The tailored traits of reclaimed asphalt pavement incorporating maltene: performance analyses
Source abstract
Abstract
Environmental issues and fluctuations in the price of asphalt binders have increased the demand in usage of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) material for asphalt mixtures. The RAP binder, nevertheless, is often highly aged and has several drawbacks, for instance, low cracking resistance, low workability, and low fatigue in the resulting mixtures. These issues can be resolved by using rejuvenators. As such, this research work assessed the engineering properties of reclaimed hot-mix asphalt (HMA) mixture rejuvenated by maltene-derived asphalt. The tests examined Marshall properties, moisture damage, resilient modulus (MR), dynamic creep, Cantabro loss, and rutting resistance, including the stripping and coating tests. The results showed that maltene had been effective in mitigating the aging effect of RAP asphalt, while the rejuvenated mixture exhibited considerable enhancement, especially when compared to the virgin and RAP mixtures without maltene. A simple cost analysis revealed that maltene was cost-effective as it compensated for the adverse effects of RAP, hence can be used to raise the content of RAP in asphalt mixture.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia
College of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Gambang, Malaysia
Funding
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
References (84)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · 2002
2. AASHTO · 2005
3. AASHTO · 2011
4. AASHTOO · 2014
5. 10.1080/10298436.2017.138850810.1080/10298436.2017.1388508 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.013 ↗
7. 10.1139/cjce-2019-063510.1139/cjce-2019-0635 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.25810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.258 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.024 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.21010.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.210 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.04.00210.1016/j.ejpe.2016.04.002 ↗
12. ASTM · 2009
13. ASTM · 2011
14. ASTM, 2012. D5404 / D5404M, Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using the rotary evaporator. Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Asphalt Mixtures.
15. ASTM, 2013. D5 / D5M, Standard test method for penetration of bituminous materials.
16. ASTM, 2014. D36 / D36M, Standard test method for softening point of bitumen (ring-and-ball apparatus). Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Asphalt Mixtures.
17. ASTM · 2014
18. ASTM, 2015. D4402/D4402M, Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Asphalt Mixtures.
19. ASTM, 2015. D6927, Standard test method for marshall stability and flow of asphalt.ixtures.
20. ASTM · 2017
21. ASTM, 2017b. D2172 / D2172M, Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of asphalt binder from asphalt mixtures. Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Asphalt Mixtures.
22. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.00410.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.004 ↗
23. 10.1080/10916466.2017.129065510.1080/10916466.2017.1290655 ↗
24. 10.1080/10916466.2017.131673810.1080/10916466.2017.1316738 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.011 ↗
26. BS EN,12697-22, 2013. Bituminous mixtures – Test methods for hot mix asphalt – Part 22: Wheel tracking.
27. BS EN, 12697-25 · 2016
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.060 ↗
29. Claine J. · Road Mater Pavement Design · 2011 · 4 · 795
30. Copeland, A., 2011. Reclaimed asphalt pavement in asphalt mixtures: state. No. FHWA-HRT-11-021. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology.
31. 10.1021/ac60273a00410.1021/ac60273a004 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11751610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117516 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10450410.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104504 ↗
34. 10.1520/JTE2014021210.1520/JTE20140212 ↗
35. 10.1617/s11527-018-1141-z10.1617/s11527-018-1141-z ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.03110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.031 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.25610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.256 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.07910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.079 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.11210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.112 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000237310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002373 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.025 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11883710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118837 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000129210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001292 ↗
44. JKR, 2008. Standard specification for road works. Section 4: Flexible Pavement. pp. S4-58-S4-69.
45. 10.3141/2633-0810.3141/2633-08 ↗
46. Kaseer F. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2018 · 87 · 513
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.28610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.286 ↗
48. 10.1080/10298436.2013.85531210.1080/10298436.2013.855312 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.16010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.160 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.19110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.191 ↗
51. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81283610.1080/14680629.2013.812836 ↗
52. 10.3141/2575-0210.3141/2575-02 ↗
53. 10.1080/14680629.2013.86882010.1080/14680629.2013.868820 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.015 ↗
55. 10.1080/10298436.2019.169646110.1080/10298436.2019.1696461 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0500410.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05004 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.042 ↗
58. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000159510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001595 ↗
59. 10.1155/2017/439795710.1155/2017/4397957 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.01210.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.012 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.21110.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.211 ↗
62. Roberts, F.L. et al., 1991. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction. 2nd edn. Napa, CA: NAPA Educational Foundation.
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.20510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.205 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.09510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.095 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.080 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.17610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.176 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.26910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.269 ↗
68. Speight J.G · 2015
69. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000169710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001697 ↗
70. 10.1139/L10-07010.1139/L10-070 ↗
71. 10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00033-210.1016/S0950-0618(01)00033-2 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.09310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.093 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.024 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11778310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117783 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.23910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.239 ↗
76. 10.1080/10298436.2018.154932310.1080/10298436.2018.1549323 ↗
77. 10.3141/2370-0310.3141/2370-03 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.007 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.20110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.201 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.10410.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.104 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.066 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.18110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.181 ↗
83. 10.1080/10916466.2018.155050510.1080/10916466.2018.1550505 ↗
84. 10.1080/10916466.2018.147148910.1080/10916466.2018.1471489 ↗