Small-Data Neural Computing Outperforms RSM: Low-Cost Smart Optimization in Injection Molding
Source abstract
Abstract
In smart manufacturing, the injection molding industry faces a “data scarce environment” due to prohibitive physical trial costs. Processing recycled polypropylene (rPP) exacerbates this challenge, as traditional response surface methodology (RSM) fails to capture complex non-linear rheological behaviors induced by material variability. This study proposes a “domain-knowledge guided data augmentation framework,” integrating Taguchi experimental data (L25) with Moldex3D digital twin simulations to construct a 300-sample hybrid dataset. A back-propagation neural network (BPNN) with L2 regularization was employed for small-sample learning, providing a continuous differentiable physical mapping. To rigorously prevent neighborhood data leakage, the model was evaluated via a strict nested group-based 5-fold cross-validation. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) was coupled to overcome the local minima of gradient descent. Comparative analysis demonstrates that BPNN significantly outperforms both traditional RSM and a newly introduced Random Forest (RF) baseline, achieving a testing mean squared error (MSE) of 0.001 (±0.0002) and a testing R2 of 0.95. PSO minimized the shrinkage rate to 3.079%, validated via Moldex3D digital twin simulation with a 0.19% relative error. Synergizing virtual–physical integration with robust neural computing enables superior process control precision in small-data regimes, offering small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) a cost-effective pathway for smart optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Injection Molding Process and Properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Management, Chung Hua University, Hsinchu 30012, Taiwan
Ph.D. Program of Management, Chung Hua University, Hsinchu 30012, Taiwan
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Smart Manufacturing10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644 ↗
2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
3. Hu, Y., Liao, Y., Zheng, Y., Ikeda, K., Okabe, R., Wu, R., Ozaki, R., Xu, J., and Xu, Q. (2022). Influence of Cooling Rate on Crystallization Behavior of Semi-Crystalline Polypropylene: Experiments and Mathematical Modeling. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14173646 ↗
4. Recent Progress in Minimizing the Warpage and Shrinkage Deformations by the Optimization of Process Parameters in Plastic Injection Molding: A Review10.1007/s00170-022-08859-0 ↗
5. Application of the Digital Twin for In-Process Monitoring of the Micro Injection Moulding Process Quality10.1016/j.compind.2021.103568 ↗
6. Saeidi Aminabadi, S., Jafari-Tabrizi, A., Gruber, D.P., Berger-Weber, G., and Friesenbichler, W. (2022). An Automatic, Contactless, High-Precision, High-Speed Measurement System to Provide In-Line, As-Molded Three-Dimensional Measurements of a Curved-Shape Injection-Molded Part. Technologies, 10.10.3390/technologies10040095 ↗
7. Enhancing Properties and Manufacturability of Post-Consumer Recycled Polypropylene via Gas Counter-Pressure Injection Molding
8. Mollaei Ardestani, A., Azamirad, G., Shokrollahi, Y., Calaon, M., Hattel, J.H., Kulahci, M., Soltani, R., and Tosello, G. (2023). Application of Machine Learning for Prediction and Process Optimization—Case Study of Blush Defect in Plastic Injection Molding. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042617 ↗
9. Kennedy, P., and Zheng, R. (2012). Flow Analysis of Injection Molds, Hanser Publications. [2nd ed.].10.3139/9781569905227.fm ↗
10. Multiple Objectives Optimization of Injection-Moulding Process for Dashboard Using Soft Computing and Particle Swarm Optimization10.1038/s41598-024-62618-7 ↗
11. Gámez, J.L., Jordá-Vilaplana, A., Peydro, M.A., Selles, M.A., and Sanchez-Caballero, S. (2025). Predictive ANN Modeling and Optimization of Injection Molding Parameters to Minimize Warpage in Polypropylene Rectangular Parts. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 9.10.3390/jmmp9070236 ↗
12. Rottenwalter, G., Tilly, M., and Owolabi, V. (2025). Improving Industrial Injection Molding Processes with Explainable AI for Quality Classification. Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE 9th Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI), Singapore, 18–21 December 2025, IEEE.10.1109/RTSI64020.2025.11212395 ↗
13. A Multiphase Dual Attention-Based LSTM Neural Network for Industrial Product Quality Prediction10.1109/TII.2024.3383054 ↗
14. Deep Learning for Smart Manufacturing: Methods and Applications10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003 ↗
15. Modeling and Optimization of the Injection-Molding Process: A Review10.1002/adv.21683 ↗
16. Narowski, P., and Wilczyński, K. (2024). A Global Approach to Modeling Injection Molding. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16010147 ↗
17. Reducing Shrinkage in Injection Moldings via the Taguchi, ANOVA and Neural Network Methods10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.049 ↗
18. Ke, K.-C., and Huang, M.-S. (2020). Quality Prediction for Injection Molding by Using a Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12081812 ↗