Stress State Measurement in Wheel Rims by Means of Ultrasonic Velocity
Source abstract
Abstract
Tensile and compressive stresses generated during the exploitation of wheel rims can lead to significant failures, posing risks to safety and the environment. Among non-destructive evaluation (NDE) methods, ultrasonic velocity measurement has become widely used for assessing stress states in critical rail vehicle components such as wheel rims. In this study, the relationship between ultrasonic wave velocity and applied compressive stresses in aluminum (EN AW-2011) and austenitic stainless steel (1.4301) specimens is investigated. The methodology integrates ultrasonic time-of-flight (TOF) measurements with controlled mechanical loading up to the elastic limit. The results show that ultrasonic velocity increases with applied compressive stress, with an average change of approximately 40 m/s between unloaded and maximum loading conditions. The material type was identified as the dominant factor, with velocity differences of up to 800 m/s between aluminum and steel, while the applied load contributed changes of approximately 200 m/s. Statistical analysis using Design of Experiments (DOE) and ANOVA confirmed the significance of all main factors (p < 0.0001). The findings demonstrate the sensitivity of ultrasonic velocity to elastic stress states and provide a quantitative basis for the development of reliable in situ ultrasonic stress monitoring systems in rail applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Funding
Interreg IPA ADRION
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Lionetto, F. (2021). Ultrasound for Material Characterization and Processing. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14143891 ↗
2. Ryuzono, K., Yashiro, S., Nagai, H., and Toyama, N. (2020). Topology optimization-based damage identification using visualized ultrasonic wave propagation. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13010033 ↗
3. Wu, L., Zhu, L., Wu, T., Zhang, C., Sun, A., and Ju, B. (2025). Ultrasonic Evaluation Method for Mechanical Performance Degradation of Fluororubber Used in Nuclear Power Facility. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15073903 ↗
4. Namboodiri, G.N., Balasubramaniam, K., Balasubramanian, T., and Jothinathan, G. (2011, January 8–10). Studies on feasibility of ultrasonic phased array in rail inspection. Proceedings of the National Seminar & Exhibition on Non-Destructive Evaluation, Chennai, India.
5. Stress Evaluation of Railroad Forged Wheels by Ultrasonic Testing10.1520/JTE100149 ↗
6. Detection of structural damage in vibroacoustic analysis
7. Guo, J., Wang, P., Gao, X., Wang, Z., and Zhao, Q. (2012, January 8–11). Wheel rim stress detecting using ultrasonic testing technology. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Precision Engineering Measurement and Instrumentation, Chengdu, China.10.1117/12.2015008 ↗
8. Novel Wavelet Threshold Denoising Method in Axle Press-fit Zone Ultrasonic Detection10.1063/1.4974594 ↗
9. Hwang, Y.I., Kim, G., Kim, Y.I., Park, J.H., Choi, M.J., and Kim, K.B. (2021). Experimental Measurement of Residual Stress Distribution in Rail Specimens Using Ultrasonic LCR Waves. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11199306 ↗
10. Determination of residual stress in the rail wheel during quenching process by FEM simulation
11. Detection of residual stress in a railway wheel10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.126 ↗
12. Ultrasonic Velocity Ratio: An Effective Tool for In-Situ Materials Characterization10.3813/AAA.919167 ↗
13. Laser ultrasonic assessment of the ef fects of porosity and microcracking on the elastic moduli of nuclear graphites10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.015 ↗
14. Schramm, R.E. (1998). Ultrasonic Instrumentation to Measure Hoop Stress in Cast-Steel Railroad Wheel Rims. Report No. 32, Forgotten Books. NIST Technical Note 1399.10.6028/NIST.TN.1399 ↗
15. Data normalization for the continuous monitoring of a steel truss bridge: A case study from the Italian railway line
16. Pradella, M. (2026). Measurement Uncertainty: New Definition, Viewpoints, and Laboratories. Laboratories, 3.10.3390/laboratories3010004 ↗
17. New Frontiers in Measurement Uncertainty10.3390/metrology2040029 ↗
18. Measurement uncertainty10.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.082 ↗
19. Chaix, J.F., Henault, J.M., and Garnier, V. (2018). Quality, Uncertainties and Variabilities. Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation of Civil Engineering Structures, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-1-78548-229-8.50006-6 ↗
20. Ultrasonic testing of grain distortion direction in cold formed aluminium profile10.1016/j.acme.2016.11.003 ↗
21. (2021). Standard Practice for Fabricating and Checking Aluminum Alloy Ultrasonic Standard Reference Blocks (Standard No. ASTM E127).
22. (2012). Non-Destructive Testing—Ultrasonic Testing—Specification for Calibration Block No. 1 (Standard No. EN ISO 2400:2012).
23. Analysis of the couplant influence on the ultrasonic thickness measurement of the steel grade S355J010.1002/mawe.201700050 ↗