journal article·2026-04-24Open access

Comparison of Sampling Systems for Biological Sample Dehumidification Prior to Electronic Nose Analysis

Ana Maria Tischer, Beatrice Julia Lotesoriere, Stefano Robbiani, Hamid Navid, Emanuele Zanni, Carmen Bax, Fabio Grizzi, Gianluigi Taverna, Raffaele Dellacà, Laura Capelli

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

It is well known that gas sensor responses are affected by the presence of humidity in the analyzed gas. This is particularly true when dealing with biological fluid samples, whose high moisture content interferes with the adsorption of the trace volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the sensors’ active layer. To address this challenge, this study focuses on designing and testing a novel sampling system for the dehumidification of biological fluid headspace to be characterized by an electronic nose (e-Nose). Such a system, based on the use of disposable polymeric sampling bags purged with dry air, exploits the polymers’ permeability to water vapor to reduce sample humidity. Tested materials included NalophanTM (20 μm), high-density polyethylene (HDPE, 8, 9, 10 and 11 μm), low-density polyethylene (LDPE, 12 and 50 μm), and biodegradable polyester (Bio-PS, 15 μm). First, dehumidification performance was characterized as a function of dry air flow rate and film type. A purge of 1 L/min accelerated the sample humidity removal compared to passive storage of bags from >2 h to <1 h (from 80% to 20% RH). Second, a mass-balance model was applied to dedicated experiments to decouple water losses due to diffusion and adsorption, showing that diffusion through the polymer wall dominates, while adsorption occurs in the early stages of conditioning. Third, because these materials are not selectively permeable to water, potential loss of water-soluble VOCs during dehumidification was investigated. Pooled urine headspace samples—both raw and spiked with a metabolite mix of VOCs—were dried using each material and analyzed using a photo-ionization detector (PID) and an e-Nose. Results were compared against a NafionTM dryer. Comparison was based on the e-Nose’s ability to discriminate between pooled vs. spiked samples and reveal real-life metabolomic changes. NalophanTM bags and NafionTM dryer provided the highest VOC fingerprint to support discrimination by the e-Nose, while Bio-PS provided the fastest sample dehumidification. The proposed bag-based system offers a cost-effective, disposable, and contamination-free solution to humidity interference in e-Noses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Materials, and Chemical Engineering Giulio Natta, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy

Department of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy

Department of Immunology and Inflammation, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy

Department of Urology, Humanitas Mater Domini, 21100 Castellanza, Italy

Funding

National Plan for NRRP Complementary Investments

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Artificial Olfaction in the 21st Century10.1109/JSEN.2021.3076412 ↗
2. Electronic Noses for Environmental Monitoring Applications10.3390/s141119979 ↗
3. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Wastewater: Recent Advances in Detection and Quantification10.1016/j.microc.2023.109537 ↗
4. Air Pollution Monitoring with Nanoscaled Materials in Chemoresistive Gas Sensors10.1021/acsami.5c24099 ↗
5. Principles and Recent Advances in Electronic Nose for Quality Inspection of Agricultural and Food Products
6. Application of Electronic Nose Systems for Assessing Quality of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Products: A Review
7. Smart Detection of Food Spoilage Using Microbial Volatile Compounds: Technologies, Challenges, and Future Outlook10.1021/acs.jafc.5c05927 ↗
8. Advances in Electronic-Nose Technologies Developed for Biomedical Applications10.3390/s110101105 ↗
9. Advances in Volatile Organic Compounds-Based Biomarker Detection Using Nanomaterial-Integrated Sensor Platforms for Cancer Diagnosis10.1021/acsaelm.5c02148 ↗
10. Robbiani, S., Lotesoriere, B.J., Dellacà, R.L., and Capelli, L. (2023). Physical Confounding Factors Affecting Gas Sensors Response: A Review on Effects and Compensation Strategies for Electronic Nose Applications. Chemosensors, 11.10.3390/chemosensors11100514 ↗
11. Metal Oxide Gas Sensors: Sensitivity and Influencing Factors10.3390/s100302088 ↗
12. Wang, Y., and Zhou, Y. (2022). Recent Progress on Anti-Humidity Strategies of Chemiresistive Gas Sensors. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15248728 ↗
13. Humidity Compensation Based on Power-Law Response for MOS Sensors to VOCs10.1016/j.snb.2021.129601 ↗
14. Effects of Temperature and Humidity on the Performance of a PECH Polymer Coated SAW Sensor10.1039/D0RA02502J ↗
15. Tischer, A.M., Lotesoriere, B.J., and Capelli, L. (2026). How to Manage the Humidity of Biological Samples to Reduce Interference on Chemical Sensors. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1–26.10.1080/10408347.2026.2641165 ↗
16. Breath Sensors for Health Monitoring10.1021/acssensors.8b00937 ↗
17. Ratti, C., Bax, C., Lotesoriere, B.J., and Capelli, L. (2024). Real-Time Monitoring of Odour Emissions at the Fenceline of a Waste Treatment Plant by Instrumental Odour Monitoring Systems: Focus on Training Methods. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24113506 ↗
18. A Miniaturized Electronic Nose with Artificial Neural Network for Anti-Interference Detection of Mixed Indoor Hazardous Gases10.1016/j.snb.2020.128822 ↗
19. Characterisation of Humidity Dependence of a Metal Oxide Semiconductor Sensor Array Using Partial Least Squares10.1016/j.snb.2007.11.009 ↗
20. An Electronic Nose Based on Carbon Nanotube -Titanium Dioxide Hybrid Nanostructures for Detection and Discrimination of Volatile Organic Compounds10.1016/j.snb.2022.131418 ↗
21. Performance Optimization of Semiconductor Gas Sensors Based on Interfacial Reaction Regulation: Status and Challenges10.1021/acssensors.5c02681 ↗
22. Sorptive Sample Preparation—A Review10.1007/s00216-002-1266-2 ↗
23. Sample Preparation for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air and Water Matrices10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.012 ↗
24. Sorbent Trapping of Volatile Organic Compounds from Air10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00363-0 ↗
25. Sorbent-Based Sampling Methods for Volatile and Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds in Air10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.042 ↗
26. Dinh, T.V., and Kim, J.C. (2021). Moisture Removal Techniques for a Continuous Emission Monitoring System: A Review. Atmosphere, 12.10.3390/atmos12010061 ↗
27. Bax, C., Robbiani, S., Zannin, E., Capelli, L., Ratti, C., Bonetti, S., Novelli, L., Raimondi, F., Di Marco, F., and Dellacà, R.L. (2022). An Experimental Apparatus for E-Nose Breath Analysis in Respiratory Failure Patients. Diagnostics, 12.10.3390/diagnostics12040776 ↗
28. Bax, C., Lotesoriere, B.J., Sironi, S., and Capelli, L. (2019). Review and Comparison of Cancer Biomarker Trends in Urine as a Basis for New Diagnostic Pathways. Cancers, 11.10.3390/cancers11091244 ↗
29. (2026, March 10). Monotube Dryer (MD) Series Gas Dryer. Available online: https://salaera.com/products/monotube-dryer-md-series-gas-dryer.
30. Xiang, C., Wang, W., Zhao, X., Yang, N., and Tu, C. (2019). Dehumidification Performance of the Nafion Tube for SO2 at Low Concentration. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Physics Publishing.10.1088/1757-899X/490/2/022036 ↗
31. Problems with a Nafion® Membrane Dryer for Drying Chromatographic Samples10.1016/S0021-9673(01)90777-0 ↗
32. Cost Effective Cation Exchange Membranes: A Review10.1016/j.cherd.2011.10.015 ↗
33. (2022). Stationary Source Emissions—Determination of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry and Odour Emission Rate (Standard No. EN 13725:2022).
34. Ammonia Diffusion Phenomena through NalophanTM Bags Used for Olfactometric Analyses10.4236/jep.2014.511096 ↗
35. Optimization of Training and Measurement Protocol for eNose Analysis of Urine Headspace Aimed at Prostate Cancer Diagnosis10.1038/s41598-021-00033-y ↗
36. On the Use of Tedlar® Bags for Breath-Gas Sampling and Analysis10.1088/1752-7155/2/4/046001 ↗
37. Systematic Study of Polymer Gas Sampling Bags for Offline Analysis of Exhaled Breath10.1088/1752-7163/ad6a31 ↗
38. H2S Loss through NalophanTM Bags: Contributions of Adsorption and Diffusion10.1155/2017/9690704 ↗
39. Mechanisms of Loss of Agricultural Odorous Compounds in Sample Bags of Nalophan, Tedlar, and PTFE10.2134/jeq2017.07.0289 ↗
40. Accuracy of a New Electronic Nose for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Urine Samples10.1111/iju.14912 ↗
41. Cassinerio, M., Lotesoriere, B.J., Robbiani, S., Zanni, E., Grizzi, F., Taverna, G., Dellacà, R., and Capelli, L.M.T. (2025). Development of a Calibration Transfer Methodology and Experimental Setup for Urine Headspace Analysis. Chemosensors, 13.10.3390/chemosensors13110395 ↗
42. Efficiency and Temperature Dependence of Water Removal by Membrane Dryers10.1021/ac9610220 ↗
43. Detecting Hexafluoroisopropanol Using Soft Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Analytical Applications to Exhaled Breath10.1021/jasms.3c00042 ↗
44. Yue, S., Zhang, T., Wang, S., Han, D., Huang, S., Xiao, M., and Meng, Y. (2024). Recent Progress of Biodegradable Polymer Package Materials: Nanotechnology Improving Both Oxygen and Water Vapor Barrier Performance. Nanomaterials, 14.10.3390/nano14040338 ↗
45. The Human Volatilome: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Exhaled Breath, Skin Emanations, Urine, Feces and Saliva10.1088/1752-7155/8/3/034001 ↗
46. Cassinerio, M. (2025). Beatrice Julia Lotesoriere Addressing the Issue of Gas Sensor Reproducibility: Development of a Calibration Transfer Methodology for Urine Headspace Analysis, Politecnico di Milano.10.3390/chemosensors13110395 ↗
47. Signal and Data Processing for Machine Olfaction and Chemical Sensing: A Review10.1109/JSEN.2012.2192920 ↗
48. Drift Compensation on Electronic Nose Data for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Urine Analysis10.1016/j.isci.2021.103622 ↗
49. On Orthogonal Signal Correction10.1016/S0169-7439(99)00045-3 ↗
50. De Choosing the Kernel Parameters for Support Vector Machines by the Inter-Cluster Distance in the Feature Space10.1016/j.patcog.2008.08.030 ↗
51. Benchmarking Validity Indices for Evolutionary K-Means Clustering Performance10.1038/s41598-025-08473-6 ↗
52. Fernandez, L., Oller-Moreno, S., Fonollosa, J., Garrido-Delgado, R., Arce, L., Martín-Gómez, A., Marco, S., and Pardo, A. (2025). Signal Preprocessing in Instrument-Based Electronic Noses Leads to Parsimonious Predictive Models: Application to Olive Oil Quality Control. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25030737 ↗
53. Metz, S.J. (2003). Water Vapor and Gas Transport Through Polymeric Membranes. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente].
54. Qin, P., Wu, L., Li, B., Li, N., Pan, X., and Dai, J. (2021). Superior Gas Barrier Properties of Biodegradable PBST vs. PBAT Copolyesters: A Comparative Study. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13193449 ↗
55. Keller, P.E., and Kouzes, R. (2017). Water Vapor Permeation in Plastics, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.10.2172/1411940 ↗
56. Permeability and Adsorption Effects for Volatile Sulphur Compounds in Nalophan Sampling Bags: Stability Influenced by Storage Time10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.10.023 ↗
57. The Sorption, Diffusion, and Permeation of Organic Vapors in Polyethylene10.1002/pol.1960.1204514506 ↗
58. Diffusion Coefficients of Organics in High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)10.1177/0734242X9401200107 ↗
59. Review of Volatile Organic Compounds Derived from Polyethylene10.1081/PPT-100101409 ↗
60. Reducing the Destructive Effect of Ambient Humidity Variations on Gas Detection Capability of a Temperature Modulated Gas Sensor by Calcium Chloride10.1016/j.snb.2020.129091 ↗
61. Water Transport Properties of Poly(Butylene Succinate) and Poly[(Butylene Succinate)-Co-(Butylene Adipate)] Nanocomposite Films: Influence of the Water-Assisted Extrusion Process10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11077 ↗
62. Pannico, M., and La Manna, P. (2019). Sorption of Water Vapor in Poly(L-Lactic Acid): A Time-Resolved FTIR Spectroscopy Investigation. Front. Chem., 7.10.3389/fchem.2019.00275 ↗
63. Polvara, E., Gariboldi, A., Proserpio, B., Invernizzi, M., and Sironi, S. (2025). Storage Stability of Odorants in NalophanTM Bags: Effect of Storage Condition on Recovery. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15179258 ↗
64. Influence of Ammonia on the Conductivity of Nafion Membranes10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.07.013 ↗
65. Sachse, D., Glüsen, A., Wippermann, K., Müller, M., Rau, U., and Peters, R. (2025). The Ammonia Adsorption and Desorption Behavior of Nafion. Membranes, 15.10.3390/membranes15050149 ↗
66. Enhanced Ammonia Recovery from Wastewater by Nafion Membrane with Highly Porous Honeycomb Nanostructure and Its Mechanism in Membrane Distillation10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117265 ↗