Aggregate packing characterisation of cold recycled mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite its significant role in cold recycling mix design and construction process, the effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates’ gradation and physical properties are relatively less understood. The ambiguities associated with the gradation effect led to challenges in determining the best practices in gradation control and stockpile management and blending in both cold-in-place and central plant recycling operations. Therefore, the main goal of this paper is to quantify the impact of gradation changes and proportioning of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates on the packing characteristics and performance of cold recycled mixtures. Binary blends consisting of fine and coarse reclaimed asphalt pavement stockpiles were combined to obtain fourteen gradations using a volumetric aggregate proportioning technique. The compatibility of five of the most prominent binary aggregate packing models was evaluated in cold recycling application. The modified Toufar model was able to accurately predict the blend of fine and coarse aggregates that offers the optimum packing prediction. Complex modulus tests showed linear viscoelastic characteristics of the cold recycled mixtures as well as the sensitivity to the packing states. In essence, this research shows the effectiveness of applying volumetric packing principles and aggregate proportioning techniques to achieve improvements in cold recycled mixtures’ volumetric and mechanical performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0032-5910(68)80006-310.1016/0032-5910(68)80006-3 ↗
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2020. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing and provisional standards. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
3. 10.1007/BF0142298610.1007/BF01422986 ↗
4. Arizona Department of Transportation, 2021. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Transportation Contracts and Specifications Group.
5. ARRA, 2015. Basic asphalt recycling manual. Annapolis, MD: Asphalt Recycling & Reclaiming Association, US DOT Federal Highway Adminsitration.
6. Asphalt Academy, 2020. Technical guideline (TG2) : bitumen stabilised materials. Howard Place: Southern African Bitumen Association (Sabita).
7. 10.1177/036119812093150310.1177/0361198120931503 ↗
8. Cox B.C. and Howard I.L. 2015. Cold in-place recycling characterization framework and design guidance for single or multiple component binder systems.
9. 10.4324/978020303114810.4324/9780203031148 ↗
10. 10.17226/2597110.17226/25971 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000261110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002611 ↗
12. Epps J.A. 1980. State-of-the-art cold recycling. Presented at the National Seminar on Asphalt Pavement Recycling. Washington D.C.: Proceedings of the National Seminar on Asphalt Pavement Recycling Transportation Research Board National Academy of Sciences.
13. 10.1061/TACEAT.000197910.1061/TACEAT.0001979 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-1-4615-3118-0_510.1007/978-1-4615-3118-0_5 ↗
15. Furnas, C.C., 1929. Flow of gases through beds of broken solids. U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. 10.1021/ie50261a01710.1021/ie50261a017 ↗
17. Goltermann, P., Johansen, V., and Palbøl, L, 1997. Packing of aggregates: an alternative tool to determine the optimal aggregate mix. ACI Materials Journal, 94, 5.
18. Jillavenkatesa, A., Dapkunas, S.J., and Lum, L.-S.H, 2001. Particle size characterization. Washington: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
19. 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.04310.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.043 ↗
20. 10.1201/978148227205510.1201/9781482272055 ↗
21. 10.1177/036119811882193410.1177/0361198118821934 ↗
22. 10.1061/9780784480137.05810.1061/9780784480137.058 ↗
23. 10.1080/14680629.2019.163375410.1080/14680629.2019.1633754 ↗
24. 10.1177/036119811983580610.1177/0361198119835806 ↗
25. 10.17226/2490210.17226/24902 ↗
26. Sebaaly, P.E., et al., 2018. Development of mix design and structural design procedures for cold in-place recycling. Carson City: Nevada Department of Transportation.
27. 10.17226/2631910.17226/26319 ↗
28. Talbot, A.N. and Richart, F.E., 1923. The strength of concrete: its relation to the cement aggregates and water. Urbana Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
29. 10.3141/1789-1610.3141/1789-16 ↗
30. 10.3141/2267-0210.3141/2267-02 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.26410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.264 ↗