Pavement damage costs by truck class and economy of scale relative to increased loading
Source abstract
Abstract
This research quantified the impact that truck mix, distress severity, and climate have on pavement damage and maintenance costs based on Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) sections. Cost analysis was conducted using in-situ records of maintenance and rehabilitation data from 1988 to 2016. The paper quantified damage cost per VMT and ESAL-mile for each FHWA truck class. Economies of scale are evident in the cost per ESAL-mile relative to total pavement loading as segments carrying higher traffic loads require additional maintenance and rehabilitation, however additional cost for these procedures is outpaced by the increase in traffic resulting in a reduction in the pavement damage cost per ESAL-mile. The cost per ESAL-mile varied from $0.01 to $0.37 per ESAL-mile depending on total loading, a relationship that is accurately modeled (R2 = 0.97) using the developed power function. Results also show that vehicle class, and thereby the number and distribution of ESALs, significantly impacts the pavement damage cost. The research developed an accurate and robust model correlating pavement damage cost per ESAL-mile to the accumulated number of ESALs during the pavement service life. Transportation agencies can utilize this model to determine a fair variable compensation for the pavement damage imposed by individual trucks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Transport Systems and Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering Department, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada
Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Manhattan College, New York, NY, USA
Funding
Memorial University of Newfoundland
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Adlinge S. S. · Journal of Mechanical & Civil Engineering · 2009 · 9
2. Agbelie B. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2597. Transportation Research Board · 2016 · 2016 · 110.3141/2597-01 ↗
3. 10.1080/15732479.2014.93595010.1080/15732479.2014.935950 ↗
4. 10.1680/tran.12.0007510.1680/tran.12.00075 ↗
5. Alberta Transportation, Unit Price Averages Reports, 2013. Available from: http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/docType257/Production/UnitPriceList.pdf [Accessed July 5, 2019].
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000015010.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000150 ↗
7. Bai, Y., Schrock, S. D. & Mulinazzi, T. E. 2010. Estimating Highway Pavement Costs Attributed to Truck Traffic. Report No. MATC-KU:262, Mid-America Transportation Center, University of Kansas. Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1054&context=matcreports [Accessed July 9, 2019].
8. 10.3141/2478-1110.3141/2478-11 ↗
9. Bektas, F., Smadi, O., and Al-Zoubi, M, 2014. Pavement management performance modeling: Evaluating the Existing PCI Equations. Iowa State University. 12-2014. Available from: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/intrans_reports/100. Publication InTrans.
10. Caltrans, 2017. Price index for selected highway construction items price index for selected highway construction items. California Department of Transportation. Available from: http://ppmoe.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/oe/cost_index/historical_reports/CCI_1QTR_2017.pdf Accessed July 01 2019.
11. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
12. Carvalho, R. et al., 2011. Impact of design features on pavement response and performance in rehabilitated flexible and rigid pavements. Publication FHWA-HRT-10-066. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation.
13. 10.3141/2066-1010.3141/2066-10 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.11910.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.119 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000037810.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000378 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000040910.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000409 ↗
17. ECONorthwest · 2009
18. ECONorthwest · 2011
19. Elkins G. · 2018
20. Feighan K. · 1986
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1988)114:5(539)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1988)114:5(539) ↗
22. Gibby R. · Transportation Research Record · 1990 · 1262 · 48
23. 10.1007/s11367-011-0375-610.1007/s11367-011-0375-6 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000081810.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000818 ↗
25. 10.3141/2235-0610.3141/2235-06 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000032310.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000323 ↗
27. Karamihas, S. Profile analysis of the LTPP SPS-5 Site in Arizona. Report No. UMTRI- 2008-6, 2008. University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
28. 10.1515/otmcj-2016-000810.1515/otmcj-2016-0008 ↗
29. Long- Term Pavement Performance database, InfoPave, L. T. P. P. 2019. Standard data release. Available from: https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/ [Accessed October 7, 2019].
30. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89331810.1080/10298436.2014.893318 ↗
31. 10.1061/9780784413586.02610.1061/9780784413586.026 ↗
32. 10.1080/14680629.2016.119714410.1080/14680629.2016.1197144 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000057110.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000571 ↗
34. Perera, R. W. & Kohn, S. D. 2006. Ride quality performance of asphalt concrete pavements subjected to different rehabilitation strategies. In Airfield and Highway Pavement: Meeting Today’s Challenges with Emerging Technologies, 789–800.10.1061/40838(191)67 ↗
35. Rangaraju P. · 2008
36. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.02510.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.025 ↗
37. Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and Paterson, D.O, 1996. Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements. World Bank Technical Paper Number 46.
38. 10.3141/2154-1910.3141/2154-19 ↗
39. Vitaliano D. F. · Quarterly Review of Economics and Business · 1990 · 30 · 32
40. Volovski M. · 2015
41. Volovski M. · ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems · 2017 · 143 · 11
42. Walls, J., and Smith, III, and R, M., 1998. Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design: Interim technical bulletin. Rep. No. FHWA-SA-98-079, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
43. 10.1061/9780784479216.06010.1061/9780784479216.060 ↗