Dual-Layer Sustainable Optimization Framework: An Application to Building Structure Floor Design
Source abstract
Abstract
The construction industry is one of the primary global contributors to carbon emissions, with both construction materials and operational energy recognized as critical factors in achieving net-zero goals. Given that structural systems are embodied carbon-intensive, significant early-stage carbon reductions are possible. This paper introduces the dual-layer sustainable optimization framework (DLSOF), a methodology that integrates system-level substitution with span-level optimization and a single life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach focused on embodied carbon (EC) that is applicable to various construction types and climate regions. To validate DLSOF, two representative models of reinforced concrete buildings were selected for analysis: one focused on alternate structural systems and the other on span optimization for a standard slab configuration. The results indicate that, in most cases, span optimization achieves a reduction in embodied carbon of 33%, whilst system-level substitution, in most cases, achieves a reduction of approximately 30%. The dual-layer approach, in comparison to conventional baseline designs, achieves approximately a 52% reduction in embodied carbon. Uncertainty analysis indicates variability in design and data inputs, but the overall trend of embodied carbon reduction remains consistent. The results highlight the critical nature of the early structural design stage. For engineers, the DLSOF provides a practical design pathway, and it offers flexibility to accommodate diverse sustainability goals across varying geographical contexts. This study establishes a replicable and transferable model for low-carbon structural design by systematically integrating design optimization with embodied carbon assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Building Engineering, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Shahsavar, A., Ghadamian, H., and Saboori, H. (2023). Building Energy and Environmental Sustainability. Building Energy Flexibility and Demand Management, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-99588-7.00006-7 ↗
2. Review of sustainability in buildings10.1016/j.scs.2014.09.002 ↗
3. Paris targets within reach by aligning, broadening and strengthening net-zero pledges10.1038/s43247-023-01184-8 ↗
4. Life cycle cost analysis of residential energy retrofits: Achieving near-zero energy homes in desert climates10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113316 ↗
5. A comprehensive assessment of the impact of the Saudi Building Code (SBC) on energy performance of residential buildings in Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116524 ↗
6. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2025, October 05). Updated Nationally Determined Contribution, 2021 Submission to UNFCCC. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/202203111154---KSA%20NDC%202021.pdf.
7. Elattar, S., Hu, X., Golzad, H., and Banihashemi, S. (2025). Environmental sustainability of advanced structures: A descriptive and thematic analysis. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15122027 ↗
8. Amirkhani, M., and Martek, I. (2024). Latest research on the theme of sustainability, challenges, and opportunities to optimize building performance. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162210040 ↗
9. Integrating life cycle assessment and cost analysis in decision making: Optimising design choices in a public building case study10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116399 ↗
10. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete mixtures: A critical review10.1080/19648189.2022.2078885 ↗
11. Assessing the life cycle CO2 emissions of reinforced concrete structures: Four cases from China10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.102 ↗
12. Environmental considerations for structural design of flat plate buildings—Significance of and interrelation between different design variables10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128123 ↗
13. Concrete slab comparison and embodied energy optimisation for alternate design and construction techniques10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.071 ↗
14. Minimizing embodied energy of reinforced concrete floor systems in developing countries through shape optimization10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112955 ↗
15. Laudeman, S.M., Raja, T., and Bansal, N. (2022, January 5–7). Early-stage structural steel estimation for embodied carbon decision making. Proceedings of the ASHRAE Building Decarbonization 2022 Conference, Athens, Greece.
16. Equations for early-stage design embodied carbon estimation for concrete floors of varying loading and strength10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117369 ↗
17. Environmental impact assessment of residential building structural systems: A case study in Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106644 ↗
18. Environmental impact assessment of floor system spans: A life cycle approach for sustainable structures10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106851 ↗
19. Integrated LCA–LEED sustainability assessment model for structure and envelope systems of school buildings10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.021 ↗
20. Alhazmi, H., Alduwais, A.K., Tabbakh, T., Aljamlani, S., Alkahlan, B., and Kurdi, A. (2021). Environmental performance of residential buildings: A life cycle assessment study in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13063542 ↗
21. A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106290 ↗
22. Integrated life cycle cost method for sustainable structural design by focusing on a benchmark office building in Australia10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.034 ↗
23. Almulhim, M.S.M., Hunt, D.V.L., and Rogers, C.D.F. (2020). A resilience and environmentally sustainable assessment framework (RESAF) for domestic building materials in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083092 ↗
24. A systematic review of the integration of building information modeling into life cycle assessment10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109260 ↗
25. Multi-objective optimization of embodied and operational energy and carbon emission of a building envelope10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139510 ↗
26. Influence of steel-to-concrete ratio on sustainable column design in Saudi Arabia10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40261 ↗
27. Khahro, S.H., Kumar, D., Siddiqui, F.H., Ali, T.H., Raza, M.S., and Khoso, A.R. (2021). Optimizing energy use, cost and carbon emission through building information modelling and a sustainability approach: A case-study of a hospital building. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13073675 ↗
28. Sustainable urban planning strategies for mitigating climate change in Saudi Arabia10.1007/s10668-019-00417-1 ↗
29. Jamoussi, B., Abu-Rizaiza, A., and Al-Haij, A. (2022). Sustainable building standards, codes and certification systems: The status quo and future directions in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141610314 ↗
30. Almulhim, M.S.M., and Al Masmoum, M.W. (2024). Optimizing concrete grade for a sustainable structural design in Saudi Arabia. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14040860 ↗
31. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2026, January 18). Saudi Loading Code (SBC 301) Riyadh, Available online: https://sbc.gov.sa.
32. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2026, January 18). Saudi Construction Code (SBC 302) Riyadh, Available online: https://sbc.gov.sa.
33. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2026, January 18). Saudi Concrete Structures Code (SBC 304) Riyadh, Available online: https://sbc.gov.sa.
34. Sustainable design for reinforced concrete columns through embodied energy and CO2 emission optimization10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.013 ↗
35. Holický, M., and Sýkora, M. (2021). Reliability approaches affecting the sustainability of concrete structures. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13052627 ↗
36. (2011). Sustainability of Construction Works. Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings. Calculation method (Standard No. BS EN 15978:2011).
37. Hammond, G., and Jones, C. (2011). BSRIA Guide, Embodied Carbon: The Inventory of Carbon and Energy, BSRIA.
38. Material quantities and embodied carbon dioxide in structures
39. Buildings environmental impacts’ sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.052 ↗
40. Assessment of the embodied carbon performance of post-tensioned voided concrete plates as a sustainable floor solution in multi-story buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116847 ↗
41. Paknahad, C., Tohidi, M., and Bahadori-Jahromi, A. (2025). Improving the sustainability of reinforced concrete structures through the adoption of eco-friendly flooring systems. Sustainability, 17.10.20944/preprints202502.0687.v1 ↗
42. Optimising flat plate buildings based on carbon footprint using Branch-and-Reduce deterministic algorithm10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128780 ↗
43. Decision support model for one-way floor slab design: A sustainable approach10.1016/j.autcon.2013.06.002 ↗
44. Xiang, Y. (2025). Design Optimisation Towards Lower Embodied Carbon Emissions in Prefabricated Constructions in China: A Microlevel Parametric Approach. [Doctoral Dissertation, University College London].
45. Machine learning-driven innovations in green eco-environmental rubberized concrete design towards sustainability10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108551 ↗
46. A comprehensive approach to mitigation of embodied carbon in reinforced concrete buildings10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.035 ↗
47. Government of Saudi Arabia (2026, February 02). Saudi Arabia’s Vision for 2030; Saudi Vision 2030: Saudi Arabia, Available online: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/media/rc0b5oy1/saudi_vision203.pdf.
48. Lombardi, D., Leach, J., Rogers, C., Aston, R., Barber, A.R.G., Boyko, C., Brown, J., Bryson, J.R., Butler, D., and Caputo, S. (2012). Designing Resilient Cities, IHS BRE Press.
49. Sustainability and resilience: A review of definitions, relationships, and their integration into a combined building assessment framework10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.042 ↗
50. Sustainable and resilient construction: Current status and future challenges10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122264 ↗