journal article·2026-04-24Open access

Soil-Aware Deep Learning for Robust Interpretation of Low-Strain Pile Integrity Tests

Bora Canbula, Övünç Öztürk, Vehbi Özacar, Tuğba Özacar

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

The Low-Strain Pile Integrity Test (LSPIT), standardized in ASTM D5882, is widely used as a rapid and economical non-destructive technique for assessing pile continuity in deep foundation systems. However, interpretation of LSPIT reflectograms remains strongly dependent on expert judgment and is influenced by soil–pile interaction effects such as damping and radiation losses, which can alter waveform morphology and confound automated defect screening. This study proposes a soil-aware deep learning framework that combines image-based reflectogram features with categorical geotechnical context describing the dominant soil regime at the measurement site. Reflectogram images are processed with a pretrained ConvNeXt-Large backbone, while soil information derived from Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) logs is represented as a categorical auxiliary input and mapped to a learnable embedding. The resulting multimodal design conditions waveform interpretation based on site context rather than relying on signal morphology alone. The framework is examined on an assembled benchmark of 510 expert-labeled reflectograms (404 intact and 106 defective), including a nine-site subset of 182 field records with explicit soil annotations. On the assembled benchmark, the model yields 99.41% accuracy and a weighted F1-score of 0.9941; on the nine-site subset, the observed accuracy is 99.45% with zero missed defective cases. Balanced accuracy, specificity, missed-detection rate, false-alarm rate, and confidence intervals are additionally reported to better align the evaluation with engineering screening practice. The study also states the current limits of the evidence base, including partial soil annotation, dominant-soil simplification, restricted soil coverage, and the absence of leave-site-out and interpretability-focused validation. Overall, the results support soil-aware multimodal learning as a promising proof-of-concept direction for more context-aware automated LSPIT interpretation, while also identifying the validation steps still required for broad field deployment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Dam Engineering and Safety

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Yunusemre 45140, Manisa, Türkiye

Canbula Software Research and Development Ltd. Co., Manisa Technopark, Yunusemre 45140, Manisa, Türkiye

Octahedron Innovation Informatics Electronics and Mining Services Inc., Manisa Technopark, Yunusemre 45140, Manisa, Türkiye

Torbalı Vocational School, Dokuz Eylul University, Torbalı 35860, Izmir, Türkiye

Funding

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. (2013). Standard Test Method for Low Strain Impact Integrity Testing of Deep Foundations (Standard No. ASTM D5882-07(2013)).
2. Soil Damping Effects on Integrity Test of Piles
3. Webster, K., Rausche, F., and Webster, S. (2011, January 23–27). Pile and shaft integrity test results, classification, acceptance and/or rejection. Proceedings of the TRB 90th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
4. Intelligent integrity detection and damage localization of pile from low-strain test using deep learning with accelerated training via variable-order gradient descent10.1016/j.aei.2025.103690 ↗
5. Cui, D.M., Yan, W., Wang, X.Q., and Lu, L.M. (2017). Towards intelligent interpretation of low strain pile integrity testing results using machine learning techniques. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17112443 ↗
6. Time–frequency analyses of pile-integrity testing using wavelet transform10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.09.003 ↗
7. Wu, C.S., Ge, M., Qi, L.L., Zhuo, D.B., Zhang, J.Q., Hao, T.Q., and Peng, Y.X. (2023). Multi-Defect Identification of Concrete Piles Based on Low Strain Integrity Test and Two-Channel Convolutional Neural Network. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063530 ↗
8. Classification of pile foundation integrity based on convolutional neural network10.1007/s12517-022-10057-x ↗
9. Wang, H., Zhang, S., Li, J., Yuan, Y., and Zhang, F. (2023). Classification of low-strain foundation pile testing signal using recurrent neural network. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13051228 ↗
10. Ma, L., Duan, Z., Guo, W., and Ren, Y. (2024). Numerical studies on low-strain integrity testing of cast-in-place pile. Front. Built Environ., 10.10.3389/fbuil.2024.1330580 ↗
11. Öztürk, Ö., Özacar, T., and Canbula, B. (2025). Transfer learning-based detection of pile defects in low-strain pile integrity testing. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15158278 ↗
12. Qiu, P., Yang, L., Xie, Y., Liu, X., and Chen, Z. (2025). Pile Integrity Testing Using Non-Destructive Testing Techniques and Artificial Intelligence: A Review. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15158580 ↗
13. Recurrent neural network long short term memory model to detect the pile toe using raw data of pile integrity test10.1038/s41598-026-36732-7 ↗
14. Wu, J., El Naggar, M.H., and Wang, K. (2023). Pile Damage Detection Using Machine Learning with the Multipoint Traveling Wave Decomposition Method. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23198308 ↗
15. Wu, J., El Naggar, M.H., and Wang, K. (2024). A Hybrid Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Network for Multi-Sensor Pile Damage Detection with Time Series. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24041190 ↗
16. Wang, K., Zhao, W., Wu, J., and Ma, S. (2025). Intelligent Testing Method for Multi-Point Vibration Acquisition of Pile Foundation Based on Machine Learning. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25092893 ↗
17. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
18. Using explainability to design physics-aware CNNs for solving subsurface inverse problems10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105452 ↗
19. State-of-the-art review on the use of AI-enhanced computational mechanics in geotechnical engineering10.1007/s10462-024-10836-w ↗
20. Bridging AI and explainability in civil engineering: The Yin–Yang of predictive power and interpretability10.1007/s43503-025-00066-6 ↗
21. Soil structure interaction and the radiation damping: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104755 ↗
22. Artificial intelligence transformations in geotechnics: Progress, challenges and future enablers10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107604 ↗
23. Physics-informed machine learning in geotechnical engineering: A direction paper10.1080/17486025.2025.2502029 ↗
24. (2017). Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) (Standard No. ASTM D2487-11).
25. García-Gaines, R.A., and Frankenstein, S. (2015). USCS and the USDA Soil Classification System: Development of a Mapping Scheme, Technical Report ERDC/CRREL TR-15-4.10.21236/ADA614144 ↗
26. Engineering properties of peat soils in Peninsular, Malaysia10.3923/jas.2008.4215.4219 ↗
27. An overview of the basic engineering properties of Malaysian peats10.1016/j.geodrs.2017.08.003 ↗
28. Swelling-shrinkage behavior of natural expansive clays10.1016/S0169-1317(96)00009-9 ↗
29. Swell and microstructural characteristics of high-plasticity clay blended with cement10.1007/s10064-019-01621-z ↗
30. Devkota, B., Karim, M.R., Rahman, M.M., and Nguyen, H.B.K. (2022). Accounting for expansive soil movement in geotechnical design—A state-of-the-art review. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142315662 ↗
31. Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., and Xie, S. (2022). A ConvNet for the 2020s. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167 ↗
32. Guo, C., and Berkhahn, F. (2016). Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variables. arXiv.