas Turbine Engines, CRC Press.
17. Loess: A nonparametric, graphical tool for depicting relationships between variables10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00028-1 ↗
18. The benefits of continuous local regression for quantifying global warming10.1029/2020EA001082 ↗
19. Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., and Vining, G.G. (2021). Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons.
20. Huber, P.J. (1992). Robust estimation of a location parameter. Breakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_35 ↗
21. Modelling using polynomial regression10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.545 ↗
22. Moment conditions for the quadratic regression model with measurement error10.1080/07474938.2022.2052666 ↗
23. Khan, M., and Srivastava, K. (2020, January 17–19). Regression model for better generalization and regression analysis. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing, Haiphong City, Vietnam.10.1145/3380688.3380691 ↗
24. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 ↗
25. Generalized additive models
26. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x ↗
27. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
28. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
29. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
30. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree
31. CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features
32. Optimization by simulated annealing10.1126/science.220.4598.671 ↗
33. Sastry, K., Goldberg, D.E., and Kendall, G. (2013). Genetic algorithms. Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-6940-7_4 ↗
34. Yang, X.S. (2010). A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2010), Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6 ↗
35. Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028 ↗
36. Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem10.1023/A:1013689704352 ↗
37. Parameter setting of meta-heuristic algorithms: A new hybrid method based on DEA and RSM10.1007/s11356-021-17364-y ↗
38. Multi-armed bandit-based hyper-heuristics for combinatorial optimization problems10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.016 ↗
39. A review of reinforcement learning based hyper-heuristics10.7717/peerj-cs.2141 ↗
40. Zhang, J., and Lyu, L. (2025). An Actor–Critic-Based Hyper-Heuristic Autonomous Task Planning Algorithm for Supporting Spacecraft Adaptive Space Scientific Exploration. Aerospace, 12.10.3390/aerospace12050379 ↗
41. Hybrid algorithms based on combining reinforcement learning and metaheuristic methods to solve global optimization problems10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107044 ↗
42. de Carvalho, V.R., Özcan, E., and Sichman, J.S. (2021). Comparative analysis of selection hyper-heuristics for real-world multi-objective optimization problems. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11199153 ↗
43. Hybrid metaheuristic optimized Catboost models for construction cost estimation of concrete solid slabs10.1038/s41598-025-06380-4 ↗
44. Interpretable wind power forecasting with residual learning-based model10.1016/j.epsr.2025.111824 ↗
45. Guan, X., Xue, R., He, Z., Chen, S., and Chen, X. (2025). Catboost-optimized hyperspectral modeling for accurate prediction of wood dyeing formulations. Forests, 16.10.3390/f16081279 ↗
46. Exploiting residual errors in nonlinear online prediction10.1007/s10994-024-06554-7 ↗
47. A hybrid Long-term photovoltaic power prediction model integrating a BiLSTM network with residual correction via CatBoost
48. (2026, April 14). NASA Open Data Portal, Available online: https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/cmapss-jet-engine-simulated-data.
49. Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., and Eklund, N. (2008, January 6–9). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, Denver, CO, USA.10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414 ↗
50. Xu, K., Guo, Y., and Zhou, Q. (2025). Research on the Remaining Useful Life Prediction Algorithm for Aero-Engines Based on Transformer–KAN–BiLSTM. Aerospace, 12.10.3390/aerospace12110998 ↗
51. Remaining useful life prediction with uncertainty quantification using evidential deep learning10.2478/jaiscr-2025-0003 ↗
52. Deniz, M. (2025). Enhancing Aircraft Safety through Predictive Monitoring of Engine Health. Ege Üniversitesi Ulaştırma Yönetimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Ege University. 2(Aviation Technologies and Applications Conference (ATAConf’25) Special Issue).
53. Wang, H., Li, D., Li, D., Liu, C., Yang, X., and Zhu, G. (2023). Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft turbofan engine based on random forest feature selection and multi-layer perceptron. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127186 ↗
54. Aircraft engines remaining useful life prediction based on a hybrid model of autoencoder and deep belief network10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3188681 ↗
55. Anomaly monitoring improves remaining useful life estimation of industrial machinery10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.014 ↗