Quantitative Assessment of Human Error Effects on Evacuation Performance in Underground Stations Using a Node–Link Simulation Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Human error in evacuation guidance systems can significantly affect evacuation performance, particularly in complex underground environments where large numbers of occupants are concentrated. While previous studies have focused on optimizing evacuation routes and modeling crowd dynamics, the direct quantitative impact of human error in evacuation guidance has not been sufficiently addressed. This study aims to evaluate the effects of human error on evacuation efficiency in underground stations using a node–link-based evacuation model. A virtual three-level underground station was modeled, and evacuation simulations were conducted using two representative pathfinding algorithms, Dijkstra and A*, to compare classical and heuristic routing approaches under both normal and error conditions. Three scenarios were considered: a normal condition with accurate guidance, a misguidance scenario with incorrect information on exit availability, and a delayed evacuation scenario in which a subset of evacuees started evacuation later than others. In addition, congestion effects were incorporated by adjusting walking speeds based on crowd density. The results show that human error significantly increases evacuation time and alters congestion patterns. Compared to the normal condition, the misguidance scenario increased evacuation time by approximately 17.6%, while the delayed evacuation scenario resulted in an increase of up to 37.9%, indicating that delayed response has the most critical impact due to the interaction between late-starting evacuees and existing congestion. Although the A* algorithm demonstrated higher computational efficiency, its advantage did not consistently translate into improved evacuation performance under dynamic conditions. These findings highlight that evacuation performance is highly sensitive to the accuracy and timing of evacuation guidance, rather than being determined solely by optimal pathfinding. Therefore, improving the reliability and timeliness of evacuation guidance systems is essential for enhancing safety in underground environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Safety and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
e-umtech Inc., 123 Beolmal-ro, Dongan-gu, Anyang-si 14056, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs10.1007/BF01386390 ↗
2. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136 ↗
3. A conflict-based path-generation heuristic for evacuation planning
4. Bi, H., and Gelenbe, E. (2019). A survey of algorithms and systems for evacuating people in confined spaces. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8060711 ↗
5. Lim, G.J., Baharnemati, M.R., Zangeneh, S., and Parsaei, H.R. A Network Flow Based Optimization Approach for Hurricane Evacuation Planning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Value Chain Sustainability (ICOVACS), Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253456889_A_network_flow_based_optimization_approach_for_hurricane_evacuation_planning.
6. Scalable evacuation routing in a dynamic environment10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.08.011 ↗
7. A systematic review of methodologies for human behavior modelling and routing optimization10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104638 ↗
8. Network flow models for evacuation planning10.3126/jie.v13i1.20353 ↗
9. Xiong, Q., Zhu, Q., Du, Z., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Niu, L., and Zhou, Y. (2017). A dynamic indoor field model for emergency evacuation simulation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 6.10.3390/ijgi6040104 ↗
10. Dubey, R.K., Sohn, S.S., Hoelscher, C., and Kapadia, M. (2020). Cognitive agent-based simulation model for disaster response. arXiv.
11. Prediction and prevention of crowd-crush accidents using crowd-density simulation10.1007/s42452-024-06451-7 ↗
12. Simulation investigation on crowd evacuation strategies for vulnerable pedestrians10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103479 ↗
13. Optimal additional evacuation route analysis in deep underground station structures using Dijkstra’s algorithm10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100784 ↗
14. Kim, H., Haam, S., Yoo, M., and Song, W.S. (2026). Algorithmic evaluation of fire evacuation efficiency under dynamic crowd and smoke conditions. Fire, 9.10.3390/fire9010032 ↗
15. Agent-based simulation for pedestrian evacuation: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104705 ↗
16. CellEVAC: An adaptive guidance system for crowd evacuation
17. Liu, X., Zhou, T., Kang, H., Ma, J., Wang, Z., Huang, J., Weng, W., Lai, Y.-K., and Li, K. (2025). RESCUE: Crowd evacuation simulation via controlling SDM-united characters. arXiv.
18. Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies
19. Kuligowski, E.D. (2016). Modeling Human Behavior During Building Fires, NIST. NIST Technical Note.
20. A model of the decision-making process during evacuation10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.07.001 ↗
21. Developing a revised social force model for earthquake emergency evacuation in underground structures10.1080/19475705.2020.1724202 ↗
22. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2022). Design Guidelines for Urban Railway Stations and Transfer Facilities (Notice No. 2022-78), MOLIT.