AI-Driven Energy Management for Sustainable Transformation of Recreational Boats: A Simulation Study for the Croatian Adriatic Coast
Source abstract
Abstract
Croatia hosts one of the most intensive recreational boating activities in the Mediterranean, with over 134,600 registered vessels along 5835 km of Adriatic coastline. This paper presents an AI-driven simulation framework for evaluating electrification pathways for the Croatian recreational vessel fleet. A key contribution is the explicit treatment of the AIS data gap: recreational vessels in Croatia are not required to carry AIS transponders, so synthetic operational profiles calibrated from manufacturer specifications and verified economic data are used instead. Six machine learning architectures are compared for vessel energy demand forecasting, with a proposed Transformer-based model achieving the best simulated performance. Fleet-weighted Monte Carlo simulation across three electrification scenarios suggests that an AI-optimised hybrid configuration can, subject to use intensity, reduce per-vessel CO2 emissions by up to 56.8% relative to conventional engines. Techno-economic analysis shows payback periods ranging from over 15 years for low-use private owners to 7–9 years for charter operators, supporting targeted incentive design. The framework is intended to be transferable to other Mediterranean coastal regions facing comparable data and operational constraints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency · Maritime Navigation and Safety · Maritime Ports and Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Automation and Computing, Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Funding
University of Rijeka
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. A global review of marine air pollution policies, their scope and effectiveness10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105824 ↗
2. Model calculations of the effects of present and future emissions of air pollutants from shipping in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea10.5194/acp-15-783-2015 ↗
3. Državni zavod za statistiku (DZS) (2024). Nautički Turizam—Kapaciteti i Poslovanje Luka Nautičkog Turizma u 2024, DZS. Available online: https://podaci.dzs.hr/2024/hr/76899.
4. The IMO initial strategy for reducing Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, and its follow-up actions towards 2050
5. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
6. Bengio, Y., Goodfellow, I., and Courville, A. (2017). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
7. The development of a ship performance model in varying operating conditions based on ANN and regression techniques10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106972 ↗
8. Machine learning approaches for improving condition-based maintenance of naval propulsion plants
9. Ship voyage optimization for safe and energy-efficient navigation: A dynamic programming approach10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.100 ↗
10. Maritime freight carbon emission in the US using AIS data from 2018 to 202210.1038/s41597-024-03391-0 ↗
11. Global assessment of shipping emissions in 2015 on a high spatial and temporal resolution10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.042 ↗
12. Environmental impacts of increasing leisure boating activity in Mediterranean coastal waters10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105693 ↗
13. Release of PAHs and heavy metals in coastal environments linked to leisure boats10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.12.060 ↗
14. Model for leisure boat activities and emissions–implementation for the Baltic Sea10.5194/os-16-1143-2020 ↗
15. Europeia, C. (2025, December 12). Fit for 55: Delivering the EU’s 2030 climate target on the way to climate neutrality. COM 2021, 550. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0550.
16. European Parliament and the Council (2026, January 28). Regulation (EU) 2023/1805. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1805/oj.
17. Porru, M., Pisano, M., Serpi, A., and Pilo, F. (2020). Electrification of Leisure Boats: A commercial State-of-the-Art. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), IEEE.10.1109/VPPC49601.2020.9330879 ↗
18. Aksöz, A., Asal, B., Golestan, S., Gençtürk, M., Oyucu, S., and Biçer, E. (2025). Electrification in maritime vessels: Reviewing storage solutions and long-term energy management. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105259 ↗
19. Perčić, M., Vladimir, N., and Koričan, M. (2021). Electrification of inland waterway ships considering power system lifetime emissions and costs. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14217046 ↗
20. Model based optimal management of a hybrid propulsion system for leisure boats10.1016/j.est.2021.103896 ↗
21. Development of a multi-scheme energy management strategy for a hybrid fuel cell driven passenger ship10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.209 ↗
22. Optimal sizing of hybrid PV/diesel/battery in ship power system10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.031 ↗
23. Machine learning models for predicting ship main engine Fuel Oil Consumption: A comparative study10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106282 ↗
24. A deep learning method for the prediction of ship fuel consumption in real operational conditions10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107425 ↗
25. Li, X., Zuo, Y., Li, T., and Chen, C.P. (2023). A novel machine learning model using CNN-LSTM parallel networks for predicting ship fuel consumption. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-99-8082-6_9 ↗
26. A novel GA-LSTM-based prediction method of ship energy usage based on the characteristics analysis of operational data10.1016/j.energy.2023.128910 ↗
27. nauCAT (2025). Statistička Analiza Plovila u Republici Hrvatskoj, nauCAT. Available online: https://www.naucat.com/hr/vijesti/nauticka-industrija/statisticka-analiza-plovila-250220.
28. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2002). SOLAS Chapter V, Regulation 19—Carriage Requirements for Shipborne Navigational Systems and Equipment, IMO. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/AIS.aspx.
29. (2022). Automotive Fuels—Diesel—Requirements and Test Methods (Standard No. EN 590:2022).
30. Yanmar Co. Ltd (2023). 3JH40 Marine Diesel Engine—Technical Specifications, Yanmar. Available online: https://yacht-yard.com/engines/yanmar/3jh40.
31. European Boating Industry (2025, November 25). EBI and NMMA to Develop First Globally Aligned Recreational Marine Life Cycle Assessment. Available online: https://europeanboatingindustry.eu/newsroom/latest-news/item/1052-icomia-ebi-and-nmma-to-develop-first-globally-aligned-recreational-marine-life-cycle-assessment.
32. The ERA5 global reanalysis10.1002/qj.3803 ↗
33. An approximate power prediction method10.3233/ISP-1982-2933501 ↗
34. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30.
35. European Commission (2023). Weekly Oil Bulletin—Croatia Diesel Retail Prices 2020–2023, Directorate-General for Energy. Available online: https://www.fuel-prices.eu/Croatia/.
36. Marina Punat, d.o.o (2026). Price List 2026, Marina Punat. Available online: https://www.marina-punat.hr/UserDocsImages/dokumenti/Cjenici2026/engleski_mp_brosura_cjenik_2026_web.pdf.
37. Tesla Energy (2023). Megapack 2XL Technical Datasheet, Tesla, Inc.
38. Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting
39. Durlik, I., Miller, T., Kostecka, E., Łobodzińska, A., and Kostecki, T. (2024). Harnessing AI for sustainable shipping and green ports: Challenges and opportunities. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14145994 ↗
40. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2022). Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) Guidelines, IMO. MEPC.352(78).
41. Al Amerl, A., Oukkacha, I., Camara, M.B., and Dakyo, B. (2021). Real-time control strategy of fuel cell and battery system for electric hybrid boat application. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13168693 ↗
42. State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping–A review10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022 ↗