Show source-provided references
2. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: Recommendations from the international consensus on time in range
10.2337/dci19-0028 ↗3. A review of personalized blood glucose prediction strategies for T1DM patients
10.1002/cnm.2833 ↗5. Benchmarking machine learning algorithms on blood glucose prediction for type I diabetes in comparison with classical time-series models
10.1109/TBME.2020.2975959 ↗6. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity
8. Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series
10.1109/TBME.2006.889774 ↗9. Multivariate prediction of subcutaneous glucose concentration in type 1 diabetes patients based on support vector regression
10.1109/TITB.2012.2219876 ↗10. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.
10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗11. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.-Y. (2017, January 4–9). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Long Beach, CA, USA. Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/6907-lightgbm-a-highly-efficient-gradient-boosting-decision-tree.
13. Sun, Q., Jankovic, M.V., Bally, L., and Mougiakakou, S.G. (2018, January 20–22). Predicting blood glucose with an LSTM and Bi-LSTM based deep neural network. Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Neural Networks and Applications (NEUREL), Belgrade, Serbia.
10.1109/NEUREL.2018.8586990 ↗21. Cho, K., van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., and Bengio, Y. (2014, January 25–29). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.
10.3115/v1/D14-1179 ↗22. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017, January 4–9). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Long Beach, CA, USA. Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpreting-model-predictions.
23. Grinsztajn, L., Oyallon, E., and Varoquaux, G. (December, January 28). Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on typical tabular data?. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), New Orleans, LA, USA. Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/hash/0378c7692da36807bdec87ab043cdadc-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html.
24. Arik, S.Ö., and Pfister, T. (2021, January 2–9). TabNet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual.
10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 ↗25. Gorishniy, Y., Rubachev, I., Khrulkov, V., and Babenko, A. (2021, January 6–14). Revisiting deep learning models for tabular data. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Virtual. Available online: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/9d86d83f925f2149e9edb0ac3b49229c-Abstract.html.
26. Huang, X., Khetan, A., Cvitkovic, M., and Karnin, Z. (2020). TabTransformer: Tabular data modeling using contextual embeddings. arXiv.
27. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026, March 20). Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/145022/download.
28. Mitev, P. (2025). Development of a System for Flexible Feeding of Parts with Robot and Machine Vision. Eng. Proc., 104.
10.3390/engproc2025104084 ↗29. Development of a system for automatic feeding and orientation of cylindrical parts
30. Mitev, P., Tashev, A., and Stoyanov, Y. (2025). Design and Construction of an Engine Oil Viscosity Meter with Electronic Control. Eng. Proc., 100.
10.3390/engproc2025100055 ↗