A Multi-Scale Deep Network for Aircraft Wake Vortex Recognition Using Lidar Radial Velocity Fields
Source abstract
Abstract
Aircraft wake vortices pose significant threats to following aircraft during takeoff and landing phases. Coherent Doppler lidar provides an effective remote sensing technique for wake vortex monitoring through radial velocity measurements. However, reliable identification of wake vortices from lidar observations remains challenging due to noise and the complex multi-scale evolution of vortex structures. In this study, we propose a physics-guided multi-scale deep network (HMNet) for aircraft wake vortex identification. First, we propose a denoising module (DE) to suppress noise in radial velocity fields. Subsequently, we design a hybrid multi-scale backbone network containing a hybrid multi-scale feature extraction module (HMFE) to capture vortex structures at different spatial scales. Furthermore, we propose a feature gradient guidance module (FGGM) to incorporate physically meaningful gradient cues and enhance vortex-sensitive features. HMNet is evaluated and tested on 1401 radial velocity field data samples collected on the runway at Shenzhen Bao’an Airport. The experimental results show that HMNet achieves 97.15% accuracy, 95.83% recall, and 96.84% F1 score. Compared with the baseline VGG16 and Random Forest, HMNet improves accuracy by 6.18% and 11.88%, respectively. These results demonstrate that HMNet provides an effective solution for lidar-based wake vortex identification and can support the development of intelligent air traffic management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Air Traffic Management, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China
College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Funding
Civil Aviation Flight University of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Wake vortex characteristics of transport aircraft10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.09.002 ↗
2. Gharbia, Y., Derakhshandeh, J.F., Alam, M.M., and Amer, A. (2023). Developments in wingtip vorticity mitigation techniques: A comprehensive review. Aerospace, 11.10.3390/aerospace11010036 ↗
3. Lang, S., Tittsworth, J., Bryant, W., Wilson, P., Lepadatu, C., Delisi, D., Lai, D., and Greene, G. (2010). Progress on an ICAO wake turbulence re-categorization effort. Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, AIAA.10.2514/6.2010-7682 ↗
4. On an analytical model of wake vortex separation of aircraft10.1017/aer.2016.89 ↗
5. Wind-tunnel studies of wing wake turbulence10.2514/3.59082 ↗
6. Numerical simulation of aircraft wake vortex evolution and wake encounters based on adaptive mesh method
7. Characterization of aircraft wake vortices by 2-μm pulsed Doppler lidar10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0194:COAWVB>2.0.CO;2 ↗
8. Strategies for circulation evaluation of aircraft wake vortices measured by lidar10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1183:SFCEOA>2.0.CO;2 ↗
9. Liu, X., Zhang, X., Zhai, X., Zhang, H., Liu, B., and Wu, S. (2020). Observation of aircraft wake vortex evolution under crosswind conditions by pulsed coherent Doppler lidar. Atmosphere, 12.10.3390/atmos12010049 ↗
10. Rojas, J.I., Melgosa, M., and Prats, X. (2021). Sensitivity analysis of maximum circulation of wake vortex encountered by en-route aircraft. Aerospace, 8.10.3390/aerospace8070194 ↗
11. Onboard wake vortex localization with a coherent 1.5 μm Doppler LIDAR for aircraft in formation flight configuration10.1364/OE.377049 ↗
12. Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8 ↗
13. Manakitsa, N., Maraslidis, G.S., Moysis, L., and Fragulis, G.F. (2024). A review of machine learning and deep learning for object detection, semantic segmentation, and human action recognition in machine and robotic vision. Technologies, 12.10.3390/technologies12020015 ↗
14. Runoff prediction using hydro-meteorological variables and a new hybrid ANFIS-GPR model10.2166/wcc.2023.427 ↗
15. Deng, L., Pan, W., Wang, Y., Luan, T., and Leng, Y. (2024). Aircraft wake evolution prediction based on parallel hybrid neural network model. Aerospace, 11.10.20944/preprints202405.0814.v1 ↗
16. Pan, W., Wang, Y., Deng, L., Jiang, Y., and Leng, Y. (2025). Aircraft wake vortex recognition method based on improved Inception-VGG16 hybrid network. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25092909 ↗
17. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., and Alemi, A. (2017). Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AIAA.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 ↗
18. Identification of aircraft wake vortex based on VGGNet10.1155/2022/1487854 ↗
19. Xu, D., and Wu, Y. (2020). MRFF-YOLO: A multi-receptive fields fusion network for remote sensing target detection. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12193118 ↗
20. Aircraft wake recognition and strength classification based on deep learning10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3243941 ↗
21. Ma, Y., Tang, X., Shi, Y., and Chan, P.W. (2024). YOLOv8n–CBAM–EfficientNetV2 Model for Aircraft Wake Recognition. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14177754 ↗
22. DBN-GABP model for estimation of aircraft wake vortex parameters using lidar data10.1016/j.cja.2024.05.011 ↗
23. A review of recent wake vortex research for increasing airport capacity10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.003 ↗
24. Aircraft wake vortex and turbulence measurement under near-ground effect using coherent Doppler lidar10.1364/OE.27.001142 ↗
25. Assessment of approach separation with probabilistic aircraft wake vortex recognition via deep learning10.1016/j.tre.2023.103387 ↗
26. Kelvin–Helmholtz instability of finite amplitude10.1017/S0022112070001295 ↗
27. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
28. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206 ↗
29. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., and Kweon, I.S. (2018). CBAM: Convolutional block attention module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗
30. Wang, Q., Wu, B., Zhu, P., Li, P., Zuo, W., and Hu, Q. (2020). ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2020, Seattle, WA, USA, 13–19 June 2020, Computer Vision Foundation/IEEE.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01155 ↗
31. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
32. Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv.
33. Tan, M., and Le, Q.V. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. arXiv.
34. Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Wang, Q., Liu, X., Liu, S., Zhang, R., Li, R., and Wu, S. (2024). Locating and grading of lidar-observed aircraft wake vortex based on convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens., 16.10.3390/rs16081463 ↗
35. Characterizing wake vortex pairs using nonsupervised machine learning10.1364/OE.564320 ↗