The behavior of permeable interlocking concrete pavement under different rainfall intensities and design conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the behaviour of permeable interlocking concrete pavement (PICP) in terms of water infiltration volume, surface runoff volume, and load resistance, using a specific lab apparatus, designed and manufactured as a rainfall simulator. The connecting pattern of the surface blocks is a stretcher bond pattern with a joint spacing of (5 and 10 mm) between the block pavers to be filled with a small-sized open-graded aggregate to finalise the permeable surface of joints. The adopted pattern has been examined under three rainfall intensities of (20, 40, and 60 l/min), four longitudinal slopes (0, 2, 4, and 6%), and three transverse slopes (0, 2, and 4%). The results showed that at high rainfall intensities (60 l/min), high longitudinal slopes (6%), and high transverse slopes (4%), the stretcher-bonded PICP with 5 mm spacing between the blocks infiltrates less water than the one with 10 mm. Furthermore, PICP with 5 mm spacing has higher surface runoff than PICP with 10 mm spacing at high rainfall intensities (60 l/min), high longitudinal slopes (6%), and all transverse slope percentages (0, 2, and 4%). In addition, the load resistance of stretcher-bonded PICP with 5 mm spacing between the blocks is higher than that of 10 mm at all the subjected loads in the load-deflection test. Despite the shown differences between both types of PICP, they are strongly recommended as an alternative choice for ordinary dense-graded pavement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Building and Construction Techniques Engineering, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Hillah, Iraq
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, Hillah, Iraq
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Karbala, Iraq
Department of Chemical Engineering and Petroleum Industries, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Hillah, Iraq
Technical Institute of Babylon, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University (ATU), Najaf, Iraq
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Adane Z.A. 2010 Jan 1. Estimated area of impervious parking surfaces and the potential groundwater recharge increase through permeable pavement retrofit in the Chino Basin.
2. 10.1007/978-981-16-6277-5_1510.1007/978-981-16-6277-5_15 ↗
3. ASTM C563-96 1996 Jan 1. Standard Test Method for Optimum SO3 in Hydraulic Cement Using 24-h Compressive Strength.
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.000080810.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000808 ↗
5. 10.3141/1764-0110.3141/1764-01 ↗
6. 10.3390/w1207204510.3390/w12072045 ↗
7. Hashim, TM., et al., 2022 Jun 9. An experimental comparison between different types of surface patterns of permeable interlocking concrete pavement for roadway subsurface drainage. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 9, e01227.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01227 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.susmat.2016.05.00110.1016/j.susmat.2016.05.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.05510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.055 ↗
10. 10.3141/2401-0510.3141/2401-05 ↗
11. Kumar, G.R., and Sharma, UK., 2014. Standard test methods for determination of abrasion resistance of concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 5 (2), 155–162.
12. 10.1061/9780784479162.02810.1061/9780784479162.028 ↗
13. 10.3390/su1306306010.3390/su13063060 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.catena.2018.08.03910.1016/j.catena.2018.08.039 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.finel.2006.11.00410.1016/j.finel.2006.11.004 ↗
16. 10.1007/s12205-014-0036-y10.1007/s12205-014-0036-y ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.039 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.25010.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.250 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12343810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123438 ↗
20. Sawant V. et al. PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING CONCRETE PAVEMENT: A REVIEW.
21. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.01610.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.016 ↗
22. 10.3390/su1004123110.3390/su10041231 ↗
23. Smith, D.R., 2019 Apr 1. Permeable interlocking concrete pavement [techbrief]. United States: Federal Highway Administration.Washington, DC 20590.
24. 10.1520/STP10456010.1520/STP104560 ↗
25. 10.1061/9780784413197.00810.1061/9780784413197.008 ↗
26. Yusuf, K.O., et al., 2015 Feb 2. Design and construction of a simple rainfall simulator from locally available materials. LAUTECH Journal of Engineering and Technology, 9 (1), 13–19.