journal article·2023-01-28

Asphalt concrete crack propagation parameters from XFEM modelling of the Texas Overlay Test

Esra’a Alrashydah, A.T. Papagiannakis

Publisher page

Abstract

Paris’ power law is commonly used to describe transverse thermal cracking propagation in asphalt concrete (AC) pavements. In its most common format, it relates the rate of change in the crack length per cycle to changes in either the stress intensity factor K or the energy release. The parameters defining this relationship for ACs can be obtained using the Texas cyclic Overlay Test (OTR). This paper describes two numerical approaches for simulating the OTR using the extended finite element method (XFEM). The first uses the direct low-cyclic fatigue (LCF) approach and the second uses the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT). Comparisons of the model predictions to laboratory OTR measurements for six mixtures suggest that the XFEM model coupled with VCCT is better suited for simulating the OTR. The model output includes the crack length and the energy release rate ERR (i.e. ΔJR) as cracks propagate. This data was used to fit the modified Paris’ law parameters A′ and n′ as a function ΔJR. Subsequently, the traditional A and n Paris’ power law parameters were fitted by estimating the corresponding ΔK. Using this model, it was possible to efficiently estimate the AC cracking parameters using as input only the tensile modulus and the critical ERR.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

Funding

Texas Department of Transportation

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Álvarez, A. E., Walubita, L. F., and Sanchez, F, 2012. Using fracture energy to characterize the hot mix asphalt cracking resistance based on the direct-tensile test. Revista facultad de ingeniería universidad de antioquia, 64, 126–137.
2. Bartaula D. et al. 2020. Simulation of fatigue crack growth using XFEM. In Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (Vol. 83839 p. V003T03A046). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
3. 10.1155/2020/802637210.1155/2020/8026372 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.17610.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.176 ↗
5. Dassault Systèmes 2021. ABAQUS/Standard 2021 User's Manual. Providence RI.
6. 10.3390/ma1203039710.3390/ma12030397 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138908110.1080/14680629.2017.1389081 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.02610.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.026 ↗
9. 10.3141/2506-0210.3141/2506-02 ↗
10. Gutierrez A. 2016. Numerical simulation of the overlay tester. Thesis (PhD). Dept. of Civil Engineering The University of Texas at El Paso.
11. Hossain, M. I., et al., 2017. Extended finite element modeling of crack propagation in AC pavements due to thermal fatigue load. Airfield and highway pavements, 2017, 94–106.
12. 10.3141/2068-0210.3141/2068-02 ↗
13. Irwin, G.R. 1958. Fracture. In: F. Flügge, ed. Encyclopedia of physics (handbuch der physic), Vol. VI, Berlin, Springer Verlag, 551–590.
14. Jacobs M. M. J. 1995. Crack growth in asphaltic mixes. Thesis (PhD). Delft University of Technology Road and Railraod Research Laboratory The Netherlands.
15. Khanal, P. P., and Mamlouk, M. S, 1995. Tensile versus compressive moduli of asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record, 1492, 144–150.
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000067010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000670 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.159567710.1115/1.1595677 ↗
18. 10.1080/10298436.2017.140259810.1080/10298436.2017.1402598 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.17910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.179 ↗
20. London T. De Bono D. and Sun X. 2015. An evaluation of the low cycle fatigue analysis procedure in ABAQUS for crack propagation: numerical benchmarks and experimental validation. In: SIMULIA UK Regional Users Meeting.
21. 10.3141/2373-0610.3141/2373-06 ↗
22. Lytton R.L. Shanmugham W. and Garrett B.D. 1983. Design of Asphalt Pavements for Thermal Fatigue Cracking Research Report No. FHWA/TX-83/06+284-4 Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University College Station.
23. 10.1080/10298436.2021.193288010.1080/10298436.2021.1932880 ↗
24. Masad A.E Alrashydah and E. and Papagiannakis A.T. 2021. Preliminary Calibration and Validation of the Texas Mechanistic-Empirical Flexible Pavement Design International Journal of Pavement Engineering Taylor & Francis May.10.1201/9781003027362-32 ↗
25. Miramontes, A., 2015. Alternative fatigue cracking resistance assessment criteria of asphalt mixtures with overlay tester. El Paso: The University of Texas
26. Miramontes A. et al. 2017. Improved overlay tester for fatigue cracking resistance of asphalt mixtures (No. TxDOT 0-6815-1). University of Texas at El Paso. Center for Transportation Infrastructure Systems.
27. Molenaar A. A. 1983. Structural performance and design of flexible road constructions and AC overlays. Thesis (PhD). Technische Hogeschool Delft.
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.14310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.143 ↗
29. Paris P. C. and Erdogan F. 1963. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws Transactions of the ASME Journal of Basic Engineering Series D 85 No. 3.10.1115/1.3656900 ↗
30. Ramos E. et al. 2016. Explaining overlay tester results with digital image correlation and finite element analysis. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2016 (pp. 884–894).10.1061/9780784479926.080 ↗
31. Roque, R., Zhang, Z., and Sankar, B., 1999. Determination of crack growth rate parameters of asphalt mixtures using the superpave IDT. Journal of the association of asphalt paving technologists, 68, 404–433.
32. 10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-310.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
33. Schapery R.A. 1973. A Theory of Crack Growth in Viscoelastic Media ONR Contract No. N00014-68-A-0308-003 Technical Report 2 NMM 2764-73-1 Mechanics and Materials Research Center Texas AandM University College Station.
34. 10.1007/BF0003472110.1007/BF00034721 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0003510310.1007/BF00035103 ↗
36. Stephens, R. I., Fatemi, A., Stephens, R. R., and Fuchs, H. O. (2000). Metal fatigue in engineering (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons
37. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10776010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107760 ↗
38. Texas Dept. of Transportation 2021. TEX-248-F. Overlay Test Construction Division Texas Department of Transportation.
39. Vikram, N., and Kumar, R, 2013. Review on fatigue-crack growth and finite element method. International journal of scientific engineering research, 4 (4), 833–843.
40. 10.1080/1029843050050194410.1080/10298430500501944 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.09110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.091 ↗
42. 10.1007/s13369-018-3554-y10.1007/s13369-018-3554-y ↗
43. 10.1016/j.finel.2006.03.00710.1016/j.finel.2006.03.007 ↗
44. Zhou F. et al. 2009. Mechanistic-empirical asphalt overlay thickness design and analysis system (No. FHWA/TX-09/0-5123-3). Texas Transportation Institute.
45. Zhou F. Fernando E. and Scullion T. 2008. A Review of Performance Models and Test Procedures with Recommendations for Use in the Texas M-E Design Program (No. FHWA/TX-8/0-5798-1). Texas Transportation Institute Texas A and M University System.