Design and Implementation of a Tourism Experimentation Platform for Context-Aware and Sustainable Recommendations
Source abstract
Abstract
The digitization of tourism has made numerous platforms available, but there remains a significant shortage of tools capable of promoting local events and activities. This study hypothesizes that a decentralized digital interface can mitigate over-tourism. We conducted an experiment by deploying a digital platform to assess the synergy between local providers and visitors through the Tourism Open-ended Experimentation Platform (TOEP), a multi-interface solution designed to directly connect tourism activity providers with residents and visitors. The platform integrates a web portal for providers and a mobile app for users, supported by a recommendation system based on individual profiles and preferences. TOEP stands out for its focus on local and sustainable tourism, facilitating the promotion of smaller events and helping to reduce the concentration of tourist flows in already saturated destinations. Initial validation, conducted with a panel of industry experts, highlighted the ease of use and good organization of the interfaces, with scores above average. Preliminary results confirm the relevance of TOEP as a tool for the sustainable and digitized promotion of local tourism, opening prospects for development towards a smart, participatory tourism ecosystem that can be replicated in different territorial contexts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Marketing and Social Media · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Conferences and Exhibitions Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, University of Torino, 10149 Torino, Italy
Inferendo s.r.l., 15121 Alessandria, Italy
Computer Science Institute, DiSIT, University of Piemonte Orientale, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
Department of Sustainable Development and Ecological Transition, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
Funding
EU
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. United Nations General Assembly (2025, September 03). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
2. European Commission (2025, September 23). Shaping Europe’s Digital Future. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en.
3. Council of the European Union (2025, September 23). Council Conclusions on a European Agenda for Tourism 2030. Available online: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15441-2022-INIT/en/pdf.
4. Mell, P., and Grance, T. (2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, Technical report.10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145 ↗
5. Application of Prospective Scenarios in Tourism Company10.1016/j.procs.2023.07.023 ↗
6. A study on shaping tourists’ conservational intentions towards cultural heritage in the digital era: Exploring the effects of authenticity, cultural experience, and place attachment10.1080/13467581.2024.2321999 ↗
7. Karimov, N., and Khujanazarova, N. (2022, January 15–16). Digital Economy in Tourism Industry. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems, New York, NY, USA. ICFNDS ’21.10.1145/3508072.3508228 ↗
8. Enhancing sustainable development through tourism digitalisation: A systematic literature review10.1007/s40558-022-00241-w ↗
9. Sustainable Tourism Industry Development: A Collaborative Model of Open Innovation, Stakeholders, and Support System Facilities10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3301574 ↗
10. Piras, F., and Pedes, F. (2025). The Impact of Socio-Economic Factors on the Development of Rural Tourism: Italian Case Based on a Regional Analysis. Tour. Hosp., 6.10.3390/tourhosp6010003 ↗
11. Dimensions of Smart Tourism and Its Levels: An Integrative Literature Review10.52255/smarttourism.2022.2.1.2 ↗
12. Past, present, and future of virtual tourism-a literature review
13. Smart tourism: State of the art and literature review for the last six years10.1016/j.array.2020.100020 ↗
14. A Hybrid Method for Recommendation Systems based on Tourism with an Evolutionary Algorithm and Topsis Model10.1080/16168658.2021.2019430 ↗
15. Intelligent recommendation model of tourist places based on collaborative filtering and user preferences10.1080/08839514.2023.2203574 ↗
16. Tourism recommendation system: A survey and future research directions10.1007/s11042-022-12167-w ↗
17. LOOKER: A mobile, personalized recommender system in the tourism domain based on social media user-generated content10.1007/s00779-018-01194-w ↗
18. Personalized Attraction Recommendation System for Tourists Through Check-In Data10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2778293 ↗
19. Prototyping and usability evaluation of mobile-based-application for accessible tourism market: The view of tourism demand10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.174 ↗
20. TouristGo: A location-based mobile game to improve tourist experience by visiting path optimisation
21. A digital humanism view on e-tourism10.1007/s40558-022-00237-6 ↗
22. From physical to virtual: Redefining space in the age of the Metaverse
23. Role of geographical information systems in tourism decision making process: A review10.1007/s40558-015-0025-0 ↗
24. OurSCARA: Awareness-Based Recommendation Services for Sustainable Tourism10.3390/world5020024 ↗
25. A recommender-based web platform to boost tourism in marginal territories10.1007/s40558-025-00327-1 ↗
26. Nunes, J., Mata, D., Ribeiro, F., and Metrôlho, J. (2025). Digital Platforms to Promote Sustainable and Authentic Tourism in Low-Density Territories of Southern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17136156 ↗
27. Smart tourism technologies per la fruizione dei territori: I portali per l’ospitalità turistica alternativa
28. (2025, September 23). One Planet Sustainable Tourism Programme One Planet Vision for a Responsible Recovery of the Touris Sector. Available online: https://bit.ly/one_planet_vision_ricovery.
29. European Commission, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (2022). Transition Pathway for Tourism, Publications Office of the European Union.
30. European Commission (2025, September 23). The European Green Deal. 2019. Communication from the Commission, COM(2019) 640 Final. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52019DC0640.
31. Ionic (2025, July 29). Ionic Framework. Available online: https://ionicframework.com/.
32. Google LLC., and Team Angular (2025, September 29). Angular: The Modern Web Developer’s Platform. Available online: https://angular.dev/.
33. MongoDB, Inc. (2025, July 29). MongoDB. Available online: https://www.mongodb.com.
34. (2025, July 29). OpenJS Foundation Node.js. Available online: https://nodejs.org/.
35. Keahey, K., Anderson, J., Zhen, Z., Riteau, P., Ruth, P., Stanzione, D., Cevik, M., Colleran, J., Gunawi, H.S., and Hammock, C. (2020). Lessons Learned from the Chameleon Testbed. Proceedings of the 2020 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC ’20), USENIX Association.
36. Google (2025, July 29). Firebase Documentation. Available online: https://firebase.google.com/.
37. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., and Shapira, B. (2022). Advances in collaborative filtering. Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer.10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4 ↗
38. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., and Shapira, B. (2022). Semantics and Content-Based Recommendations. Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer.10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4 ↗
39. Google (2025, July 29). Gemini API. Available online: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs.
40. Günther, M., Milliken, L., Geuter, J., Mastrapas, G., Wang, B., and Xiao, H. (2023). Jina embeddings: A novel set of high-performance sentence embedding models. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2023.nlposs-1.2 ↗
41. A probabilistic justification for using tf× idf term weighting in information retrieval10.1007/s007999900025 ↗
42. Kishida, K. (2005). Property of Average Precision and Its Generalization: An Examination of Evaluation Indicator for Information Retrieval Experiments, National Institute of Informatics.
43. Baker, O., and Yuan, Q. (2021, January 17–19). Machine learning: Factorization machines and normalized discounted cumulative gain for tourism recommender system optimisation. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Computing (ICOCO), Virtual.10.1109/ICOCO53166.2021.9673502 ↗
44. Chapelle, O., Metlzer, D., Zhang, Y., and Grinspan, P. (2009, January 2–6). Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Hong Kong, China.10.1145/1645953.1646033 ↗
45. Siroker, D., and Koomen, P. (2015). A/B Testing: The Most Powerful Way to Turn Clicks Into Customers, John Wiley & Sons. [1st ed.].
46. Milano, C., Cheer, J.M., and Novelli, M. (2019). Overtourism: Excesses, Discontents and Measures in Travel and Tourism, CABI.10.1079/9781786399823.0000 ↗
47. Koens, K., Postma, A., and Papp, B. (2018). Is overtourism overused? Understanding the impact of tourism in a city context. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10124384 ↗
48. Smart tourism: Foundations and developments10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8 ↗
49. Lops, P., De Gemmis, M., and Semeraro, G. (2010). Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends. Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_3 ↗
50. Intelligent tourism recommender systems: A survey10.1016/j.eswa.2014.06.007 ↗
51. Measuring usability with the use questionnaire12
52. Nielsen, J., and Landauer, T.K. (1993, January 24–29). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/169059.169166 ↗
53. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990, January 1–5). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1145/97243.97281 ↗
54. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough?10.1177/001872089203400407 ↗