Understanding Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in Dockless Bike-Sharing: Evidence from 40 Million Trips
Source abstract
Abstract
As a key link between short-distance urban mobility and public transport, dockless bike-sharing (DBS) systems have expanded rapidly in recent years. However, existing studies are limited by insufficient factor coverage, incomplete temporal analysis, and inadequate assessment of spatial-scale effects. To address these gaps, this study uses Shenzhen as a case study, integrating 40 million DBS trip records from August 2021 with multi-source geospatial data to develop a spatiotemporal analytical framework. First, it examines differences in riding patterns between weekdays and weekends, further segmenting trips into six time periods to capture intra-day temporal variations. Through multicollinearity and spatial autocorrelation tests, a 700-m grid was identified as the optimal analysis unit. Subsequently, a Multi-scale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model quantified how multiple sources of factors collectively shape DBS usage behavior. Results indicate that higher frequency, faster speeds, and longer distances during peak periods characterize weekday trips. Office POIs and transit accessibility positively affect DBS usage during weekday peaks, whereas Residential POIs and Convenience Service POIs have a greater influence on weekend trips. Population density and land-use mix consistently promote DBS use across all periods. Younger residents (<30 years) were the main users, especially during weekday peak and weekend no-peak periods, whereas gender and education had limited impact. These findings provide empirical evidence to optimize bike-sharing deployment, enhance multimodal transport integration, and support sustainable urban mobility planning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430000, China
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. To Be or Not to Be Dockless: Empirical Analysis of Dockless Bikeshare Development in China10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.007 ↗
2. Du, M., and Cheng, L. (2018). Better Understanding the Characteristics and Influential Factors of Different Travel Patterns in Free-Floating Bike Sharing: Evidence from Nanjing, China. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10041244 ↗
3. Exploring the Impact of Built Environment Factors on the Use of Public Bikes at Bike Stations: Case Study in Zhongshan, China10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.11.014 ↗
4. How Does Our Natural and Built Environment Affect the Use of Bicycle Sharing?10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.015 ↗
5. Synergistic Effects of the Built Environment and Commuting Programs on Commute Mode Choice10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.041 ↗
6. Ridership and Effectiveness of Bikesharing: The Effects of Urban Features and System Characteristics on Daily Use and Turnover Rate of Public Bikes in China10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.06.008 ↗
7. Ma, X., Ji, Y., Jin, Y., Wang, J., and He, M. (2018). Modeling the Factors Influencing the Activity Spaces of Bikeshare around Metro Stations: A Spatial Regression Model. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10113949 ↗
8. Built Environment Effects on the Integration of Dockless Bike-Sharing and the Metro10.1016/j.trd.2020.102335 ↗
9. The Association between Travel Demand of Docked Bike-Sharing and the Built Environment: Evidence from Seven Us Cities10.1016/j.scs.2024.105325 ↗
10. A Comparison in Travel Patterns and Determinants of User Demand between Docked and Dockless Bike-Sharing Systems using Multi-Sourced Data10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.022 ↗
11. Cnn-Bilstm Hybrid Neural Networks with Attention Mechanism for Well Log Prediction10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108838 ↗
12. Intermodal Transfer between Bicycles and Rail Transit in Shanghai, China10.3141/2144-20 ↗
13. Investigation of Contributing Factors to Extremely Severe Traffic Crashes Using Survival Theory10.1080/17457300.2017.1363784 ↗
14. Potential of Transferring Car Trips to Bicycle during Winter10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00012-0 ↗
15. Urban Cycles and Mobility Patterns: Exploring and Predicting Trends in a Bicycle-Based Public Transport System10.1016/j.pmcj.2010.07.002 ↗
16. Are Bikeshare Users Different from Regular Cyclists? A First Look at Short-Term Users, Annual Members, and Area Cyclists in the Washington, DC, Region10.3141/2387-13 ↗
17. Wu, L., Zhi, Y., Sui, Z.W., and Liu, Y. (2014). Intra-Urban Human Mobility and Activity Transition: Evidence from Social Media Check-In Data. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0097010 ↗
18. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (Maup) in Physical Geography10.1177/0309133307083294 ↗
19. Spatial Aggregation Methods for Investigating the Maup Effects in Migration Analysis10.1007/s12061-018-9274-6 ↗
20. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (Maup) in the Relationship between Exposure to NO2 and Respiratory Health10.1186/1476-072X-10-58 ↗
21. The Impacts of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (Maup) on Social Equity Analysis of Public Transit Reliability10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103500 ↗
22. Du, J. (2019). The Shenzhen Experiment: The Story of China’s Instant City, Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674242227 ↗
23. Understanding the Usage of Dockless Bike Sharing in Singapore10.1080/15568318.2018.1429696 ↗
24. A Systematic Review of the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (Maup) in Community Food Environmental Research10.1007/s44212-022-00021-1 ↗
25. Mooney, P., and Minghini, M. (2017). A Review of Openstreetmap Data. Mapping and the Citizen Sensor, Ubiquity Press.
26. Environmental Benefits of Bike Sharing: A Big Data-Based Analysis10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101 ↗
27. Ols (Linear) Regression10.1002/9781119111931.ch104 ↗
28. Spatial Differences and Mul-ti-Mechanism of Carbon Footprint Based on Gwr Model in Provincial China10.1007/s11442-014-1109-z ↗
29. Oshan, T.M., Li, Z., Kang, W., Wolf, L.J., and Fotheringham, A.S. (2019). mgwr: A Python Implementation of Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression for Investigating Process Spatial Heterogeneity and Scale. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8.10.3390/ijgi8060269 ↗
30. Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (Mgwr)
31. Smoothing Parameter Selection in Nonparametric Regression Using an Improved Akaike Information Criterion10.1111/1467-9868.00125 ↗
32. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17 ↗
33. Liu, B., Cao, J., Zhou, Y., and Zhang, H. (2016, January 23–26). A Study on the Temporal-Spatial Features of Bicycle-Sharing Activities: A Case of Hangzhou. Proceedings of the Urban Plan Forum 2016, Xi’an, China.
34. Mei, S.Y., Qiao, G.M., Shao, L.X., and Wang, J. (2019). Characteristics of Public Bicycle Usage in Ningbo City Based on Big Data Mining. Bull. Surv. Mapp., 55.
35. Li, Z., Shang, Y., Zhao, G., and Yang, M. (2022). Exploring the Multiscale Relationship between the Built Environment and the Metro-Oriented Dockless Bike-Sharing Usage. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19042323 ↗
36. Bike Share’s Impact on Car Use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013 ↗
37. Evaluating Public Transit Modal Shift Dynamics in Response to Bikesharing: A Tale of Two Us Cities10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.026 ↗
38. Wu, X., Lu, Y., Lin, Y., and Yang, Y. (2019). Measuring the Destination Accessibility of Cycling Transfer Trips in Metro Station Areas: A Big Data Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16152641 ↗
39. Exploring the Relationship between Built Environment and Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Dockless Bike-Sharing Usage: A Case Study of Shenzhen, China10.1016/j.cities.2024.105504 ↗
40. A Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Model to Explore the Spatiotemporal Influence of Built Environment on Transit Ridership10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.03.001 ↗
41. Understanding Dockless Bike-Sharing Spatiotemporal Travel Patterns: Evidence from Ten Cities in China10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.102006 ↗
42. Gender Gap Generators for Bike Share Ridership: Evidence from Citi Bike System in New York City10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.02.003 ↗
43. Impact of Weather Conditions and Built Environment on Public Bikesharing Trips in Beijing10.1007/s11067-019-09465-6 ↗
44. Incorporating the Impact of Spatio-Temporal Interactions on Bicycle Sharing System Demand: A Case Study of New York Citibike System10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.008 ↗
45. Spatiotemporal Characteristics Analysis of Commuting by Shared Electric Bike: A Case Study of Ningbo, China10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132337 ↗
46. A Geographically Weighted Regression Model to Examine the Spatial Variation of the Socioeconomic and Land-Use Factors Associated with Strava Bike Activity in Austin, Texas10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102865 ↗
47. An Empirical Analysis of Dockless Bike-Sharing Utilization and Its Explanatory Factors: Case Study from Shanghai, China10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102828 ↗
48. Built Environment and Public Bike Usage for Metro Access: A Comparison of Neighborhoods in Beijing, Taipei, and Tokyo10.1016/j.trd.2018.05.007 ↗
49. How Does the Urban Built Environment Affect Dockless Bikesharing-Metro Integration Cycling? Analysis from a Nonlinear Comprehensive Perspective10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141770 ↗