journal article·2026-04-25Open access

Research on Core Factor Sets for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Interpretable Machine Learning Methods

Xianyu Yu, Haixiang Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Landslides are one of the most common natural hazards in China, and the efficient screening of important factors is crucial for landslide susceptibility mapping. Taking the Zigui–Badong section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) as the study area, this research initially selected 25 evaluation factors based on topography, geology, hydrology, remote sensing images, and previous studies. Thirteen key factors were obtained through analysis. Three machine learning models—RF, DT, and XGBoost—were then used for landslide susceptibility mapping, with SHAP and LIME employed to interpret the models. Finally, a scoring method was used to rank the six sets of results and compare them with those from the traditional AUC-based Recursive Feature Elimination (AUC-RFE) method. The results showed that the core factor sets screened by interpretable methods outperformed those from AUC-RFE. To further obtain accurate core factor sets, two additional interpretable methods—PI and Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM)—were integrated, ultimately identifying a core factor set consisting of eight factors including Elevation, Slope Height, and Aspect. This set achieved an AUC value of 0.931, only 0.003 lower than that of the 13 filtered factors. The screening method proposed in this paper can significantly improve the efficiency of factor acquisition, reduce the difficulty of factor acquisition, and provide a new approach for the selection of key factors in landslide susceptibility assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China

Key Laboratory of Intelligent Sensing for Lake and River Health and Ecological Restoration, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430068, China

International Joint Research Base for Eco-Environmental Geotechnics and Lake-River Ecological Restoration, Wuhan 430068, China

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. New method for landslide susceptibility evaluation in alpine valley regions that considers the suitability of InSAR monitoring and introduces deformation rate grading10.1080/10095020.2023.2270218 ↗
2. Landslide–Anthropogenic Interactions in Urban Areas: A Multidisciplinary Case Study from Taounate, Morocco10.1007/s10706-025-03204-0 ↗
3. Deep learning can predict global earthquake-triggered landslides10.1093/nsr/nwaf179 ↗
4. Optimized landslide susceptibility mapping and modelling using PS-InSAR technique: A case study of Chitral valley, Northern Pakistan10.1080/10106049.2021.1914750 ↗
5. Xia, L., Shen, J., Zhang, T., Dang, G., and Wang, T. (2023). GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling using data mining techniques. Front. Earth Sci., 11.10.3389/feart.2023.1187384 ↗
6. Assessing the importance of conditioning factor selection in landslide susceptibility for the province of Belluno (region of Veneto, northeastern Italy)10.5194/nhess-22-1395-2022 ↗
7. Kincal, C., and Kayhan, H. (2022). A Combined Method for Preparation of Landslide Susceptibility Map in Izmir (Türkiye). Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12189029 ↗
8. Landslide hazard assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study of National Highway 5 in India10.1016/j.asej.2021.10.021 ↗
9. Landslide susceptibility prediction and mapping in Loess Plateau based on different machine learning algorithms by hybrid factors screening: Case study of Xunyi County, Shaanxi Province, China10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.074 ↗
10. Zhou, J., Tan, S., Li, J., Xu, J., Wang, C., and Ye, H. (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): A Case Study of a Construction Site for Photovoltaic Power Generation in Yunxian County, Southwest China. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15065281 ↗
11. Landslide susceptibility assessment using hybrid geospatial, frequency ratio, and AHP models in Souk Ahras province, Northeastern of Algeria10.1038/s41598-025-32062-2 ↗
12. FR-weighted GeoDetector for landslide susceptibility and driving factors analysis10.1080/19475705.2023.2205001 ↗
13. Yu, L., and Wang, Y. (2024). Pradhan B Enhancing landslide susceptibility mapping incorporating landslide typology via stacking ensemble machine learning in Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Geosci. Front., 15.10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101802 ↗
14. Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Yu, X., and Liu, C. (2025). Landslide susceptibility assessment via the information value-coupled machine learning models. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0333055 ↗
15. Can, R., Kocaman, S., and Gokceoglu, C. (2021). A Comprehensive Assessment of XGBoost Algorithm for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Upper Basin of Ataturk Dam, Turkey. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11114993 ↗
16. Hussain, M.A., Chen, Z., Zheng, Y., Zhou, Y., and Daud, H. (2023). Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15194703 ↗
17. Sun, D., Gu, Q., Wen, H., Shi, S., Mi, C., and Zhang, F. (2022). A Hybrid Landslide Warning Model Coupling Susceptibility Zoning and Precipitation. Forests, 13.10.3390/f13060827 ↗
18. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should i trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining-KDD’16, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 August 2016, ACM Press.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
19. Yan, X., Zhang, D., Han, Y., Li, T., Zhong, P., Ning, Z., and Tan, S. (2025). Developing a Hybrid Model to Enhance the Robustness of Interpretability for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 14.10.3390/ijgi14070277 ↗
20. Developing a hybrid deep learning model with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for enhanced landslide susceptibility modeling and management10.1007/s11069-023-06357-4 ↗
21. Bostan, T. (2024). Generating a Landslide Susceptibility Map Using Integrated Meta-Heuristic Optimization and Machine Learning Models. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16219396 ↗
22. Exploring the decision-making process of ensemble learning algorithms in landslide susceptibility mapping: Insights from local and global explainable AI analyses10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.082 ↗
23. Dynamic landslide susceptibility mapping on time-series InSAR and explainable machine learning: A case study at Wushan in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China10.1016/j.asr.2025.03.067 ↗
24. The impact of different sampling strategies on landslide susceptibility assessment: An explainable hybrid BO-XGBoost model10.1007/s12145-025-01931-9 ↗
25. Le, X.H., Choi, C., Eu, S., Yeon, M., and Lee, G. (2024). Quantitative evaluation of uncertainty and interpretability in machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping through feature selection and explainable AI. Front. Environ. Sci., 12.10.3389/fenvs.2024.1424988 ↗
26. Exploring the spatial patterns of landslide susceptibility assessment using interpretable Shapley method: Mechanisms of landslide formation in the Sichuan-Tibet region10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121921 ↗
27. Song, Y., Niu, R., Xu, S., Ye, R., Peng, L., Guo, T., Li, S., and Chen, T. (2019). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Weighted Gradient Boosting Decision Tree in Wanzhou Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (China). ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8010004 ↗
28. Comprehensive risk management of reservoir landslide-tsunami hazard chains: A case study of the Liangshuijing landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area10.1007/s10346-024-02283-z ↗
29. Geohazards in the three Gorges Reservoir Area, China-Lessons learned from decades of research10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105267 ↗
30. Optimizing rainfall-triggered landslide thresholds for daily landslide hazard warning in the Three Gorges Reservoir area10.5194/nhess-24-3991-2024 ↗
31. Emergency treatment effect evaluation of rear-slope cutting and front-slope pressing on a hydrodynamic pressure landslide: A case study of the Shuping landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area10.1007/s10064-023-03539-z ↗
32. Insights into Reservoir-Triggered Landslides Development and Its Influence Factors in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China10.1007/s12583-024-0024-1 ↗
33. Stacking ensemble of deep learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China10.1007/s00477-021-02032-x ↗
34. He, L., Wu, X., He, Z., Xue, D., Luo, F., Bai, W., Kang, G., Chen, X., and Zhang, Y. (2023). Susceptibility Assessment of Landslides in the Loess Plateau Based on Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Xining City. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152014761 ↗
35. Shahabi, H., Ahmadi, R., Alizadeh, M., Hashim, M., Al-Ansari, N., Shirzadi, A., Wolf, I.D., and Ariffin, E.H. (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Mountainous Area Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15123112 ↗
36. Lin, N., Zhang, D., Feng, S., Ding, K., Tan, L., Wang, B., Chen, T., Li, W., Dai, X., and Pan, J. (2023). Rapid Landslide Extraction from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images Using SHAP-OPT-XGBoost. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15153901 ↗
37. Dai, X., Chen, J., Zhang, T., and Xue, C. (2025). Integrated Landslide Risk Assessment via a Landslide Susceptibility Model Based on Intelligent Optimization Algorithms. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17030545 ↗
38. Chang, Z.L., Huang, F.M., Huang, J.S., Jiang, S.H., Liu, Y.T., Meena, S.R., and Catani, F. (2023). An updating of landslide susceptibility prediction from the perspective of space and time. Geosci. Front., 14.10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101619 ↗
39. Statistical stability indices for LIME: Obtaining reliable explanations for machine learning models10.1080/01605682.2020.1865846 ↗
40. SHAP-PDP hybrid interpretation of decision-making mechanism of machine learning-based landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study at Wushan District, China
41. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
42. Publisher Correction: Improving landslide susceptibility prediction through ensemble recursive feature elimination and meta-learning framework10.1038/s41598-025-87587-3 ↗
43. Hu, L., and Yan, C. (2024). Evaluation of Landslide Susceptibility of Mangshan Mountain in Zhengzhou Based on GWO-1D CNN Model. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16125086 ↗
44. Li, X., Li, W., Wu, Z., Xu, Q., Zheng, D., Dong, X., Lu, H., Shan, Y., Zhou, S., and Yu, W. (2024). Identification and Deformation Characteristics of Active Landslides at Large Hydropower Stations at the Early Impoundment Stage: A Case Study of the Lianghekou Reservoir Area in Sichuan Province, Southwest China. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16173175 ↗
45. A variable selection method based on mutual information and variance inflation factor10.1016/j.saa.2021.120652 ↗
46. Wang, Z., Ma, C., Qiu, Y., Xiong, H., and Li, M. (2022). Refined Zoning of Landslide Susceptibility: A Case Study in Enshi County, Hubei, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19159412 ↗
47. Research on the influence of different sampling resolution and spatial resolution in sampling strategy on landslide susceptibility mapping results10.1038/s41598-024-52145-w ↗
48. Integration of convolutional neural network and conventional machine learning classifiers for landslide susceptibility mapping10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104470 ↗
49. Insights into landslide susceptibility: A comparative evaluation of multi-criteria analysis and machine learning techniques10.1080/19475705.2025.2471019 ↗
50. Yu, X., Xiong, T., Jiang, W., and Zhou, J. (2023). Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of the Five Kinds of Models in Landslide Susceptibility Map for Factor Screening: A Case Study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010800 ↗
51. Factors controlling landslide frequency–area distributions10.1002/esp.4543 ↗
52. Jiang, W., Li, L., and Niu, R. (2025). Impact of Non-Landslide Sample Sampling Strategies and Model Selection on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15042132 ↗
53. Comparative assessment of machine learning models for landslide susceptibility mapping: A focus on validation and accuracy10.1007/s11069-025-07197-0 ↗
54. Kumar, C., Walton, G., Santi, P., and Luza, C. (2025). Random Cross-Validation Produces Biased Assessment of Machine Learning Performance in Regional Landslide Susceptibility Prediction. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17020213 ↗
55. Selecting optimal conditioning factors in shallow translational landslide susceptibility mapping using genetic algorithm10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.04.004 ↗
56. Quantitative assessment of landslide susceptibility on the Loess Plateau in China10.1080/02723646.2019.1674559 ↗
57. Effects of combination of influencing factors on earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility assessments10.1007/s12665-025-12203-6 ↗
58. Integrating interpretable artificial neural networks, geomorphic plausibility and transfer learning for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study of Pacitan, East Java10.1007/s43621-025-01959-3 ↗
59. Umar, I.H., Lin, H., and Hassan, J.I. (2024). Transforming Landslide Prediction: A Novel Approach Combining Numerical Methods and Advanced Correlation Analysis in Slope Stability Investigation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14093685 ↗
60. Arslan, A.K., Yagin, F.H., Algarni, A., AL-Hashem, F., and Ardigò, L.P. (2024). Combining the Strengths of the Explainable Boosting Machine and Metabolomics Approaches for Biomarker Discovery in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Diagnostics, 14.10.3390/diagnostics14131353 ↗
61. Enhancing landslide susceptibility predictions with XGBoost and SHAP: A data-driven explainable AI method10.1080/10106049.2025.2514725 ↗
62. Yang, Y., Ma, X., Ding, W., Wen, H., and Sun, D. (2024). A Novel Dataset Replenishment Strategy Integrating Time-Series InSAR for Refined Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Karst Regions. Water, 16.10.3390/w16172414 ↗
63. Clarifying the effectiveness of drainage tunnels in landslide controls based on high-frequency in-site monitoring10.1007/s10064-020-01769-z ↗
64. Wang, H., Xu, J., Tan, S., and Zhou, J. (2023). Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Based on a Coupled Informative–Logistic Regression Model—Shuangbai County as an Example. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151612449 ↗
65. Genetic mechanism of water-rich landslide considering antecedent rainfalls; A case study of Pingyikou landslide in Three Gorges Reservoir area10.1007/s12583-022-1722-1 ↗
66. Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (Karakoram Highway), Pakistan10.5194/nhess-19-999-2019 ↗
67. A hybrid integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the multiobjective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) for landslide susceptibility zonation of Aizawl, India10.1007/s11069-024-06538-9 ↗
68. Size distribution and size of loess slidesin response to slope height and slope gradient based on field survey data10.1080/19475705.2019.1584590 ↗
69. The relationship between three-dimensional coseismic displacement and distribution of coseismic landslides10.1007/s11430-021-1088-1 ↗
70. Fusco, F., Mirus, B.B., Baum, R.L., Calcaterra, D., and De Vita, P. (2021). Incorporating the Effects of Complex Soil Layering and Thickness Local Variability into Distributed Landslide Susceptibility Assessments. Water, 13.10.3390/w13050713 ↗
71. Chen, G., Cai, P., Zhan, J., Yang, Y., Yao, Z., and Yu, Z. (2024). Deformation Patterns and Failure Mechanisms of Soft-Hard-Interbedded Anti-Inclined Layered Rock Slope in Wolong Open-Pit Coal Mine. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14073082 ↗
72. Study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on rock–soil characteristic factors10.1038/s41598-021-94936-5 ↗
73. Size distribution of loess slides in relation to local slope height within different slope morphologies10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.005 ↗
74. Zhang, J., Qian, J., Lu, Y., Li, X., and Song, Z. (2024). Study on Landslide Susceptibility Based on Multi-Model Coupling: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16166803 ↗
75. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression, random forest and decision and regression tree models in Chattogram District, Bangladesh10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23424 ↗
76. Increase in landslide activity after a low-magnitude earthquake as inferred from DInSAR interferometry10.1038/s41598-022-06508-w ↗
77. Landslide hazard assessment in the Himalayas (Nepal and Bhutan) based on Earth-Observation data10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.020 ↗