journal article·2026-04-17Open access

Toward Auditable Urban Soil Management: A Knowledge Graph and LLM Approach Fusing Environmental and Geochemical Data

Xi Qin, Yanlin Tang, Yirong Deng, Meiqu Lu, Wenqiang He, Jinrui Song, Keyu Lin, Feng Han

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

Urban soil contamination poses persistent risks to redevelopment, public health, and ecological restoration, yet actionable evidence is scattered across site investigation reports, monitoring databases, and regulatory documents. Existing decision-support tools often depend on manual searches and provide limited structured reasoning. This study develops a domain knowledge graph (KG) and a KG-powered question-answering (KBQA) system for urban soil management to organize multi-source evidence and deliver precise, auditable answers to parcel- and pollutant-specific queries. The approach (1) defines an urban soil ontology covering parcels, land uses, pollutants, measurements, pathways, and regulatory thresholds; (2) extracts and links entities and relations from textual and tabular sources; (3) constructs a graph database with provenance; and (4) implements a KBQA pipeline that maps natural-language questions to constrained graph queries and verbalizes results with citations. The resulting system supports source identification, land-use-specific exceedance checks, affected-parcel listing, and remediation reference retrieval. Experiments on a curated QA set and a South China case study show higher answer accuracy and lower latency than text-only baselines, while consistently returning traceable evidence and reducing cross-document lookup effort. Compared to text-only RAG baselines, the KG-powered system achieved a 0.14 improvement in Exact Match scores (e.g., 0.81 vs. 0.58 for Threshold tasks) and maintained a competitive median latency of 0.75 s. The pipeline utilizes a 13B-parameter instruction-tuned LLM. The ontology, schema, benchmark QA sets, and sample queries are publicly released to support transfer to other regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping · Graph Theory and Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Library, Guangxi University for Nationalities, No. 188 Daxue East Road, Nanning 530006, China

School of Artificial Intelligence, Guangxi University for Nationalities, No. 188 Daxue East Road, Nanning 530006, China

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hybrid Computation and IC Design Analysis, No. 188 Daxue East Road, Nanning 530006, China

Guangdong Academy of Environmental Science, No. 84 Zhiming Road, Huangpu District, Guangzhou 510045, China

School of Earth Science and Engineering, Haiqin Building 4, Sun Yat Sen University, Tangjiawan Town, Zhuhai 519080, China

Funding

MOST, China · Guangxi University for Nationalities, China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. A survey of knowledge based question answering with deep learning10.32604/jai.2020.011541 ↗
2. Soil pollution: Urban brownfields10.1126/science.344.6185.691-b ↗
3. A review of heavy metal pollution levels and health risk assessment of urban soils in Chinese cities10.1007/s11356-017-0513-1 ↗
4. (2018). Soil Environmental Quality–Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Development Land (Standard No. GB 36600-2018).
5. Analysis of nationwide soil pesticide pollution: Insights from China10.1016/j.envres.2024.118988 ↗
6. Potentially toxic elements in urban soils of the coastal city of the Sea of Azov: Levels, sources, pollution and risk assessment10.1016/j.envres.2024.119080 ↗
7. Zhou, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, A., and Wang, J. (2018). Earth Science Big Data Mining and Machine Learning, Sun Yat-sen University Press. (In Chinese).
8. Balseiro-Romero, M., and Baveye, P.C. (2018). Book Review: Soil Pollution: A Hidden Danger Beneath our Feet. Front. Environ. Sci., 6.10.3389/fenvs.2018.00130 ↗
9. Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats: Researchers’ experiences from across Europe10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110005 ↗
10. Open geospatial consortium (OGC)
11. Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, H., and Wang, H. (2023). Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv.
12. Edge, D., Trinh, H., Cheng, N., Bradley, J., Chao, A., Mody, A., Truitt, S., and Larson, J. (2024). From local to global: A graph rag approach to query-focused summarization. arXiv.
13. Lukovnikov, D., Fischer, A., Lehmann, J., and Auer, S. (2017, January 3–7). Neural network-based question answering over knowledge graphs on word and character level. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, Perth, Australia.10.1145/3038912.3052675 ↗
14. Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering: A Survey10.1109/TKDE.2022.3223858 ↗
15. Research and Applications Analysis of Knowledge Base Question Answering10.54097/hset.v16i.2067 ↗
16. ComQA: Question Answering Over Knowledge Base via Semantic Matching10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918675 ↗
17. Fu, B., Qiu, Y., Tang, C., Li, Y., Yu, H., and Sun, J. (2020). A Survey on Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Base: Recent Advances and Challenges. arXiv.
18. IoT Monitoring and Visualization of Urban Soil Pollution Based on Microservice Architecture
19. Cui, W., Xiao, Y., Wang, H., Song, Y., Hwang, S.-W., and Wang, W. (2019). KBQA: Learning Question Answering over QA Corpora and Knowledge Bases. arXiv.
20. Wang, Y., Lipka, N., Rossi, R.A., Siu, A., Zhang, R., and Derr, T. (2024, January 20–27). Knowledge graph prompting for multi-document question answering. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1609/aaai.v38i17.29889 ↗
21. Knowledge graph-driven question answering for prefabricated building quality management through natural language processing and transfer learning
22. A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognition10.1109/TKDE.2020.2981314 ↗
23. Knowledge graphs10.1145/3447772 ↗
24. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-T., and Rocktäschel, T. (2020, January 6–12). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Virtual/Online.
25. Robertson, S., and Zaragoza, H. (2009). The Probabilistic Relevance Framework: BM25 and Beyond, Now Publishers Inc.10.1561/1500000019 ↗
26. Karpukhin, V., Oguz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P., Wu, L., Edunov, S., Chen, D., and Yih, W.-T. (2020, January 16–20). Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Online.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550 ↗
27. A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions
28. Zhou, Y., and Zuo, R. (2025). Application of Big Data Mining, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Ore Deposits, MDPI.10.3390/books978-3-7258-5464-6 ↗
29. Efficient validation of SHACL shapes with reasoning10.14778/3681954.3682023 ↗
30. Cortés, C., Ehrlinger, L., Etcheverry, L., and Naumann, F. (2025). Is SHACL Suitable for Data Quality Assessment?. arXiv.
31. Ontology construction of multi-level ore deposit and its application in knowledge graph
32. Overview: A glimpse of the latest advances in artificial intelligence and big data geoscience research