Comparison of Mechanical Hurdle-Resisted, Sled-Resisted and Standard Sprint Training in U18 Female Hurdlers: A Preliminary Randomized Trial
Source abstract
Abstract
To compare hurdle-resisted sprint training (EGH), sled-resisted training (EGS), and hurdles-only training (CG) on performance and kinematics using a smallest-effect-size-of-interest (SESOI) framework, fifteen U18 female hurdlers (16.3 ± 1.3 years) were randomized to EGH, EGS, or CG (n = 5 each) for a 7-week intervention (7 microcycles). EGH used individualized resistance (10% velocity decrement), while EGS used fixed ~13% body-mass resistance. Outcomes included 30 m hurdle time (30 mH), Technique Index, and exploratory kinematics. Primary analysis used baseline-adjusted robust ANCOVA with permutation and linear mixed models (LMM) as sensitivity checks. A smallest-effect-size-of-interest (SESOI) of −0.066 s (~1.2%) was pre-specified. Adjusted ANCOVA favored EGH over CG (−0.19 s; 95% CI [−0.45, 0.06]; p = 0.11). The point estimate exceeded the SESOI, though the CI captured both meaningful and trivial effects. Sensitivity analyses maintained this directional pattern, but LMM estimates varied in magnitude, suggesting model dependence. The EGH–EGS contrast was smaller and uncertain (−0.15 s; p = 0.10). Exploratory baseline-adjusted kinematic contrasts showed no clear differences at the first hurdle, but highlighted nominal differences in the EGH group at the second hurdle (greater take-off distance, p = 0.030) and third hurdle (shorter flight and landing times, p < 0.05), which should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. In this preliminary trial, the data are compatible with a range of effects from negligible to practically meaningful for hurdle-resisted sprint training relative to both control and sled-resisted conditions. All estimates are accompanied by wide compatibility intervals, precluding confirmatory conclusions. These findings establish protocol feasibility, provide estimation-based preliminary evidence with openly available individual-level data, and motivate adequately powered multi-center replication trials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Dafni, 17237 Athens, Greece
Department of Health Sciences and Clinical Practice, College of Health Professions and Medical Science, Barry University, Miami Shores, FL 33161, USA
Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport Science at Thessaloniki, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Hanley, B., Walker, J., Paradisis, G.P., Merlino, S., and Bissas, A. (2021). Biomechanics of world-class men and women hurdlers. Front. Sports Act. Living, 3.10.3389/fspor.2021.704308 ↗
2. Efficiency factors in 110-metre hurdle clearance techniques: Kinematics among specialist hurdlers and decathletes10.5114/hm.2024.136058 ↗
3. Bissas, A., Paradisis, G.P., Hanley, B., Merlino, S., and Walker, J. (2022). Kinematic and temporal differences between world-class men’s and women’s hurdling techniques. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4.10.3389/fspor.2022.873547 ↗
4. González-Frutos, P., Veiga, S., Mallo, J., and Navarro, E. (2020). Evolution of the Hurdle-Unit Kinematic Parameters in the 60 m Indoor Hurdle Race. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217807 ↗
5. Race pattern of men’s 110-m hurdles: Time analysis of Olympic hurdle performance10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.5n.3p.56 ↗
6. Relationships between the technique index and performance in 60-m hurdle indoor races in elite male heptathletes
7. Analysis of hurdle running at various inter-hurdle distances in an elementary school PE class10.5432/ijshs.20090027 ↗
8. Ozaki, Y., and Ueda, T. (2022). Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4.10.3389/fspor.2022.822592 ↗
9. Tønnessen, E., Svendsen, I.S., Olsen, I.C., Guttormsen, A., and Haugen, T. (2015). Performance development in adolescent track and field athletes according to age, sex and sport discipline. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0129014 ↗
10. Bezuglov, E., Achkasov, E., Vakhidov, T., Malyakin, G., Kapralova, E., Kolesnichenko, V., Vinogradov, M., Zharikova, T., and Emanov, A. (2024). Gender Differences and Performance Changes in Sprinting and Long Jump Among Young Athletes. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12120347 ↗
11. Balcarova, B., and Pedersen, A.V. (2025). The development of the performance sex gap in track-and-field events across the lifespan. Front. Sports Act. Living, 7.10.3389/fspor.2025.1659762 ↗
12. Age and Sex Differences in Physical Performance Among Adolescent Team Sport Athletes10.1002/ejsc.12284 ↗
13. Gender and event specificity differences in kinematical parameters of a 60 m hurdles race10.1080/24748668.2020.1776064 ↗
14. Optimal mechanical force-velocity profile for sprint acceleration performance10.1111/sms.14097 ↗
15. Bezodis, I.N., Brazil, A., von Lieres Und Wilkau, H.C., Wood, M.A., Paradisis, G.P., Hanley, B., Tucker, C.B., Pollitt, L., Merlino, S., and Vazel, P.J. (2019). World-Class Male Sprinters and High Hurdlers Have Similar Start and Initial Acceleration Techniques. Front. Sports Act. Living, 1.10.3389/fspor.2019.00023 ↗
16. Resisted Sled Sprint Training to Improve Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review10.1007/s40279-015-0422-8 ↗
17. The Effect of Resisted Sprint Training on Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
18. Effects of resisted sled training on sprint performance in team sports. A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.032 ↗
19. Optimal Loading for Maximizing Power During Sled-Resisted Sprinting10.1123/ijspp.2016-0362 ↗
20. Osterwald, K.M., Kelly, D.T., Comyns, T.M., and Catháin, C.Ó (2021). Resisted Sled Sprint Kinematics: The Acute Effect of Load and Sporting Population. Sports, 9.10.3390/sports9100137 ↗
21. Cahill, M.J., Oliver, J.L., Cronin, J.B., Clark, K.P., Cross, M.R., and Lloyd, R.S. (2019). Sled-Pull Load–Velocity Profiling and Implications for Sprint Training Prescription in Young Male Athletes. Sports, 7.10.3390/sports7050119 ↗
22. Effect of Different Sprint Training Methods on Sprint Performance Over Various Distances: A Brief Review10.1519/JSC.0000000000001245 ↗
23. The Longitudinal Effects of Resisted and Assisted Sprint Training on Sprint Kinematics, Acceleration, and Maximum Velocity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.1186/s40798-024-00777-7 ↗
24. Ghigiarelli, J.J., Ferrara, K.J., Yang, Y., Abrechsten, J.D., Barat, V.M., Sell, K.M., and Gonzalez, A.M. (2023). Quantification of horizontal force for the EXER-GENIE® resisted sprint training device. Front. Sports Act. Living, 5.10.3389/fspor.2023.1231371 ↗
25. Validity and Reliability of a Motorized Sprint Resistance Device10.1519/JSC.0000000000003830 ↗
26. Sašek, M., Cvjetičanin, O., and Šarabon, N. (2024). The validity and reliability of a hydraulic resistance device for assessing resisted sprint time. Front. Sports Act. Living, 6.10.3389/fspor.2024.1386882 ↗
27. Coping With the “Small Sample-Small Relevant Effects” Dilemma in Elite Sport Research10.1123/ijspp.2021-0467 ↗
28. Introducing a new “Preliminary Report” submission category for small-sample intervention studies: Rationale and instructions10.1080/24733938.2025.2580319 ↗
29. (2025, November 14). Improving Your Statistical Inferences by D. Lakens. Available online: https://lakens.github.io/statistical_inferences/.
30. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: Potential barriers to replicability10.1080/02640414.2023.2269357 ↗
31. Anthropometric linear measurements of female athletes in the Italian national athletic teams10.4067/S0717-95022022000300657 ↗
32. Adolescent skinfold thickness is a better predictor of high body fatness in adults than is body mass index: The Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study10.1093/ajcn/85.6.1533 ↗
33. Narrative review: The role of circadian rhythm on sports performance, hormonal regulation, immune system function, and injury prevention in athletes10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19636 ↗
34. Recovery kinetics following sprint training: Resisted versus unresisted sprints10.1007/s00421-023-05317-x ↗
35. World Athletics (2025, December 03). Competition Rules & Technical Rules (Book C: C1.1 & C2.1) [PDF]. Available online: https://worldathletics.org/download/download?filename=89292580-aaca-4ea3-9c96-f4d05afb1bf8.pdf&urlslug=C1.1+%26+C2.1+-+Competition+Rules+%26+Technical+Rules.
36. Target constraints influence locomotion pattern to the first hurdle10.1123/mc.2021-0042 ↗
37. Crossing the Golden Training Divide: The Science and Practice of Training World-Class 800- and 1500-m Runners10.1007/s40279-021-01481-2 ↗
38. Effect of lower body explosive power on sprint time in a sled-towing exercise10.1016/j.scispo.2013.02.004 ↗
39. Impact of Sled Loads on Performance and Kinematics of Elite Sprinters and Rugby Players10.1123/ijspp.2020-0867 ↗
40. Effects of resisted sled towing on sprint kinematics in field-sport athletes
41. Using anchor-based methods to determine the smallest effect size of interest10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104159 ↗
42. Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: A narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field10.1098/rsos.220946 ↗
43. DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial10.1136/bmj.k3750 ↗
44. Distribution Theory for Glass’s Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators10.3102/10769986006002107 ↗
45. How 1% performance improvements led to Olympic gold
46. Loturco, I., Winckler, C., Kobal, R., Cal Abad, C.C., Kitamura, K., Veríssimo, A.W., Pereira, L.A., and Nakamura, F.Y. (2015). Performance changes and relationship between vertical jump measures and actual sprint performance in elite sprinters with visual impairment throughout a Parapan American games training season. Front. Physiol., 6.10.3389/fphys.2015.00323 ↗
47. Competitive performance of elite track-and-field athletes: Variability and smallest worthwhile enhancements
48. Sample size estimation revisited10.1080/02640414.2025.2499403 ↗
49. Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research10.1080/02640414.2020.1776002 ↗
50. ANCOVA versus change score for the analysis of two-wave data10.1080/00220973.2023.2246187 ↗
51. Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123 ↗
52. Corrigendum: Small Sample Methods for Cluster-Robust Variance Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Fixed Effects Models10.1080/07350015.2023.2174123 ↗
53. Blanca, M.J., Arnau, J., Garcia-Castro, F.J., Alarcon, R., and Bono, R. (2023). Repeated measures ANOVA and adjusted F-tests when sphericity is violated: Which procedure is best?. Front. Psychol., 14.10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192453 ↗
54. Causal inference with observational data: The need for triangulation of evidence10.1017/S0033291720005127 ↗
55. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme410.18637/jss.v067.i01 ↗
56. Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y ↗
57. Lenth, R.V. (2025, November 27). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. In (Version Latest) Comprehensive R Archive Network. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf.
58. Lovric, M. (2025). Nonparametric models for ANOVA and ANCOVA designs. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, Springer.
59. Is the effect large enough to matter? Why exercise physiologists should interpret effect sizes meaningfully: A reply to Williams et al. (2023)10.1113/JP285901 ↗
60. Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research10.1007/s40279-025-02201-w ↗
61. performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models10.21105/joss.03139 ↗
62. Bartosz-Jeffries, M., Loturco, I., Zając, A., Maszczyk, A., Freitas, T.T., Alcaraz, P.E., Pereira, L.A., and Gołaś, A. (2025). Neuromuscular and Performance Responses to Resisted Sprint Loads in Elite Female Sprinters. Sports, 13.10.3390/sports13090327 ↗
63. The winner’s curse: Why large effect sizes in discovery trials always get smaller and often disappear completely10.1111/anae.16161 ↗
64. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies10.1037/met0000025 ↗
65. The significance filter, the winner’s curse and the need to shrink10.1111/stan.12241 ↗
66. Yang, Y., Sanchez-Tojar, A., O’Dea, R.E., Noble, D.W.A., Koricheva, J., Jennions, M.D., Parker, T.H., Lagisz, M., and Nakagawa, S. (2023). Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biol., 21.10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y ↗
67. Calculating sample size for reliability studies10.1002/pmrj.12850 ↗
68. The bias for statistical significance in sport and exercise medicine10.1016/j.jsams.2023.03.002 ↗
69. A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): Explanation and elaboration
70. The importance of clinical importance when determining the target difference in sample size calculations10.1186/s13063-023-07532-5 ↗
71. Simulation-Based Power Analyses for the Smallest Effect Size of Interest: A Confidence-Interval Approach for Minimum-Effect and Equivalence Testing
72. Mixed-effects model: A useful statistical tool for longitudinal and cluster studies
73. West, B.T., Welch, K.B., and Galecki, A.T. (2022). Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software, Chapman and Hall/CRC. [3rd ed.].10.1201/9781003181064 ↗
74. Beyond t test and ANOVA: Applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.030 ↗
75. Zhang, X., and Hedeker, D. (2023). Detecting influential subjects in intensive longitudinal data using mixed-effects location scale models. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 23.10.1186/s12874-023-02046-9 ↗
76. Design and Analysis of N-Of-1 Trials That Incorporate Sequential Monitoring10.1002/sim.70177 ↗
77. Squat Jump Training at Maximal Power Loads vs. Heavy Loads: Effect on Sprint Ability10.1519/JSC.0b013e318187458a ↗
78. Interpreting magnitude of change in strength and conditioning: Effect size selection, threshold values and Bayesian updating10.1080/02640414.2022.2128548 ↗
79. Whittle, R., Ensor, J., Archer, L., Collins, G.S., Dhiman, P., Denniston, A., Alderman, J., Legha, A., van Smeden, M., and Moons, K.G. (2025). Extended sample size calculations for evaluation of prediction models using a threshold for classification. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 25.10.1186/s12874-025-02592-4 ↗
80. Espregueira-Mendes, J., Karlsson, J., Musahl, V., and Ayeni, O.R. (2024). Calculation of Statistical Power and Sample Size. Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-65430-6 ↗
81. How to build up big team science: A practical guide for large-scale collaborations10.1098/rsos.230235 ↗
82. Build up big-team science10.1038/d41586-022-00150-2 ↗