Language Twin: A Shared-State Architecture for Terminology-Consistent Document Translation with Human-Edit Propagation: A Pilot Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based document translation systems typically treat each segment independently, discarding terminology decisions, human corrections, and discourse cues after each generation step. This stateless approach causes terminology inconsistency across segments, failure to propagate approved post-edits downstream, and redundant prompt-token consumption. Existing solutions—document-level MT, retrieval-augmented generation, and computer-assisted translation (CAT) tools as a general category—address individual aspects but lack a unified, state-aware architecture with provenance, update rules, and rollback semantics. We propose Language Twin, a shared-state architecture that organizes translation projects into seven versioned layers (L0–L6), supporting selective context loading, scoped human-edit propagation, and reversible updates. A pilot study translated three curated English-to-Korean document bundles (17 segments) using GPT-4o with a temperature of 0.3. The Language Twin condition (P1) achieved numerically higher preferred-term accuracy than the strongest baseline (17/21 vs. 14/21; not statistically significant at this sample size) and showed no repeated downstream errors in the monitored set (0/5 vs. 5/5 against the propagation-disabled ablation; Fisher’s exact test: p = 0.008), while reducing prompt tokens by 39.2% relative to full-context loading (A4). In blinded human evaluation (quadratic-weighted κ = 0.71–0.78), P1 achieved the highest terminology rating (4.38/5 vs. 3.97/5) and lowest post-editing time (16.9 s vs. 19.1 s per segment). These pilot-scale results indicate that governed shared state can improve terminology consistency and editing efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Language Processing Techniques · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Topic Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of AI Policy and Strategy, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), 123 Cheomdangwagi-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61005, Republic of Korea
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention Is All You Need. Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Long Beach, CA, USA.
2. Hendy, A., Abdelrehim, M., Sharaf, A., Raunak, V., Gabr, M., Matsushita, H., Kim, Y.J., Afify, M., and Awadalla, H.H. (2023). How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation. arXiv.
3. An Electrified Railway Catenary Component Anomaly Detection Framework Based on Invariant Normal Region Prototype with Segment Anything Model10.1109/TTE.2025.3628607 ↗
4. Multi-Modal Imitation Learning for Arc Detection in Complex Railway Environments
5. A Survey on Document-Level Neural Machine Translation: Methods and Evaluation10.1145/3441691 ↗
6. Maruf, S., and Haffari, G. (2018, January 15–20). Document Context Neural Machine Translation with Memory Networks. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Melbourne, Australia.10.18653/v1/P18-1118 ↗
7. Sugiyama, A., and Yoshinaga, N. (2021, January 6–11). Context-aware Decoder for Neural Machine Translation using a Target-side Document-Level Language Model. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2021, Online.10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.461 ↗
8. Lyu, X., Li, J., Gong, Z., and Zhang, M. (2021, January 7–11). Encouraging Lexical Translation Consistency for Document-Level Neural Machine Translation. Proceedings of the EMNLP 2021, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Online.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.262 ↗
9. Hong, H., Xie, Y., Zheng, J., and Wang, X. (2025). SubDocTrans: Enhancing Document-level Machine Translation with Plug-and-play Multi-granularity Knowledge Augmentation. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, Suzhou, China, November 2025, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.782 ↗
10. Dinu, G., Mathur, P., Federico, M., and Al-Onaizan, Y. (August, January 28). Training Neural Machine Translation to Apply Terminology Constraints. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Florence, Italy.
11. Post, M., and Vilar, D. (2018, January 1–6). Fast Lexically Constrained Decoding with Dynamic Beam Allocation for Neural Machine Translation. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/N18-1119 ↗
12. Hasler, E., de Gispert, A., Iglesias, G., and Byrne, B. (2018, January 1–6). Neural Machine Translation Decoding with Terminology Constraints. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2018, Volume 2 (Short Papers), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.18653/v1/N18-2081 ↗
13. Zhang, H., Wang, Q., Qin, B., Shi, Z., Wang, H., and Chen, M. (2023, January 9–14). Understanding and Improving the Robustness of Terminology Constraints in Neural Machine Translation. Proceedings of the ACL 2023, Toronto, ON, Canada.
14. Ghazvininejad, M., Gonen, H., and Zettlemoyer, L. (2023). Dictionary-based Phrase-level Prompting of Large Language Models for Machine Translation. arXiv.
15. Continuous Learning from Human Post-Edits for Neural Machine Translation10.1515/pralin-2017-0023 ↗
16. Ki, D., and Carpuat, M. (2024). Guiding Large Language Models to Post-Edit Machine Translation with Error Annotations. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024, Mexico City, Mexico, June 2024, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.265 ↗
17. Koneru, S., Exel, M., Huck, M., and Niehues, J. (2024, January 16–21). Contextual Refinement of Translations: Large Language Models for Sentence and Document-Level Post-Editing. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2024, Mexico City, Mexico.10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.148 ↗
18. Chen, P., Guo, Z., Haddow, B., and Heafield, K. (2024, January 24–27). Iterative Translation Refinement with Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, Sheffield, UK.
19. Bulte, B., and Tezcan, A. (August, January 28). Neural Fuzzy Repair: Integrating Fuzzy Matches into Neural Machine Translation. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Florence, Italy.
20. Mu, Y., Reheman, A., Cao, Z., Fan, Y., Li, B., Li, Y., Xiao, T., Zhang, C., and Zhu, J. (2023). Augmenting Large Language Model Translators via Translation Memories. Findings of ACL 2023, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 2023, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.653 ↗
21. Hou, R., Liu, H., and Lepage, Y. (2024, January 7–9). Leveraging Knowledge from Translation Memory for Globally and Locally Guiding Neural Machine Translation. Proceedings of the 38th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Tokyo, Japan.
22. Moslem, Y., Haque, R., Kelleher, J.D., and Way, A. (2023, January 12–15). Adaptive Machine Translation with Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, Tampere, Finland.
23. Li, C., Zhang, M., Liu, X., Li, Z., Wong, D., and Zhang, M. (2024). Towards Demonstration-Aware Large Language Models for Machine Translation. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, August 2024, Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.824 ↗
24. Anastasopoulos, A., Cattelan, A., Dou, Z.-Y., Federico, M., Federmann, C., Genzel, D., Guzman, F., Hu, J., Hughes, M., and Koehn, P. (2020, January 20). TICO-19: The Translation Initiative for COVID-19. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for COVID-19 at EMNLP 2020, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcovid19-2.5 ↗
25. Tiedemann, J. (2012, January 23–25). Parallel Data, Tools and Interfaces in OPUS. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), Istanbul, Turkey.
26. Rei, R., Stewart, C., Farinha, A.C., and Lavie, A. (2020, January 16–20). COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation. Proceedings of the EMNLP 2020, Online.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.213 ↗
27. xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detection10.1162/tacl_a_00683 ↗
28. Rei, R., Guerreiro, N.M., Pombal, J., van Stigt, D., Treviso, M., Coheur, L., de Souza, J.G.C., and Martins, A.F.T. (2023, January 6–7). Scaling up CometKiwi: Unbabel-IST 2023 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task. Proceedings of the WMT 2023, Singapore.10.18653/v1/2023.wmt-1.73 ↗
29. Exploring Human-Like Translation Strategy with Large Language Models10.1162/tacl_a_00642 ↗
30. Lee, D., Ahn, J., Park, H., and Jo, J. (2021, January 1–6). IntelliCAT: Intelligent Machine Translation Post-Editing with Quality Estimation and Translation Suggestion. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 59th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (ACL-IJCNLP 2021), Online.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-demo.2 ↗
31. Toral, A., Wieling, M., and Way, A. (2018). Post-editing Effort of a Novel with Statistical and Neural Machine Translation. Front. Artif. Intell., 1.10.3389/fdigh.2018.00009 ↗
32. Kahlen, F.J., Flumerfelt, S., and Alves, A. (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7 ↗
33. Digital Twins and Cyber–Physical Systems toward Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and Comparison10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.014 ↗
34. Bhattacharyya, P., Chatterjee, R., Freitag, M., Kanojia, D., Negri, M., and Turchi, M. (2023, January 6–7). Findings of the WMT 2023 Shared Task on Automatic Post-Editing. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Machine Translation (WMT 2023), Singapore.10.18653/v1/2023.wmt-1.55 ↗
35. A Study on Integrating Digital Twin Pipelines Using USD and AI Simulation10.61413/QMBH8242 ↗
36. Ahn, S.-H. (2025). Interpretation Twin: A USD-Based Architecture for Real-Time Simultaneous Interpreting Assistance. PeerJ Comput. Sci., under review.
37. Lu, Y., Shu, L., Tan, X., and Sun, Y. (2023, January 9–14). Persistent Memory Augmented Dialogue Systems. Proceedings of the ACL 2023, Toronto, ON, Canada.
38. Wang, X., Zhang, Y., and Chen, H. (2023, January 6–10). Document-Level State Tracking for Information Extraction. Proceedings of the EMNLP 2023, Singapore.
39. Lei, X., Li, J., Tao, S., and Yang, H. (2024, January 20–25). Evaluation Dataset for Lexical Translation Consistency in Chinese-to-English Document-level Translation. Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), Torino, Italy.10.63317/3awrubvy53di ↗
40. Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K.Q., and Artzi, Y. (2020, January 26–30). BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2020), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
41. Popović, M. (2017, January 7–8). chrF++: Words Helping Character N-grams. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation (WMT 2017), Copenhagen, Denmark.10.18653/v1/W17-4770 ↗